Ryan Davis
5/30/2007 9:20:00 PM
On May 30, 2007, at 17:13 , Ball, Donald A Jr (Library) wrote:
> I had actually considered image_science as an
> alternative, but given the lack of an image_science gem that doesn't
> depend on having a c compiler on the box (a relative rarety in the
> win32
> world, sadly), it's not an option for me.
More FUD! How many times I've heard this crap I have no idea... We've
been shipping inline with inline_package for over 2 years now. How
long do you have to propagate this?