Ball, Donald A Jr (Library)
5/31/2007 4:04:00 PM
> On May 30, 2007, at 17:13 , Ball, Donald A Jr (Library) wrote:
>
> > I had actually considered image_science as an alternative,
> but given
> > the lack of an image_science gem that doesn't depend on having a c
> > compiler on the box (a relative rarety in the
> > win32
> > world, sadly), it's not an option for me.
>
> More FUD! How many times I've heard this crap I have no
> idea... We've been shipping inline with inline_package for
> over 2 years now. How long do you have to propagate this?
Apologies for the misinformation. All I know is that on my win32 box, if
I gem install image_science and all its dependencies,