GW Chimpzilla's Eye-Rack Neocon Utopia
7/26/2007 6:25:00 PM
Grendel wrote:
> On Jul 26, 12:03 pm, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
> <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net> wrote:
>> "Grendel" <wstho...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1185469143.650925.149820@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jul 26, 11:52 am, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
>> > <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> "Grendel" <wstho...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:1185468621.801443.264880@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On Jul 26, 11:29 am, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
>> >> > <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> >> "Daniel" <sabot12...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>news:1185467251.283930.84710@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> >> > On Jul 26, 12:16 pm, "Gandalf Grey" <gandalfg...@infectedmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> A Republic If We Can Keep It.
>>
>> >> >> >> By Ernest Partridge
>> >> >> >> Created Jul 25 2007 - 10:16am
>>
>> >> >> >> Why not impeach?
>>
>> >> >> > because he hasn't committed an impeachable offense.
>>
>> >> >> Wiretapping the telephone of an American without
>> >> >> any warrant is a FELONY!
>>
>> >> > It has not been determined that the NSA warrentless wiretapping
>> >> > program was legal or illegal. Both postitions have been argued. The
>> >> > Department of Justice's viewpoint is
>>
>> >> "Department of Justice"
>>
>> >> You're taking about Gonzo...
>> >> I rest my case!
>>
>> >> Pointing out that a corrupt Son-Of-A-Bitch
>> >> supports something means absolutely nothing
>> >> to me.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > It may not mean 'nuthin' to you.
>>
>> If you had even half a brain you would support
>> removing Bush for these illegal wiretaps also!
>
> So you didn't mind when Clinton did the same thing? Or Carter? Or
> Nixon?
>
>> No conservative supports Big Brother! Yet you do...
>>
>> Explain that one
>
> Simple, there are elements in our society who would harm our society.
> Anyone who claims otherwise is an idiot. They need to be ferretted
> out and disposed of. I see no problem tapping the call if one end of
> the call is a known terrorist outside the United States (which is the
> scope of the program).
>
That isn't the scope of the program.
> It is the responsibility of the Government to protect its citizens.
> It should use as many tools as it has at it's disposal. Am I worried
> about the NSA wiretapping my phone? No, I haven't given any reason to
> suspect me, so the chances of them tapping my phone are remote.
You're shameful, weak and afraid of the 'terrorists so much that you're willing
to cede the freedom of American citizenship to Big Brother. In fact, you're
willing to cede your citizenship and become a mere subject of your overlords.
There hasn't been an honest conservative since Goldwater. The whole philosphy is
a pipedream and inconsistent with the reality of American politics.
> If
> they DO tap my phone, they will learn the important information that I
> order a Deep Pan Supreme Pizza on average of twice a year, and that my
> fiance loves me.
>
> If you think that your phone lines are secure, from the government or
> anyone else, you are naive. ANY form of communication can be
> intercepted. To believe that any is sacred is purely stupid.
>
> But, then we depend on Terrorists and Liberals being stupid.
>
> Yol Bolsun,
> Grendel.
>
> "Have all the opinions you want. They're free. Just don't confuse
> them with reality."-Solomon Short.
--
There are only two kinds of Republicans: Millionaires and fools.