[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Ruby/Tk on 64 bit Centos 4.4

v.srikrishnan@gmail.com

2/4/2007 10:42:00 AM

Hi all,
I installed ruby 1.8.5 on Centos 4.4 running on Xeon processors.
Installation is very nice; no problems. make check/test was also ok.
however when i try to include tk, there is a problem:
irb(main):001:0> require 'tk'
LoadError: no such file to load -- tk
from (irb):1:in `require'
from (irb):1
however, there is a tk.rb at /usr/lib64/ruby/1.8/tk.rb.
so i gave the full path. then he same error is repeated with tcltk.rb
Could anyone help me out with this?
Thanks
krishnan

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....
12 Answers

John Galt

11/22/2010 1:05:00 PM

0

On 11/20/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/16/2010 07:37 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>> http://twitpic....
>>>
>>> The GOP plan shifts the burden to the poor by the entire volume of the
>>> red on the right.
>>
>> Of course, if you draw that graph using % of income rather than gross
>> dollars, the entire graph inverts. It's not as dramatic as the one you
>> have, but on a percentage of gross income basis, Bush's tax cuts
>> benefitted the lower brackets more than the upper.
>
> Is that why the rich got a lot richer and everybody else got poorer?

No, it's because you 'bats allowed the teachers unions to turn our
educational system into shit. If Johnny can't read, Johnny's getting a
good deal if he makes minimum wage.

Our dropout rate is twice that of the other developed countries. There's
no such thing as a tax system "progressive" enough to prevent the
rich/poor divide from growing under those circumstances.

Wake up and smell the fucking coffee, Ray.

JG

DeepDudu

11/22/2010 2:10:00 PM

0

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:05:25 -0600, John Galt <kady101@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 11/20/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
>> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2010 07:37 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>> http://twitpic....
>>>>
>>>> The GOP plan shifts the burden to the poor by the entire volume of the
>>>> red on the right.
>>>
>>> Of course, if you draw that graph using % of income rather than gross
>>> dollars, the entire graph inverts. It's not as dramatic as the one you
>>> have, but on a percentage of gross income basis, Bush's tax cuts
>>> benefitted the lower brackets more than the upper.
>>
>> Is that why the rich got a lot richer and everybody else got poorer?
>
>No, it's because you 'bats allowed the teachers unions to turn our
>educational system into shit. If Johnny can't read, Johnny's getting a
>good deal if he makes minimum wage.


That's not what the problem is with the educational system you
ignorant fuck. It's funding. You right wingers don't want to fund
the educational system instead you want to censor it. Right wingers
are completely anti-education because all the stats show the more
educated someone gets the less likely they are to be a conservative.

But of course I understand why you can't grasp the reality of this,
for what it's worth.

>
>Our dropout rate is twice that of the other developed countries. There's
>no such thing as a tax system "progressive" enough to prevent the
>rich/poor divide from growing under those circumstances.
>
>Wake up and smell the fucking coffee, Ray.
>
>JG
>
>

John Galt

11/22/2010 2:30:00 PM

0

On 11/22/2010 08:09 AM, Deep Dudu wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:05:25 -0600, John Galt<kady101@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/16/2010 07:37 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>>> http://twitpic....
>>>>>
>>>>> The GOP plan shifts the burden to the poor by the entire volume of the
>>>>> red on the right.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, if you draw that graph using % of income rather than gross
>>>> dollars, the entire graph inverts. It's not as dramatic as the one you
>>>> have, but on a percentage of gross income basis, Bush's tax cuts
>>>> benefitted the lower brackets more than the upper.
>>>
>>> Is that why the rich got a lot richer and everybody else got poorer?
>>
>> No, it's because you 'bats allowed the teachers unions to turn our
>> educational system into shit. If Johnny can't read, Johnny's getting a
>> good deal if he makes minimum wage.
>
>
> That's not what the problem is with the educational system you
> ignorant fuck. It's funding.

I love it when ignorant fucks call other people "ignorant fucks."

Here's the close, you ignorant fuck:

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/edu_spe_per_sec_sch_stu-spending-per-secondary-scho...

