Iarnrod
2/1/2011 1:13:00 PM
On Feb 1, 3:37 am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:46:29 -0500, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:00:16 -0800 (PST),Iarnrod<iarn...@yahoo.com>
> >wrote:
>
> >>On Jan 28, 3:59 am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:24:55 -0800 (PST),Iarnrod<iarn...@yahoo.com>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>> >On Jan 27, 3:36 am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>> >> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:31:24 -0800 (PST),Iarnrod<iarn...@yahoo.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
>
> >>> >> >On Jan 26, 4:08 am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 06:10:51 -0800 (PST),Iarnrod<iarn...@yahoo.com>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
>
> >>> >> >> >On Jan 25, 3:57 am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:16:47 -0500, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:12:15 -0800 (PST),Iarnrod<iarn...@yahoo.com>
> >>> >> >> >> >wrote:
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>On Jan 21, 4:20 am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:21:47 -0800 (PST),Iarnrod<iarn...@yahoo.com>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >On Jan 20, 3:56 am, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:11:58 -0800 (PST),Iarnrod<iarn....@yahoo.com>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >On Jan 18, 10:11 am, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> On 1/18/2011 8:24 AM,Iarnrodwrote:
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > On Jan 15, 8:13 am, M ebius Pretzel <M0bius_S_Pret...@yahoo.com>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Obamacare Packs Crushing New Taxes
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > It cuts the deficit and costs less than what is now being paid.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> The big lie is repeated yet again.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >By you, of course. CBO proved Obamacare cuts the deficit.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> No it doesn't..
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> >Yes, it does.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> No it doesn't (your turn!).
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>The difference, kook, is that I am right and you are wrong.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >No you're not (your turn!).
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>> Read the government's own projections of
> >>> >> >> >> >>> the deficit increasing over the next 10 years.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>Holy SHIT, are you truly this stupid? Wait, yes you are since you're a
> >>> >> >> >> >>conservatard.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>Hint: It is entirely possible, nay likely, that the impact of some
> >>> >> >> >> >>programs can reduce the deficit in and of themselves -- like
> >>> >> >> >> >>Obamacare, with PROVEN deficit reduction -- while the total deficit
> >>> >> >> >> >>still increases due to all other programs, such as your tax cuts for
> >>> >> >> >> >>the super-rich. Gawd, stop being such a tool. Obamacare reduces the
> >>> >> >> >> >>deficit in comparison to what is being spent without it. Do you really
> >>> >> >> >> >>"think" we're not already paying more for haphazard uninsured care?
>
> >>> >> >> >> >>The fact that your side destroyed the economy is a sign that we
> >>> >> >> >> >>shouldn't take you morons seriously.
>
> >>> >> >> >> >You've failed to explain how the deficit will be reduced when the
> >>> >> >> >> >governments own projections say the exact opposite.
>
> >>> >> >> >> <crickets.wav>
>
> >>> >> >> >Umm, are you unaware I kicked your stupid kooker ass on this already,
> >>> >> >> >moron?
>
> >>> >> >> >Hint: You posted a reply that proved yourself incorrect. The
> >>> >> >> >government's projections of course do NOT "say the exact opposite,"
> >>> >> >> >they support me of course. All you have to cling to is the hope
> >>> >> >> >they're wrong.
>
> >>> >> >> I've provided cites that shows the government expects the deficit to
> >>> >> >> increase not decrease.
>
> >>> >> >You did no such thing of course. you provided cites where the experts
> >>> >> >say it will decrease but, of course, they could be wrong. Not the
> >>> >> >same. Poor poor desperate rightard kook cannot understand.
>
> >>> >> Actually you'd be wrong in that statement so I'll just stop here and
> >>> >> move on.
>
> >>> >Actually I was correct in that statement and that is why you RUN AWAY
> >>> >in defeat with no refutation. That wasn't even a decent try, nut job.
>
> >>> As I stated, I did not provide cites for the claim you said I made
> >>> since I never made it. I *did* however provide cites that the
> >>> government's numbers show that the deficit is expected to *Increase*.
>
> >>You did not of course. I proved the opposite. Please try to keep up
> >>with your betters, kook.
>
> >Cite the exact article where you did what you claim. We'll wait.
>
> <crickets.wav>
Awwww, da widdle puppy dog can't stand it when his master steps away
from your compulsive usenet posting. Hint: I will kick your ass
whenever I am good and ready. Some of us actually have lives. <snicker>