[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Enumerated Types

Dan Stevens (IAmAI)

2/3/2007 6:52:00 PM

As part of a solution, I wish the value of an attribute to be one of a
finite set of values, in other words I believe I want an 'enumerated
type'. I've look at the 'Enumerable' and 'Enumerator' class and they
appear to me to be unrelated to what I wish to achieve (correct me if
I'm wrong).

I could do the traditional method of named constants with integer
values but I can't help feeling that there must be a class or some
nice method of doing this. Any advice would be appreciated.

4 Answers

Robert Klemme

2/3/2007 6:58:00 PM

0

On 03.02.2007 19:52, Dan Stevens (IAmAI) wrote:
> As part of a solution, I wish the value of an attribute to be one of a
> finite set of values, in other words I believe I want an 'enumerated
> type'. I've look at the 'Enumerable' and 'Enumerator' class and they
> appear to me to be unrelated to what I wish to achieve (correct me if
> I'm wrong).
>
> I could do the traditional method of named constants with integer
> values but I can't help feeling that there must be a class or some
> nice method of doing this. Any advice would be appreciated.

I believe there are enum classes in the RAA. If you do not want to use
them, symbols come pretty close:

class YourClass
YOUR_ENUM = [
:old,
:young,
:unknown,
].freeze
end

HTH

Kind regards

robert

Dan Stevens (IAmAI)

2/5/2007 7:54:00 PM

0

It seems to me that I should simply be able to use symbols as values
for my enumerated types, like for example:

class Color

def initialize(color)
@color = color
end

def to_hex
case @color
when :red: 0xFF0000
when :green: 0x00FF00
when :blue: 0x0000FF
else @color
end
end

end

c = Color.new(:red)
puts c.to_hex.to_s(16)

Might there be any reason why I shouldn't do this, or am I quite fine
doing this?


On 03/02/07, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 03.02.2007 19:52, Dan Stevens (IAmAI) wrote:
> > As part of a solution, I wish the value of an attribute to be one of a
> > finite set of values, in other words I believe I want an 'enumerated
> > type'. I've look at the 'Enumerable' and 'Enumerator' class and they
> > appear to me to be unrelated to what I wish to achieve (correct me if
> > I'm wrong).
> >
> > I could do the traditional method of named constants with integer
> > values but I can't help feeling that there must be a class or some
> > nice method of doing this. Any advice would be appreciated.
>
> I believe there are enum classes in the RAA. If you do not want to use
> them, symbols come pretty close:
>
> class YourClass
> YOUR_ENUM = [
> :old,
> :young,
> :unknown,
> ].freeze
> end
>
> HTH
>
> Kind regards
>
> robert
>
>

Garance A Drosehn

2/5/2007 11:34:00 PM

0

On 2/3/07, Dan Stevens (IAmAI) <dan.stevens.iamai@gmail.com> wrote:
> As part of a solution, I wish the value of an attribute to be one of a
> finite set of values, in other words I believe I want an 'enumerated
> type'. I've look at the 'Enumerable' and 'Enumerator' class and they
> appear to me to be unrelated to what I wish to achieve (correct me if
> I'm wrong).
>
> I could do the traditional method of named constants with integer
> values but I can't help feeling that there must be a class or some
> nice method of doing this. Any advice would be appreciated.

I picked up this snippet of code:

# -------+---------+---------+-------- + --------+---------+---------+---------+
# Add methods enum and bit_enum to the Object class, thus making it much
# easier and less error-prone to define a long list of constants in a
# class. This idea comes from Ara.T.Howard@noaa, in a posting to ruby-talk
# on August 2, 2005 (in reply to a question). These work very nicely with
# a word-list array as generated via %w(). Very clever!
#
class Object
def enum_constants(*list)
mc = Module === self ? self : self.class
list.flatten.each_with_index{|e, i| mc.const_set e.to_s.intern, i}
end
def enum_bit_constants(*list)
mc = Module === self ? self : self.class
list.flatten.each_with_index{|e, i| mc.const_set e.to_s.intern, 2 ** i}
end
end
# -------+---------+---------+-------- + --------+---------+---------+---------+

An example of using it:

# Constants that define all categories of packets which we recognize.
enum_constants %w(
SBC_NONE SBC_ARRAY SBC_NONUSER SBC_NO_IDSTR
SBC_IGNFAIL SBC_ALL
SBC_UNMATCHED )

The difference between enum_constants() and enum_bit_constants is
that enum_constants will define the values as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc, while
enum_bit_constants will define them as 1,2,4,8,16,32. You can 'or'
the enum_bit_constant values together, and each one is a separate
bit so it won't clobber any other bit constant.

If you are not used to the %w() method of quoting, note that you only
put the names you want in there. You do *not* separate them with
commas!

--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosihn@gmail.com
Senior Systems Programmer
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA

Robert Klemme

2/6/2007 8:45:00 PM

0

On 05.02.2007 20:54, Dan Stevens (IAmAI) wrote:
> It seems to me that I should simply be able to use symbols as values
> for my enumerated types, like for example:
>
> class Color
>
> def initialize(color)
> @color = color
> end
>
> def to_hex
> case @color
> when :red: 0xFF0000
> when :green: 0x00FF00
> when :blue: 0x0000FF
> else @color
> end
> end
>
> end
>
> c = Color.new(:red)
> puts c.to_hex.to_s(16)
>
> Might there be any reason why I shouldn't do this, or am I quite fine
> doing this?

That's perfectly ok. If you need your enums only for mapping then I'd
probably do this:

Color = Struct.new :name do
CODES = Hash.new {|h,k| k}.update(
:red => 0xFF0000,
:green => 0x00FF00
# ...
)

def to_hex; CODES[name] end
end

irb(main):010:0> Color.new(:red).to_hex.to_s 16
=> "ff0000"

If you need more enum dependent behavior you might want put more complex
objects into the hash instead of only Fixnums.

Kind regards

robert