[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Ruby off the Rails

Chris Duncan

8/21/2007 2:54:00 PM

I did a quick search on jobserve.com for 'ruby'. I got 60 hits, most
of which were unsurprisingly asking for RoR developers. I did another
search for 'perl' and got 958 hits. While I am very pleased that RoR
is being more widely adopted, it would seem that there is little or no
demand for Ruby developers outside of rails.

Are there a growing number of non-Rails Ruby jobs that I'm not
spotting? Or are there really very few organisations that are willing
to adopt Ruby as a general purpose scripting language?
10 Answers

dougal.s

8/21/2007 3:08:00 PM

0

Hi there.

On 21 Aug 2007, at 15:53, celldee wrote:
> I did a quick search on jobserve.com for 'ruby'. I got 60 hits, most
> of which were unsurprisingly asking for RoR developers. I did another
> search for 'perl' and got 958 hits. While I am very pleased that RoR
> is being more widely adopted, it would seem that there is little or no
> demand for Ruby developers outside of rails.
>
> Are there a growing number of non-Rails Ruby jobs that I'm not
> spotting? Or are there really very few organisations that are willing
> to adopt Ruby as a general purpose scripting language?
>
>

From my searches on Jobserve over the last few months, it would seem
there is little demand for Ruby developers outside of Rails. It
certainly seems the case that demand for ruby skills is driven by
Rails, rather than the language being adopted in it's own right.

There has however been some increase in the number of RoR jobs, some
of which are even making it north of the border (I'm in Edinburgh,
Scotland). I've even had potential clients call me in the last few
weeks to ask about Rails for doing work they previously did with Java
or PHP.

Interesting times.

Douglas F Shearer
dougal.s@gmail.com
http://douglasfs...

byte8bits

8/21/2007 3:15:00 PM

0

celldee wrote:
> Are there a growing number of non-Rails Ruby jobs that I'm not
> spotting? Or are there really very few organisations that are willing
> to adopt Ruby as a general purpose scripting language?

Just my observations. I don't encounter it as an official
corporate/institutional language, however, I do see it a lot at the
sys-admin/java developer levels... bottom to top if you will. It's more
of an un-official language used by local developers who are on average
more inquisitive than most. I see Python usage like this too, however,
it seems to be moving more to an 'official' position in companies. Perl
is still strongly entrenched. Many Solaris Admins won't allow any other
interpreted language besides Perl and really prefer sh scripts as many
Perl scripts have rely on non-standard modules that aren't (and won't
be) installed for security reasons.

Just my 2 cents

Mohit Sindhwani

8/21/2007 3:27:00 PM

0

brad wrote:
> celldee wrote:
> > Are there a growing number of non-Rails Ruby jobs that I'm not
>> spotting? Or are there really very few organisations that are willing
>> to adopt Ruby as a general purpose scripting language?
>
> Just my observations. I don't encounter it as an official
> corporate/institutional language, however, I do see it a lot at the
> sys-admin/java developer levels... bottom to top if you will. It's
> more of an un-official language used by local developers who are on
> average more inquisitive than most. I see Python usage like this too,
> however, it seems to be moving more to an 'official' position in
> companies. Perl is still strongly entrenched. Many Solaris Admins
> won't allow any other interpreted language besides Perl and really
> prefer sh scripts as many Perl scripts have rely on non-standard
> modules that aren't (and won't be) installed for security reasons.
>
> Just my 2 cents
>

At my company, we use Ruby for a lot of general scripting (and this is
on Windows) for things like downloading files, pre-processing data,
generating statistics and graphs, monitoring link status, sending out
emails when things fail, converting data between different data formats,
move data between programs, hold different programs together, and oh
yes, for Rails.

My only complaint with Ruby tends to be that on Windows, it takes a bit
of time before the script loads. But that said, the development time
with Ruby is fantastic and lets us achieve things very very fast!

However, now that you bring it up, at least for our tasks, we find that
scripting in Ruby just doesn't require a full-time hand. Yes, when
we're doing some Rails work, it takes a few days to get a medium sized
app done, but for most general Ruby scripts, the development time is in
hours. Admittedly, we do a lot of development in C, C++ and Java for
our regular stuff.

