[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

ONENESS TEMPLE NEMAM

ANJALI

6/7/2008 6:17:00 PM

http://onenesstemplenemam.bl...
http://bankruptcy5.blo...
http://filingbankruptcy1.blo...
http://bankruptcyattorney1.blo...
http://personalbankruptcy1.blo...
http://chapter13bankruptcy1.blo...
10 Answers

Killing, Inc.

12/18/2010 4:49:00 AM

0



Phlip wrote:
> On Dec 17, 8:11 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the
> > entitlements are the most important part to Democrats.
>
> Is that why every GOP/teaparty candidate who can do so has already
> broken their campaign promise to bag the earmarks?

You do know that earmarks and entitlements are not the same thing,
don't you?
Of course you don't. You're a leftard.

Killing, Inc.

12/18/2010 5:58:00 AM

0



5864 Dead, 1007 since 1/20/09 wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:48:44 -0800, Killing, Inc. wrote:
>
> > Phlip wrote:
> >> On Dec 17, 8:11 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the
> >> > entitlements are the most important part to Democrats.
> >>
> >> Is that why every GOP/teaparty candidate who can do so has already
> >> broken their campaign promise to bag the earmarks?
> >
> > You do know that earmarks and entitlements are not the same thing, don't
> > you?
> > Of course you don't. You're a leftard.
>
> Republicans are already trying to make "exceptions" for their own pet ear
> marks.

You clearly don't know the difference either. But then again, you are
responding right on cue to your own sockpuppet "Phlip," so you're just
one person trying to be doubly stupid.

PS - Did I spell your sock's name correctly this time? I know how
misspelling you sock names puts you in a tizzy.

100 Million Dead

12/18/2010 6:07:00 AM

0

"5864 Dead, 1007 since 1/20/09" <dead@gone.com> wrote :

> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:48:44 -0800, Killing, Inc. wrote:
>
>> Phlip wrote:
>>> On Dec 17, 8:11??pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the
>>> > entitlements are the most important part to Democrats.
>>>
>>> Is that why every GOP/teaparty candidate who can do so has already
>>> broken their campaign promise to bag the earmarks?
>>
>> You do know that earmarks and entitlements are not the same thing, don't
>> you?
>> Of course you don't. You're a leftard.
>
> Republicans are already trying to make "exceptions" for their own pet ear
> marks.
>
> It's cute, the way they tug on your nose ring and you follow, just like a
> puppy.
>

Bogus issue anyway, being earmarks are 0.5% of the budget.



--
- 100 Million Dead
In the last century, from various forms of socialism!

rfischer

12/18/2010 8:11:00 AM

0

Killing, Inc. <i.am.killing.inc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Harry Hope wrote:
>> http://clearstreammedia.blogspot.com/2010/12/should-signal-end-of-republican-...
>>
>> Should Signal the End of the Republican Party
>>
>> This truly is unbelievable-
>>
>> Senate Republicans filibustering to prevent help from going to 9/11
>> first responders.
>>
>> But they did get their tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.
>>
>> Tea Party wake up!
>>
>> If these people are willing to let 9/11 heroes die- do you think they
>> really care about you?
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>>
>> An example of wasting one's breath on idiots
>>
>> Harry
>
>Republicans should open the next Congress with the same bill, except
>with all Republican sponsors and without the massive Democrat
>entitlements and no amendments allowed, and see how many Democrats

Lay off the drugs, rightard. They're making you insane.

--
Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying
rfischer@sonic.net | The new GOP ideal

Killing, Inc.

12/18/2010 9:44:00 AM

0



5864 Dead, 1007 since 1/20/09 wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:11:15 -0800, Killing, Inc. wrote:
>
> > Harry Hope wrote:
> >> http://clearstreammedia.blogspot.com/2010/12/should-sign...
> republican-party.html
> >>
> >> Should Signal the End of the Republican Party
> >>
> >> This truly is unbelievable-
> >>
> >> Senate Republicans filibustering to prevent help from going to 9/11
> >> first responders.
> >>
> >> But they did get their tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.
> >>
> >> Tea Party wake up!
> >>
> >> If these people are willing to let 9/11 heroes die- do you think they
> >> really care about you?
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________
> >>
> >> An example of wasting one's breath on idiots
> >>
> >> Harry
> >
> > Republicans should open the next Congress with the same bill, except
> > with all Republican sponsors and without the massive Democrat
> > entitlements and no amendments allowed, and see how many Democrats vote
> > for it.
> > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the entitlements
> > are the most important part to Democrats.
>
> The exact same bill? Really?

No, not the exact same bill. If you can't read and comprehend, stop
posting and responding, leftard.

Tim Crowley

12/18/2010 11:22:00 AM

0

On Dec 18, 1:43 am, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 5864 Dead, 1007 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:11:15 -0800, Killing, Inc. wrote:
>
> > > Harry Hope wrote:
> > >>http://clearstreammedia.blogspot.com/2010/12/should-sign...
> > republican-party.html
>
> > >> Should Signal the End of the Republican Party
>
> > >> This truly is unbelievable-
>
> > >> Senate Republicans filibustering to prevent help from going to 9/11
> > >> first responders.
>
> > >> But they did get their tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.
>
> > >> Tea Party wake up!
>
> > >> If these people are willing to let 9/11 heroes die- do you think they
> > >> really care about you?
>
> > >> ______________________________________________
>
> > >> An example of wasting one's breath on idiots
>
> > >> Harry
>
> > > Republicans should open the next Congress with the same bill, except
> > > with all Republican sponsors and without the massive Democrat
> > > entitlements and no amendments allowed, and see how many Democrats vote
> > > for it.
> > > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the entitlements
> > > are the most important part to Democrats.
>
> > The exact same bill?  Really?
>
> No, not the exact same bill. If you can't read and comprehend, stop
> posting and responding, leftard.

hint: you lost.

killing, inc. bbuahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

fucking coward.

