[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

[ANN] RubyCocoa 0.10.1 Developer Preview

Laurent Sansonetti

1/9/2007 2:39:00 PM

Hi,

We are pleased to announce RubyCocoa 0.10.1 Developer Preview, which
is a very quick bugfixes release for 0.10.0. Users who installed
0.10.0 are encouraged to upgrade to this release.

RubyCocoa is a Mac OS X framework that allows Cocoa programming in the
object-oriented scripting language Ruby. In other words, it is a
bridge that let you access Objective-C objects from Ruby, and
vice-versa.

You can get more details about RubyCocoa 0.10.0, such as the
description of the changes against the stable branch and pointers to
the binary installer and source release tarball, at the following
location:

http://rubycocoa.sourc.../doc...

Please notice that this is still a developer preview of RubyCocoa. You
should not use it for real-world deployments. It is delivered to you
only for testing purposes.

Please also visit the following web sites to get more general
information about RubyCocoa:

http://rubycocoa.sourc...
http://rub...

Following are the releases notes. Enjoy!

Bugfixes:
- Fixed a bug when overriding methods in a class that has not been
imported yet, by making sure the methods will be binded to the right
classes ;
- Fixed a bug when using #objc_send to reach a method without argument ;
- Fixed a bug when importing classes within modules when the OSX
module is mixed in the top-level object ;
- Fixed bugs to allow #ns_import and #require_framework to be called
when the OSX module is mixed in the top-level object.

--
The RubyCocoa team.
6 Answers

HvT

10/26/2012 11:13:00 AM

0

Al Eisner wrote:
> I've heard the work a number of times in concert, the most impressive
> of them being by Alexeev a few years ago. There's a 1997 (I think)
> recording, on a 2-CD set with late Brahms pieces (available at a
> decent used price at Amazon US). Since he didn't appear at all in
> the survey, I'm curious if anyone has heard this and can comment.
> Thanks.

It's from 1977 and 1996. The interpretations are excellent. It's just a
matter of taste that I prefer Kempff in Brahms and Anda in Schumann
(Salzurg, WDR, BBC).

Gramophone praises Alexeev for his vibrant Brahms and for the exceptional
continuity and unity of his Schumann. For once I fully agree.

Henk


Al Eisner

10/26/2012 9:05:00 PM

0

Al Eisner

10/26/2012 9:11:00 PM

0

HvT

10/27/2012 9:53:00 AM

0

Al Eisner wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, HvT wrote:
>
>> Al Eisner wrote:
>>> I've heard the work a number of times in concert, the most
>>> impressive of them being by Alexeev a few years ago. There's a
>>> 1997 (I think) recording, on a 2-CD set with late Brahms pieces
>>> (available at a decent used price at Amazon US). Since he didn't
>>> appear at all in the survey, I'm curious if anyone has heard this
>>> and can comment. Thanks.
>>
>> It's from 1977 and 1996. The interpretations are excellent. It's
>> just a matter of taste that I prefer Kempff in Brahms and Anda in
>> Schumann (Salzurg, WDR, BBC).
>>
>> Gramophone praises Alexeev for his vibrant Brahms and for the
>> exceptional continuity and unity of his Schumann. For once I fully
>> agree.
>
> Thanks. That very much matches what I heard from him in concert.
> Do you know which works on the set are from which year?

Brahms Op. 76 and Op. 116 was recorded in 1979, Brahms Op. 117-119 in 1976
and Schumann in 1987.

Henk


Rugby

10/27/2012 11:59:00 AM

0

>On Oct 26, 12:00 pm, Robert Marshall <s...@capuchin.co.uk> wrote:

> Are the podcasts not available outside the UK?

BBC3 will let me listen from the USA to live and to the week of "
listen again" , but not download podcasts as "available only to UK
listeners." BBC4 wont let me listen at all. Fine, as I pay no license.
BBC also wont let me comment in their occasional listener surveys,
which many here would probably agree is a good BBC decision.

herman

10/27/2012 1:13:00 PM

0

Le vendredi 26 octobre 2012 23:10:41 UTC+2, Al Eisner a écrit :

> By the way,
>
> while the indiividual volumes are fancily packaged, it's largely show
>
> rather than substance (I'm picking up on an earlier comment on the
>
> LeSage set), and I don't think the program notes are very good -- so
>
> whatever comes or doesn't come with the set won't be a great loss.
>
I agree. The notes don't seem to be up to snuff on the more recent biographical scholarship I'm familiar with. So getting the integrale box is a good idea - it just so happened I have too many single releases already to do so. And I'm a sucker for a pretty cover, alas.