You can clearly see that Americans are spending more on a per-pupil
basis than everyone except for Switzerland and Austria.

Now go get mommy to dry your tears. Sucks to be embarrassed in public, I
know.


You right wingers don't want to fund
> the educational system instead you want to censor it. Right wingers
> are completely anti-education because all the stats show the more
> educated someone gets the less likely they are to be a conservative.

What a joke. You know damn well that without the uneducated urban poor
defining themselves as "liberal", you guys couldn't get a dogcatcher
elected.

JG


>
> But of course I understand why you can't grasp the reality of this,
> for what it's worth.
>
>>
>> Our dropout rate is twice that of the other developed countries. There's
>> no such thing as a tax system "progressive" enough to prevent the
>> rich/poor divide from growing under those circumstances.
>>
>> Wake up and smell the fucking coffee, Ray.
>>
>> JG
>>
>>
>

Man of Mind

11/22/2010 3:22:00 PM

0

On 11/22/2010 7:05 AM, John Galt wrote:
>
> On 11/20/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
>>
>> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/16/2010 07:37 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>> http://twitpic....
>>>>
>>>> The GOP plan shifts the burden to the poor by the entire volume of the
>>>> red on the right.
>>>
>>> Of course, if you draw that graph using % of income rather than gross
>>> dollars, the entire graph inverts. It's not as dramatic as the one you
>>> have, but on a percentage of gross income basis, Bush's tax cuts
>>> benefitted the lower brackets more than the upper.
>>
>> Is that why the rich got a lot richer and everybody else got poorer?
>
> No, it's because you 'bats allowed the teachers unions

You seem to forget that there was clearly a "conservative" effort
to infiltrate the school boards and PTO's so as to get 'faith-based'
educational agenda in place. That you're attempting to demonize
the "teachers unions" instead of the so-called "conservatives"
is just plain dishonest on your behalf..

> Our dropout rate is twice that of the other developed countries

And we're behind in math, sciences and engineering disciplines, why?

I think that the right-wing complains to much about the 'dumbing
down of America', if only to avoid being mentioned as the root cause..

> There's no such thing as a tax system "progressive" enough to
> prevent the rich/poor divide from growing under those circumstances.

Let me guess.. You're really bad at math..

--You entertain some really silly notions about economics..

Phlip

11/22/2010 3:28:00 PM

0

On Nov 22, 7:22 am, Man_of_Mind <baron.von.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> You seem to forget that there was clearly a "conservative" effort
> to infiltrate the school boards and PTO's so as to get 'faith-based'
> educational agenda in place.  That you're attempting to demonize
> the "teachers unions" instead of the so-called "conservatives"
> is just plain dishonest on your behalf..

In socialist hell-holes like Japan, elementary school teachers are
paid similar to, and given the respect of, doctors and lawyers.

Hence, no union squabbling over dwindling resources. And hence, no
blaming the union squabbling on the dwindling resource.

Hmm. Where have we seen THAT game before?

Meanwhile, "John Galt" fixates on the extreme rich with a sickening
reverse class envy...

John Galt

11/23/2010 1:31:00 AM

0

On 11/22/2010 08:22 AM, Man_of_Mind wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 7:05 AM, John Galt wrote:
>>
>> On 11/20/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/16/2010 07:37 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>>> http://twitpic....
>>>>>
>>>>> The GOP plan shifts the burden to the poor by the entire volume of the
>>>>> red on the right.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, if you draw that graph using % of income rather than gross
>>>> dollars, the entire graph inverts. It's not as dramatic as the one you
>>>> have, but on a percentage of gross income basis, Bush's tax cuts
>>>> benefitted the lower brackets more than the upper.
>>>
>>> Is that why the rich got a lot richer and everybody else got poorer?
>>
>> No, it's because you 'bats allowed the teachers unions
>
> You seem to forget that there was clearly a "conservative" effort
> to infiltrate the school boards and PTO's so as to get 'faith-based'
> educational agenda in place.

There is indeed. However, social conservatives aren't really
conservatives, by definition, since issue conservatives lean libertarian
on such matters.

That you're attempting to demonize
> the "teachers unions" instead of the so-called "conservatives"
> is just plain dishonest on your behalf.