Tim Crowley

12/18/2010 11:24:00 AM

0

On Dec 17, 8:11 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Harry Hope wrote:
> >http://clearstreammedia.blogspot.com/2010/12/should-signal-......
>
> > Should Signal the End of the Republican Party
>
> > This truly is unbelievable-
>
> > Senate Republicans filibustering to prevent help from going to 9/11
> > first responders.
>
> > But they did get their tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires.
>
> > Tea Party wake up!
>
> > If these people are willing to let 9/11 heroes die- do you think they
> > really care about you?
>
> > ______________________________________________
>
> > An example of wasting one's breath on idiots
>
> > Harry
>
> Republicans should open the next Congress with the same bill, except
> with all Republican sponsors and without the massive Democrat
> entitlements

Tell me little "killing, inc" - what exactly were the entitlements in
this bill.

I'll wait.

waiting
waiting
waiting
waiting

Oh, did the little killing inc lie again. Oh yes he did.

Tim Crowley

12/18/2010 11:25:00 AM

0

On Dec 17, 8:48 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Phlip wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 8:11 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the
> > > entitlements are the most important part to Democrats.
>
> > Is that why every GOP/teaparty candidate who can do so has already
> > broken their campaign promise to bag the earmarks?
>
> You do know that earmarks and entitlements are not the same thing,
> don't you?
> Of course you don't. You're a leftard.

so what entitlements were in the bill

waiting
waiting
waiting
waiting

oh, the little "killing, inc" lied again. how cute.

Tim Crowley

12/18/2010 11:26:00 AM

0

On Dec 17, 9:58 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 5864 Dead, 1007 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:48:44 -0800, Killing, Inc. wrote:
>
> > > Phlip wrote:
> > >> On Dec 17, 8:11 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the
> > >> > entitlements are the most important part to Democrats.
>
> > >> Is that why every GOP/teaparty candidate who can do so has already
> > >> broken their campaign promise to bag the earmarks?
>
> > > You do know that earmarks and entitlements are not the same thing, don't
> > > you?
> > > Of course you don't. You're a leftard.
>
> > Republicans are already trying to make "exceptions" for their own pet ear
> > marks.
>
> You clearly don't know the difference either. But then again, you are
> responding right on cue to your own sockpuppet "Phlip," so you're just
> one person trying to be doubly stupid.
>
> PS - Did I spell your sock's name correctly this time? I know how
> misspelling you sock names puts you in a tizzy.

what entitlements are in the bill, bitch.

answer the question. do it now.

buahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, poor little coward got busted
in another stupid lie.

Steve

12/18/2010 1:35:00 PM

0

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:27:38 -0600, "5864 Dead, 1007 since 1/20/09"
<dead@gone.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:58:07 -0800, Killing, Inc. wrote:
>
>> 5864 Dead, 1007 since 1/20/09 wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:48:44 -0800, Killing, Inc. wrote:
>>>
>>> > Phlip wrote:
>>> >> On Dec 17, 8:11?pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > The smart money says almost none of them will, because the
>>> >> > entitlements are the most important part to Democrats.
>>> >>
>>> >> Is that why every GOP/teaparty candidate who can do so has already
>>> >> broken their campaign promise to bag the earmarks?
>>> >
>>> > You do know that earmarks and entitlements are not the same thing,
>>> > don't you?
>>> > Of course you don't. You're a leftard.
>>>
>>> Republicans are already trying to make "exceptions" for their own pet
>>> ear marks.
>>
>> You clearly don't know the difference either. But then again, you are
>> responding right on cue to your own sockpuppet "Phlip," so you're just
>> one person trying to be doubly stupid.
>>
>When you've lost the battle, bluster harder. This can't be helping your
>blood pressure, though.

Says David (Zepp) Jamieson, who reached new heights of bluster every
time he loses...



Here's another stupid claim from Zepp about the Constitution.

"Incidently, the fact that the Constitution specifies that people have
a right to vote in a presidential election pretty much takes the
choice of having [a presidential election] out of the hands of the states."
--David B.(Zepp) Jamieson Sun, Sep 3 2006
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/efb4fcac7b1561cb?...

....and here's proof of Zepp's ignorance.

"Today, Electors are chosen by popular election, but the Constitution
does not mandate a popular election. The 14th Amendment does mention
the choosing of Electors, but is relevant only when Electors are
elected by popular vote. There is similar mention in the 24th
Amendment. In other words, Electors could be appointed by a state's
legislature, or the legislature could empower the governor to choose
electors. In some cases, state law allows for such appointments if the
popular vote cannot be used to determine a winner, such as if election
results are contested up to federally-mandated deadlines."
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop...