[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

mini-contest: try to crack this snippet ("Happy 2007!" Ruby challenge

Mauricio Fernández

1/6/2007 8:00:00 PM

http://eige.../rubycha...

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find the secret message
hidden in a Ruby script, follow the instructions to generate the code that
will prove you've found the message, and report it via eigenclass.org (more
details at the above address).

This script works with Ruby 1.8.5 (also tested with -p12); alternative
versions for Ruby 1.8.2, 1.8.3 and 1.8.4 are also available.
If you want to try to crack the script, it's safer to download it from
http://eige.../rubycha... (cut&paste fails too often...)

One request: please don't publish your hints/solutions --- let's try to keep
the challenge interesting for future readers. Thank you.

The script must be saved as happy2007-eigenclass.org-1.8.5.rb (exactly) and
run with Ruby 1.8.5, without RubyGems:
$ RUBYOPT="" ruby happy2007-eigenclass.org-1.8.5.rb

I hope you have fun.

#OrNYAMv67ABbqnK01lSLaHsKlmOBIwcFqzuEXezq5cAYnu6IFvAF8IBXMDCp8R7NheeL13UiFV39S
"02312ZqeVxtl3gw6NVawApA9bwn9LLGBfE/66UCuABlSFVRSr00stZa7YkchPYzsaMdQcLWp5xKCd
0BUpoXvq5vnxVMgz29HvqTrnZVpDfDpWKB3m0uCcBY4rKSFoQ3rWDi8lArMyig2/nPObKuucdhlQjt
OkQMgNXiH9l+bOmeMpiNTN8PIZoEcFFl0YwtcSXGOo4Tam21XPf7N9izo/7LAemLSG3mZ55cAgLegq
+XJoRGtDMLrDj Ho7b9Q I/IeCa60CPfzR2rTh2Ng9aNLsxYLxBUS+ZnRJHQmmjGo6v4FfBnIVZx
h0XTyv0X4+jcA wmWsmS 4cpRZ1ev7zmwvbWMFG5KZlDPoBLlgWoqe2FoDKx3q3n/UDmi6beIMdO
nz4VAxdGERKv3 cki9FT O8aHKbLlx/BlP4hcD+63B+eRpAgK58DnV4sUKvo9BCuwQqM8k6WcDqS
WP7ZNGiW8eA4y UIfsyd kX1v mUI Z FCsr A EUS ao47J GMlefa8WAd0b0UN
YsfAiDTOmWugK 9MDpTe gqE cz/7 cy l1 86M kf P6n TLf bxh5zibUMKyMmmGx
8OK5/1KjPRq1X aFUZkijk Qo Lx/Y 8R 7P38 WV ZL0 6Spf3M+okFpRQg2G
UpfuWbtyB06BH 2Eu/vZ tbS AW 8kGx It 8VEl JP UZ2 8zosYQvGPPiDJmwU
BpD+lkFRe/Piu 3kydXF Ij oHL5 ud mbSy Ti 6bwe daK a HYPybXbENNQlJoSGr
CMCxXR3KlonNk NOCefm +4 fq6H 9o Yi0S vk +a1W AWx S AT5p/7w4YkUrFIxo/
TESZLgRi1KIkw Nz4c8t NV yVB E5 eU E/h Av hev6v vd5lgvX4xykKm2PzV
EvGksbbXFjezU Ennwvv FtT K 2y J c8h+ / 8NaJwN VbFruIzmZ6A9GomBIV
1nN0eUMI5vdwTBD/034y6pP3gO9+tgY/Z+u D5oBVQlu jNK/74Mua6i RAmHBnc7jSxvMB9os7
OE0v5q0/qNXYL7jfOZJ0Pgbnvih4ViB6ZWW LGu13Bdl fV3pNN49KZ Ra1rjx0Vtd6bbnVVFyO
uzaad8w90GXhl52Q4hIkcKYeiT6TJ1O05ir eODiQFTS JRdOZ70m PhyljHwB/FPzjJvSseqW
tJab3eZ+6uRFmEwsYCc37P2/24slUQ1f7d9eDpZ4NS4rVlaeIx5qH1fvZis8SUTGi3qT4BuK/wwGJb
Dfw3dLu2uzIF4LbRzEl59Ni7EC0q/Pj0FUlY25CESpCiX7Tn8VhzJP7ObzONwpB1IptdshseudGY2F
