[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

svn+http on RubyForge

Tom Copeland

7/21/2007 12:20:00 AM

Hi all -

Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
read-only access to the svn repositories. For example:

====================
$ svn checkout http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/... mongrel
A mongrel/test
A mongrel/test/test_command.rb
A mongrel/test/test_redirect_handler.rb
A mongrel/test/test_response.rb
A mongrel/test/test_stats.rb
[ ... etc ... ]
====================

Enjoy!

Yours,

Tom
http://generatingparserswithj...
8 Answers

Robert Dober

7/21/2007 6:02:00 PM

0

On 7/21/07, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
> read-only access to the svn repositories. For example:
>
> ====================
> $ svn checkout http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/... mongrel
> A mongrel/test
> A mongrel/test/test_command.rb
> A mongrel/test/test_redirect_handler.rb
> A mongrel/test/test_response.rb
> A mongrel/test/test_stats.rb
> [ ... etc ... ]
> ====================
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Yours,
>
> Tom
> http://generatingparserswithj...
>
>
>
>
Great news and a good occasion to say thanks to Tom for the great work :)

Cheers
Robert

--
I always knew that one day Smalltalk would replace Java.
I just didn't know it would be called Ruby
-- Kent Beck

Tomas Pospisek

7/21/2007 9:10:00 PM

0

Ryan Davis

7/22/2007 1:53:00 AM

0


On Jul 21, 2007, at 11:01 , Robert Dober wrote:

> On 7/21/07, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
>> Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http
>> for
>> read-only access to the svn repositories. For example:
>>
> Great news and a good occasion to say thanks to Tom for the great
> work :)

Even better would be to give a tangible "thank you" to Tom for doing
such a damn fine job of maintaining and improving a critical resource
to all of us. He likes dark beer and porter. I was thinking of
getting some donations via paypal and sending him a thank you gift he
could really appreciate.

If you're interested, let me know and I'll see what we can do.

P.S. I don't drink so suggestions on dark beer / porter that can be
ordered and shipped via the interwebs would be appreciated.

Tom Copeland

7/22/2007 2:54:00 AM

0

On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 10:52 +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2007, at 11:01 , Robert Dober wrote:
>
> > On 7/21/07, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> >> Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http
> >> for
> >> read-only access to the svn repositories. For example:
> >>
> > Great news and a good occasion to say thanks to Tom for the great
> > work :)
>
> Even better would be to give a tangible "thank you" to Tom for doing
> such a damn fine job of maintaining and improving a critical resource
> to all of us. He likes dark beer and porter. I was thinking of
> getting some donations via paypal and sending him a thank you gift he
> could really appreciate.
>
> If you're interested, let me know and I'll see what we can do.
>
> P.S. I don't drink so suggestions on dark beer / porter that can be
> ordered and shipped via the interwebs would be appreciated.

Thanks to all for the kind words! And should I receive beer, I promise
not to do any sysadmin work on RubyForge after drinking it :-)

Yours,

Tom

Tom Copeland

7/22/2007 2:58:00 AM

0

On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 06:10 +0900, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Tom Copeland wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
> > read-only access to the svn repositories.
>
> Nice, thanks! I had to "tunnel" through our own server in order to
> checkout the current rubyforge mocha project at my current contract work.
> It took me several calls, some month and a half of waiting and a formal
> request for my client company to open the SVN port and then only to my own
> machine ... ;-). Life will be easier now.

Cool. I hope to get svn+https up and running at some point too. As far
as I can tell, it seems like svn+ssh and svn+https are mutually
exclusive for the same svn repo - either the filesystem has to handle
the permissions or mod_dav_svn has to. I'm working on a automated way
for a project admin to elect one or another... we shall see....

Yours,

Tom

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

7/22/2007 5:09:00 AM

0

Ryan Davis wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2007, at 11:01 , Robert Dober wrote:
>
>> On 7/21/07, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
>>> Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
>>> read-only access to the svn repositories. For example:
>>>
>> Great news and a good occasion to say thanks to Tom for the great work :)
>
> Even better would be to give a tangible "thank you" to Tom for doing
> such a damn fine job of maintaining and improving a critical resource to
> all of us. He likes dark beer and porter. I was thinking of getting some
> donations via paypal and sending him a thank you gift he could really
> appreciate.
>
> If you're interested, let me know and I'll see what we can do.
>
> P.S. I don't drink so suggestions on dark beer / porter that can be
> ordered and shipped via the interwebs would be appreciated.
>
>
>
Email me off list for some links to the best beer in the world from
right here in Oregon, USA. :) The breweries themselves don't appear to
ship, but there are retailers who do.

Paul Duncan

7/23/2007 1:41:00 PM

0

* Tom Copeland (tom@infoether.com) wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 06:10 +0900, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Jul 2007, Tom Copeland wrote:
> >
> > > Just wanted to let folks know that RubyForge now supports svn+http for
> > > read-only access to the svn repositories.
> >
> > Nice, thanks! I had to "tunnel" through our own server in order to
> > checkout the current rubyforge mocha project at my current contract work.
> > It took me several calls, some month and a half of waiting and a formal
> > request for my client company to open the SVN port and then only to my own
> > machine ... ;-). Life will be easier now.
>
> Cool. I hope to get svn+https up and running at some point too. As far
> as I can tell, it seems like svn+ssh and svn+https are mutually
> exclusive for the same svn repo - either the filesystem has to handle
> the permissions or mod_dav_svn has to. I'm working on a automated way
> for a project admin to elect one or another... we shall see....

Try using mod_auth_pam to defer HTTP authentication to PAM; then people
don't have to pick and choose.

> Yours,
>
> Tom
>
>

--
Paul Duncan <pabs@pablotron.org> pabs in #ruby-lang (OPN IRC)
http://www.pabl... OpenPGP Key ID: 0x82C29562

Tom Copeland

7/24/2007 1:21:00 PM

0

On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 22:41 +0900, Paul Duncan wrote:
> * Tom Copeland (tom@infoether.com) wrote:
> > Cool. I hope to get svn+https up and running at some point too. As far
> > as I can tell, it seems like svn+ssh and svn+https are mutually
> > exclusive for the same svn repo - either the filesystem has to handle
> > the permissions or mod_dav_svn has to. I'm working on a automated way
> > for a project admin to elect one or another... we shall see....
>
> Try using mod_auth_pam to defer HTTP authentication to PAM; then people
> don't have to pick and choose.

Cool, I'll look into that...

Thanks,

Tom