Asp Forum - MI5 Persecution: Stand up for Free Speech 14/8/95 (1968

MI5Victim

2/27/2007 5:30:00 PM

From: rji@cheetah.inmos.co.uk (Richard Ingram)
Newsgroups: uk.misc
Date: Mon Aug 14 10:08:32 1995

Some cencorship loving bore wrote :

> In article <GEVANS.95Aug14094119@mvagusta.uk.tele.nokia.fi> gevans@mvagusta.uk.tele.nokia.fi (Gareth Evans) writes:
>
> His sysadmin is also next to useless, and has not replied to my request or
> even acknowledged it. Maybe this person *is* a sysadmin?
>
> He's not. It seems the public access site he uses has got no proper
> management over its users. Here's a copy of a reply I got from a
> complaint I made. [After returning every one of Corley's postings to

[snip a large pile of winging complaining drivel]

Geez what a bunch of tossers you all are - you don't like someones postings so
you try and get him evicted from the net, why not just use a kill file - you
DONT have to read his posts/threads now do you ?

Why is it the net is getting populated by the biggest bunch of self absorbed
little Hitlers ? You don't like someones posts so you bloody complain or mail
bomb them - grow up you bunch of fucking sad gits !

Richard.

1968

2 Answers

John Doe

1/28/2011 10:54:00 AM

On 28 Jan 2011 08:25:32 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

>NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:18:09 -0800 (PST), Siobhan Medeiros
>><shanbo1926@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Jan 15, 6:23?am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 14 Jan 2011 18:21:45 GMT, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >NoBody ?<NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> >>On 14 Jan 2011 05:57:16 GMT, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>>NoBody ?<NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>On 13 Jan 2011 05:38:56 GMT, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> >>>>>M bius Pretzel ?<Mobius_m_Pret...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>Dear Rachel Maddow
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>Do I approve of the shooting in Arizona?
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>Of course not.
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>But as shocked by the shooting as I may be, I find myself utterly
>>>> >>>>>>disgusted at the apparatchiks waving the bloody sheets around as
>>>> >>>>>>battle flags for their own particular causes.
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>Obviously a MUCH worse thing to do than, say, KILLING people.
>>>>
>>>> >>>>Oh look, ray-ray excuses inflamatory rhetoric
>>>>
>>>> >>>The rightard is lying. ?No surprise ...
>>>>
>>>> >>Oh look, ray-ray denying the obvious.
>>>>
>>>> >And there's more fascist revision. ?The asshole lies about what people
>>>> >write and then accuses them of lying when they deny his lie.
>>>>
>>>> Where have I lied about what you said. ?If you mean your stupid
>>>> statement:
>>>>
>>>> "The US Supreme Court, by definition, is never wrong." (apparently
>>>> saying that the Dredd Scott Decision was correct -- watch him squirm
>>>> and twist folks...).
>>>>
>>>> Ray Fischer inhttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/a6......
>>>>
>>>> Then clarify what you meant. ?You claim to have clairified your
>>>> remarks and are great at quoting me, yet the best you can come with
>>>> for your own remarks is "I've done so".
>>>>
>>>> > ? ?I didn't say what you claim I said, liar.
>>>> > ? ?Nobody in <sepli61ik5ljapervtdsdu3ife3cbgd...@4ax.com>
>>>>
>>>> And I didn't in that article. ?Perhaps you have a point here? ?It
>>>> would be a first...
>>>
>>>After reading your link, I see that Ray never said fuck-all about the
>>>Dred Scott decision. So you are a lying asshole.
>>
>>You really are a moron.
>
>You really are a lying asshole.

I've used your own words and you deny them.

>
>> If he says the USSC is never wrong,
>
>Legally they're not.

Then the Dredd Scott decision was correct...duh....

>
>> then by
>>extension, he is saying the Dredd Scott Decision was correct since
>
>Sleazy equivocation, you lying asshole.

Irony anyone?

>
> "And I'm just *sure* you posted condemning Rachel Maddow's remarks
> about killing Buish...." whined Nobody in <7i1ri6lsfqj5qcj020rqqf20oru89o8rj5@4ax.com>
> apparently trying to excuse the right-wing political assassination attempt that
> killed six people.

And even more irony from ray-ray since the quotation from me doesn't
excuse anything and he lies in that there is no evidence the attack
was a "right-wing political assassination attempt".

"The US Supreme Court, by definition, is never wrong." (apparently
saying that the Dredd Scott Decision was correct -- watch him squirm
and twist folks...).

Ray Fischer in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/a6...e572?dmode=source

John Doe

1/28/2011 10:55:00 AM

On 28 Jan 2011 08:25:32 GMT, rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:

>NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:18:09 -0800 (PST), Siobhan Medeiros
>><shanbo1926@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Jan 15, 6:23?am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 14 Jan 2011 18:21:45 GMT, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >NoBody ?<NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> >>On 14 Jan 2011 05:57:16 GMT, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>>NoBody ?<NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>On 13 Jan 2011 05:38:56 GMT, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>> >>>>>M bius Pretzel ?<Mobius_m_Pret...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>Dear Rachel Maddow
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>Do I approve of the shooting in Arizona?
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>Of course not.
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>But as shocked by the shooting as I may be, I find myself utterly
>>>> >>>>>>disgusted at the apparatchiks waving the bloody sheets around as
>>>> >>>>>>battle flags for their own particular causes.
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>Obviously a MUCH worse thing to do than, say, KILLING people.
>>>>
>>>> >>>>Oh look, ray-ray excuses inflamatory rhetoric
>>>>
>>>> >>>The rightard is lying. ?No surprise ...
>>>>
>>>> >>Oh look, ray-ray denying the obvious.
>>>>
>>>> >And there's more fascist revision. ?The asshole lies about what people
>>>> >write and then accuses them of lying when they deny his lie.
>>>>
>>>> Where have I lied about what you said. ?If you mean your stupid
>>>> statement:
>>>>
>>>> "The US Supreme Court, by definition, is never wrong." (apparently
>>>> saying that the Dredd Scott Decision was correct -- watch him squirm
>>>> and twist folks...).
>>>>
>>>> Ray Fischer inhttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/a6......
>>>>
>>>> Then clarify what you meant. ?You claim to have clairified your
>>>> remarks and are great at quoting me, yet the best you can come with
>>>> for your own remarks is "I've done so".
>>>>
>>>> > ? ?I didn't say what you claim I said, liar.
>>>> > ? ?Nobody in <sepli61ik5ljapervtdsdu3ife3cbgd...@4ax.com>
>>>>
>>>> And I didn't in that article. ?Perhaps you have a point here? ?It
>>>> would be a first...
>>>
>>>After reading your link, I see that Ray never said fuck-all about the
>>>Dred Scott decision. So you are a lying asshole.
>>
>>You really are a moron.
>
>You really are a lying asshole.
>
>> If he says the USSC is never wrong,
>
>Legally they're not.

Then explain exactly how they were wrong about Dredd Scott since they
can't be wrong. This is what you've said so maybe you can explain it.

comp.lang.ruby

MI5 Persecution: Stand up for Free Speech 14/8/95 (1968

MI5Victim

John Doe

John Doe

x Login to ForumsZone