It is likely that a lot of people are just using it on the side to get
things done quickly and then on to something else?

Cheers,
Mohit.
8/21/2007 | 11:27 PM.

Robert Klemme

8/21/2007 4:23:00 PM

0

On 21.08.2007 17:27, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
> My only complaint with Ruby tends to be that on Windows, it takes a bit
> of time before the script loads. But that said, the development time
> with Ruby is fantastic and lets us achieve things very very fast!

Did you consider that this might be due to the AV engine your shop uses?

> It is likely that a lot of people are just using it on the side to get
> things done quickly and then on to something else?

I guess I fall into that category: my main work is Java and databases
but I use Ruby frequently for things like evaluating log files,
generating statistics from them etc.

Kind regards

robert

Robert Klemme

8/21/2007 4:26:00 PM

0

On 21.08.2007 16:53, celldee wrote:
> Are there a growing number of non-Rails Ruby jobs that I'm not
> spotting? Or are there really very few organisations that are willing
> to adopt Ruby as a general purpose scripting language?

Maybe productivity with Ruby is so high that only few developer
resources are needed (see Mohit's posting). That's bad for Ruby jobs
but would be an incredible selling point for the language...

Kind regards

robert

Mohit Sindhwani

8/21/2007 4:35:00 PM

0

Robert Klemme wrote:
> On 21.08.2007 17:27, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
>> My only complaint with Ruby tends to be that on Windows, it takes a
>> bit of time before the script loads. But that said, the development
>> time with Ruby is fantastic and lets us achieve things very very fast!
>
> Did you consider that this might be due to the AV engine your shop uses?
>
>> It is likely that a lot of people are just using it on the side to
>> get things done quickly and then on to something else?
>
> I guess I fall into that category: my main work is Java and databases
> but I use Ruby frequently for things like evaluating log files,
> generating statistics from them etc.
>
> Kind regards
>
> robert
>
Hi Robert,

The point regarding the AV is interesting. We're using Symantec Norton
AV. I've never looked at it closely because I started with Rails and
everyone on Rails-talk was complaining that Rails took ages on Windows.
So, I assumed that it was normal that a script took 4 - 6 seconds to
start. Any pointers what I may be looking for here?

Thanks again!

Cheers,
Mohit.
8/22/2007 | 12:34 AM.

Robert Klemme

8/21/2007 4:38:00 PM

0

On 21.08.2007 18:34, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
> Robert Klemme wrote:
>> On 21.08.2007 17:27, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
>>> My only complaint with Ruby tends to be that on Windows, it takes a
>>> bit of time before the script loads. But that said, the development
>>> time with Ruby is fantastic and lets us achieve things very very fast!
>>
>> Did you consider that this might be due to the AV engine your shop uses?
>>
>>> It is likely that a lot of people are just using it on the side to
>>> get things done quickly and then on to something else?
>>
>> I guess I fall into that category: my main work is Java and databases
>> but I use Ruby frequently for things like evaluating log files,
>> generating statistics from them etc.
>
> The point regarding the AV is interesting. We're using Symantec Norton
> AV. I've never looked at it closely because I started with Rails and
> everyone on Rails-talk was complaining that Rails took ages on Windows.
> So, I assumed that it was normal that a script took 4 - 6 seconds to
> start. Any pointers what I may be looking for here?

If you can switch off the AV engine and see whether your scripts come up
faster. As a minimum you might be able to exclude your Ruby directories
from scanning. It all depends on your admins.

Kind regards

robert

Mohit Sindhwani

8/21/2007 4:42:00 PM

0

Robert Klemme wrote:
> On 21.08.2007 18:34, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
>> Robert Klemme wrote:
>>> On 21.08.2007 17:27, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
>>>> My only complaint with Ruby tends to be that on Windows, it takes a
>>>> bit of time before the script loads. But that said, the
>>>> development time with Ruby is fantastic and lets us achieve things
>>>> very very fast!
>>>
>>> Did you consider that this might be due to the AV engine your shop
>>> uses?
>>>
>>>> It is likely that a lot of people are just using it on the side to
>>>> get things done quickly and then on to something else?
>>>
>>> I guess I fall into that category: my main work is Java and
>>> databases but I use Ruby frequently for things like evaluating log
>>> files, generating statistics from them etc.
>>
>> The point regarding the AV is interesting. We're using Symantec
>> Norton AV. I've never looked at it closely because I started with
>> Rails and everyone on Rails-talk was complaining that Rails took ages
>> on Windows. So, I assumed that it was normal that a script took 4 -
>> 6 seconds to start. Any pointers what I may be looking for here?
>
> If you can switch off the AV engine and see whether your scripts come
> up faster. As a minimum you might be able to exclude your Ruby
> directories from scanning. It all depends on your admins.
>
> Kind regards
>
> robert
>