Hang on.

The subject here is WHY a rich/poor divide exists. Whatever the socons
have done WRT faith-based education has been a failure 98% of the time.
ERGO, THEY cannot be at fault for the crappy state of our schools.
HOWEVER, the union presence in education is pervasive throughout, and
they consistently oppose accountability measures that look to improve
the state of HS education.

Therefore, it is certainly *not* dishonest to raise them as the cause,
just because some socons have failed at social

>
>> Our dropout rate is twice that of the other developed countries
>
> And we're behind in math, sciences and engineering disciplines, why?

See above.
>
> I think that the right-wing complains to much about the 'dumbing
> down of America', if only to avoid being mentioned as the root cause..

LOL. It's the right wing's fault because they've failed to get
faith-based curricula passed? :-)
>
>> There's no such thing as a tax system "progressive" enough to
>> prevent the rich/poor divide from growing under those circumstances.
>
> Let me guess.. You're really bad at math..
>
> --You entertain some really silly notions about economics.

All the 'bats say that. It allows them to avoid a rational discussion of
the issues. You're true to form.

JG

Yoorghis

11/23/2010 2:40:00 AM

0

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:30:38 -0700, John Galt <kady101@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> You seem to forget that there was clearly a "conservative" effort
>> to infiltrate the school boards and PTO's so as to get 'faith-based'
>> educational agenda in place.
>
>There is indeed. However, social conservatives aren't really
>conservatives, by definition, since issue conservatives lean libertarian
>on such matters.

You do know that loonytarian crap was a failure, and discredited as
any kind of credible public policy a century ago, don't you GaltLoon?

John Galt

11/23/2010 3:09:00 AM

0

On 11/22/2010 07:39 PM, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:30:38 -0700, John Galt<kady101@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> You seem to forget that there was clearly a "conservative" effort
>>> to infiltrate the school boards and PTO's so as to get 'faith-based'
>>> educational agenda in place.
>>
>> There is indeed. However, social conservatives aren't really
>> conservatives, by definition, since issue conservatives lean libertarian
>> on such matters.
>
> You do know that loonytarian crap was a failure, and discredited as
> any kind of credible public policy a century ago, don't you GaltLoon?

So, you support social conservative issues.

Man, are you warped.

JG

rfischer

11/23/2010 8:15:00 AM

0

John Galt <kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/20/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
>> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/16/2010 07:37 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>> http://twitpic....
>>>>
>>>> The GOP plan shifts the burden to the poor by the entire volume of the
>>>> red on the right.
>>>
>>> Of course, if you draw that graph using % of income rather than gross
>>> dollars, the entire graph inverts. It's not as dramatic as the one you
>>> have, but on a percentage of gross income basis, Bush's tax cuts
>>> benefitted the lower brackets more than the upper.
>>
>> Is that why the rich got a lot richer and everybody else got poorer?
>
>No, it's because you 'bats allowed the teachers unions to turn our

And the rightard shows that he's really nothing more than a hate
corrupted asshole.

--
Ray Fischer | Mendacracy (n.) government by lying
rfischer@sonic.net | The new GOP ideal

John Galt

11/23/2010 2:33:00 PM

0

On 11/23/2010 01:15 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:
> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/20/2010 06:57 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> John Galt<kady101@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/16/2010 07:37 PM, Phlip wrote:
>>>>> http://twitpic....
>>>>>
>>>>> The GOP plan shifts the burden to the poor by the entire volume of the
>>>>> red on the right.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, if you draw that graph using % of income rather than gross
>>>> dollars, the entire graph inverts. It's not as dramatic as the one you
>>>> have, but on a percentage of gross income basis, Bush's tax cuts
>>>> benefitted the lower brackets more than the upper.
>>>
>>> Is that why the rich got a lot richer and everybody else got poorer?
>>
>> No, it's because you 'bats allowed the teachers unions to turn our
>
> And the rightard shows that he's really nothing more than a hate
> corrupted asshole.

How's that? If you oppose unionization, you're "a hate corrupted
asshole?" :-)

What a jerk you are.

JG