[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Installing Ruby and RubyGems on Red Hat Linux 9

Angrez

3/12/2007 6:09:00 AM

Hi,

I would like to know which versions of Ruby and RubyGems I can install
on Red Hat Linux 9?

I was able to install Ruby version 1.6.8-5 successfully.
But when I tried to install RubyGems 0.8.0 I got error like there is
no module called "FileUtils".
I got same error with RubyGems 0.4.0.
Then I tried installing RubyGems 0.2.0 i got error like there is no
module called 'stringio'.

I also tried installing Ruby 1.8.2-7.5 but got error that the versions
of required dependencies like libdb, libssl etc are not correct. It
required version 5.0 but Red Hat Linux 9 has version 4.0 for these
dependencies.

Could any one please let me know which Ruby and RubyGems version I can
install successfully with Red Hat Linux 9?

Thanks & Regards,
Angrez
3 Answers

Bill M

9/12/2008 7:12:00 PM

0

More religious nonsense!

"Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com> wrote in message
news:y0Dyk.29392$S64.19857@newsfe09.ams2...
> *elle* wrote:
>> On 12 Sep, 13:30, "Firnando" <geovani_the_ital...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> The basis of Muslim belief
>>>
>>> by Gary Miller
>>>
>>> About Gary Miller, the author
>>>
>>> Jesus and Adam
>>>
>>> Connecting these ideas and the idea that the Qur'an composed of
>>> verses that are perfected and then expounded for us, consider the
>>> verse which says:
>>>
>>> "The likeness of Jesus before Allah is as the likeness of Adam."
>>> (3:59)
>>>
>>> It is very clear that what we have in the statement is an equation.
>>> This verse goes on to explain how that is true because they both
>>> came under unusual circumstances rather than having a mother and a
>>> father in the usual human reproductive way. But more than that, I
>>> got to consider the use of the mention of words.
>>>
>>> The words are used clearly enough. Jesus is like Adam and by Jesus
>>> and Adam, we mean those two men. But what about the mention of the
>>> words? Was the author aware of the fact that if we were considering
>>> the words as words themselves, this sentence also read that 'Jesus'
>>> is something like 'Adam'. Well, they are not spelt with the same
>>> letters, how can they be alike in this revelation? The only answer
>>> came to me fairly quickly and I took a look at the index of the
>>> Qur'an.
>>>
>>> The index of the Qur'an has been made available only since 1945.
>>> This book was the result of years of work by a man and his students
>>> who assembled a book which lists every word in the Qur'an and where
>>> it can be found.
>>>
>>> So, when we look up the word Isa (Jesus), we find it in the Qur'an
>>> twenty-five times. When we look up Adam, we find it in the Qur'an
>>> twenty-five times. The point is that they are very much alike in
>>> this book. They are equated. So, following up on this idea, I
>>> continued to examine the index looking for every case where
>>> something was set up as an equation, where the likeness of something
>>> was said to be the likeness of some other thing. And in every case,
>>> it works. You have to example a verse which reads:
>>>
>>> "The likeness of this who reject our signs is as the likeness of the
>>> dog." (7:176)
>>>
>>> Well, the phrase is Arabic for 'the people who reject our signs'
>>> could be found in the Qur'an exactly five times. And so is the
>>> Arabic word for 'the dog' (al-kalb). And there are several instances
>>> of exactly the same occurrence.
>>>
>>> It was some months after I found this for myself that a friend of
>>> mine, who is continuing this investigation with me, made a
>>> suggestion that there are also some places in the Qur'an where one
>>> thing is said to be not like another thing.
>>>
>>> As soon as he mentioned this up to me, we both went for the index
>>> and had a quick look at several places where on thing is said to be
>>> not like another thing and counted their occurrence in the Qur'an.
>>> We were surprise and maybe should not have been to find that, after
>>> all, they do not match up. But an interesting thing does happen. For
>>> example, the Qur'an makes it very clear in the verse that trade is
>>> not like interest. The two words will be found six times for on and
>>> seven for the other. And so it is in every other case.
>>>
>>> When one thing is said to be not like another, they over for a
>>> difference of one time. It would be five of one and four of the
>>> other, or seven of one and eight of another.
>>>
>>> http://www.lancs.ac.uk/socs/islamic/discover_gary.htm#s...
>>
>> What did that exercise prove?
>
> That he's a moron who thinks it will make atheists believe his fairy
> stories.
>
> Smiler,
> The godless one
> a.a.# 2279
>


Emil Tiades

9/13/2008 1:53:00 PM

0


On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:34:47 +0100, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:

>*elle* wrote:
>> On 12 Sep, 13:30, "Firnando" <fucktard.muzzie.on.welfare@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> I am a fucktard muzzie on Canadian welfare


>>
>> What did that exercise prove?
>
>That he's a moron who thinks it will make atheists believe his fairy
>stories.
>


"Firnando" is the piece of shit otherwise known as faris jawad, the
fucktard muzzie on Canadian welfare

elle

9/14/2008 10:08:00 AM

0

On 13 Sep, 14:53, Emil Tiades <emiltia...@marathon.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:34:47 +0100, "Smiler" <Smi...@Joe.King.com>
> wrote:
>
> >*elle* wrote:
> >> On 12 Sep, 13:30, "Firnando" <fucktard.muzzie.on.welf...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> I am a fucktard muzzie on Canadian welfare
>
> >> What did that exercise prove?
>
> >That he's a moron who thinks it will make atheists believe his fairy
> >stories.
>
> "Firnando" is the piece of shit otherwise known as faris jawad, the
> fucktard muzzie on Canadian welfare

Couldn't understand that. Are you writing in plain English?