Thanks Robert

I'll look into this tomorrow - it is an interesting thing to check out
anyway. On the other hand, the things we are working with do not get
affected if a script takes a few seconds to start up!

Cheers,
Mohit.
8/22/2007 | 12:42 AM.

Kyle Schmitt

8/21/2007 5:48:00 PM

0

My 2 cents.
I'm under the impression that the reason that many AVs will slow down
ruby is because they check all file open operations, to make sure they
are kosher. This won't just slow down ruby, but any other scripting
language that involves many many files, and even compiled languages
that require many files. There are stories floating around of people
having to do major restructuring work on applications because they
ended up crawling when AV is on.

--Kyle

On 8/21/07, Mohit Sindhwani <mo_mail@onghu.com> wrote:
> Robert Klemme wrote:
> > On 21.08.2007 18:34, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
> >> Robert Klemme wrote:
> >>> On 21.08.2007 17:27, Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
> >>>> My only complaint with Ruby tends to be that on Windows, it takes a
> >>>> bit of time before the script loads. But that said, the
> >>>> development time with Ruby is fantastic and lets us achieve things
> >>>> very very fast!
> >>>
> >>> Did you consider that this might be due to the AV engine your shop
> >>> uses?
> >>>
> >>>> It is likely that a lot of people are just using it on the side to
> >>>> get things done quickly and then on to something else?
> >>>
> >>> I guess I fall into that category: my main work is Java and
> >>> databases but I use Ruby frequently for things like evaluating log
> >>> files, generating statistics from them etc.
> >>
> >> The point regarding the AV is interesting. We're using Symantec
> >> Norton AV. I've never looked at it closely because I started with
> >> Rails and everyone on Rails-talk was complaining that Rails took ages
> >> on Windows. So, I assumed that it was normal that a script took 4 -
> >> 6 seconds to start. Any pointers what I may be looking for here?
> >
> > If you can switch off the AV engine and see whether your scripts come
> > up faster. As a minimum you might be able to exclude your Ruby
> > directories from scanning. It all depends on your admins.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > robert
> >
>
> Thanks Robert
>
> I'll look into this tomorrow - it is an interesting thing to check out
> anyway. On the other hand, the things we are working with do not get
> affected if a script takes a few seconds to start up!
>
> Cheers,
> Mohit.
> 8/22/2007 | 12:42 AM.
>
>
>
>

Lloyd Linklater

8/22/2007 6:40:00 PM

0

celldee wrote:
> I did a quick search on jobserve.com for 'ruby'. I got 60 hits, most
> of which were unsurprisingly asking for RoR developers. I did another
> search for 'perl' and got 958 hits. While I am very pleased that RoR
> is being more widely adopted, it would seem that there is little or no
> demand for Ruby developers outside of rails.
>
> Are there a growing number of non-Rails Ruby jobs that I'm not
> spotting? Or are there really very few organisations that are willing
> to adopt Ruby as a general purpose scripting language?

Well, there are other things to consider. Even though the number of PHP
to ruby jobs is about 15:1 in this case, that is not really the end of
the story. If there are more than 15 PHP programmers to every ruby one,
then there are actually MORE jobs. Also, ruby is not yet in the
mainstream but it muddling its way there. Such things take time to
start but can snowball quickly, as happened with Java. Managers decide
which language to use and who to hire. They are typically ignorant of
such things and need to have things waved in their face before they feel
enough backbone forming that they can tell the big boys in the meetings
that they want to use ruby.

On the plus side, when the snowball does start, those that have been
doing it in the pre-dawn times will have a major head start. :)

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....