Trans
6/19/2007 3:47:00 AM
On Jun 18, 5:22 pm, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 12:41, Trans wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 3:23 pm, Eric Hodel <drbr...@segment7.net> wrote:
> >> On Jun 18, 2007, at 11:50, Trans wrote:
> >>> I just don't see the value in rdoc including a file that's been
> >>> explicitly flagged for exclusion via -x/--exclude. Do you? Can we
> >>> get
> >>> sort of fix/feature for this in a future release of RDocs?
>
> >> Did you file a bug?
>
> >> I don't see how you can expect developers to keep track of bugs
> >> "filed" on a mailing list, especially one that isn't for the
> >> development of the software in question. If you find bugs and want
> >> them fixed, file them in the appropriate bug tracker.
>
> > Thanks Eric. I will do so...
>
> > It's just that I'm not sure it's a bug. I think it was meant to be
> > that way for some reason.
>
> If you're not sure, file a bug. At worst, the maintainer sees it and
> rejects it. After all, they're the best person to determine if what
> you've found is really a bug.
>
> > But I think maybe the reason turned out not to be so good after
> > all, but it's never been addressed b/c other tools (like the Rake
> > task) took care of the issue. I bring it up here first to see if my
> > reasoning is sound and that others concur. If they/you
> > do, I will submit a feature request.
>
> What if nobody agrees with you, but it really is a bug? The
> maintainer will never see it then. Its always better to file a bug.
Good point. It's a Ruby-core issue though, so I don't think it's all
for naught. But anyway, I submitted it. It's like 150th on the list.
T.