jeivpdahI26bvOWlPzb h1f+9T IK6oAn TerM 3DRb4S3gk+PjoejtttW6Ee
PcnmtNVDNCAcOB9NV5 FWRh 38FS tp 7KCq 1k 6M4yO6ILq xVRpWPwqzICh9sav/u2Pnp
MHxn4RF3UPxPtMnRc6XxvZHX it ld1g c/u l8v5 1j7p6vM4 ltqOtjAetny2g14uvLGKYC
fAKn38RogjLz50xMtrw4aPl3 Gt 1J6e tr of90 0j35GGQ vv+TvjX4SeKRn1HPfGS8mjV
utf/Mh4BFfMdnT8xsCqPMdy IW vb0L pm KgON w0clVkY PlyjUZVqIN2spadEG40Zib7
geEI0WDd12Wfv45sont9TAE L5m BpSO 6w NfW5 Js9hP8 +UTtyV7vM75mIpxomFHjHWFT
yNDKGiMk3lJmW3RbGBmTyk c8bJ /kEZ /J cvad O3JCFi TvOhTHvMkcEkG7Rto/vzg1TD
ThuG4tBCTsMrV4enitht+ ITOE4 2Fr5 sa v9ag 7lIZw EYHMdZFbRlO8blKy1q1tOQtxZ
2hQwARL2xBVaMQayxKry FzHVyZ xCS5 go DAcn jKXp/ tkWXIhFV3uDGDgXBfPGJZ69qS
hfGaODSze+D/ixRRfeL yRMMFlkE mt t0Ig Mm fWqbV gXMbbZ7UN3GelWTpEbAsKa12W
bqDUMPbQLy16Da85we jnb/ qayEBP Jt5kDC foIihFX3rGmjv8H35nLt4bwKg7
SV2t9d9QPLEGEBIexr69FqX3fLii4UUouUUfs8RLJAHgWEoztt1tloZ8I7TsBpGtfTJntGyZdwcKEW
NW7BTaYhVj70niCV4Ws407gIjZN5gIW1XeplrvpKEOGzuN9vmynojJOdgVfVV2hgJISHMCZHYehge0
jzGCFECNwaUmxJiP80PRWWwjBY7hKnjhQjvyvhtGcNMEZAQPKYPYJcYQFIrCVjzDQmZUnZXNBu7SIy
qneV+2/f4rOxDgu56FqYA39CAgtCVQTwmrWkpFt1M1ACFnacRf9ypJgS1kEURs3xx2/dngv0YGiSZG
tiLXL3PyxR8mv21RsVCD2wA00400eNo1kFtLAzEQhd/zK8YiVKENVRBFEKEIPpWK1Ic+Zjezu6O5LJ
mEdf+9k8U+5TLnO2dm9sfj4QqUOscClmxYZ7DYFUbIA0ITfQNtTAnb7Gat3sjCLEofLXXzIhlT7JPx
EBMkDMYjUH6F0wWeyDnA39FFK5VuoW2UGOVNoLE4kysBrUkS69wMN/IyjuOFYpgGDP/gBkyGTB55Ay
L5LpwhlaAq0xsKUEImVw15iBMvHUqON5liuNXqYH4QuCSsfms5BA4U+kpMlAf4LM0Md/pJPwhnQbqq
KylcNbX2jp43SjQlMOa8fH/tz8eP07OC68v9ZbUSZ1ENZhzn+93ucYvUY2idYdYx9dslQqdGqboqxj
ZhBhmLTS/7kJkNLead7LWOToHJotZa/QG9gJR7nNQde2XvHS8rqELruQqnMCQYPOvJepTOCl79AioL
".instance_eval{|$x|def h(q)q.unpack("m*")[0]end;def k(z);Zlib::Inflate.inflate(
z)end;require'zlib';rr=eval k(h(File.read($0)[-605..-2]));ps=false;puts rr if ps
begin;class<<$<;class<<self;class<<self;def f;end;f;end end end;rescue NameError
p=lambda{rr=(rr.to_i*214013+2531011)&(2**32-1);(rr.to_i>>16)&0xff};begin v=$x.
gsub(/\s+/,"");v2="";h(v[5,k=v[0,5].to_i]).each_byte{|b|v2<<(b^p[])};eval(k(v2)
)[$x];rescue Interrupt;rescue Exception;puts k(h(v[10+k,v[5+k,5].to_i]));exit(
42);end;else$W||=SCRIPT_LINES__={};class<<$<;class<<self;class<<self;def self.x;
end end end end; load($0) end};exit
# Copyright (C) 2005-2007 Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org>
# http://eige...
# Get the hidden message and claim your prize at eigenclass.org!
__END__
eNpVUVtr2zAUZo817D+IYBOp2RSnS9ouqh/cxQ2GxYEmbLAsCFk+zbw6tifJpeTy36c4g1G9SDrn8N1O
3RjdnURf5pM4mVJKUTxN5o8RmkWLRTiNFug+ejj9wySehct4nnSZgj9NrgB1s3wD2vS32ajruN+ix/v5
IkIoQGVeOCZ4yAugCkSGXZ8wPPB9v6dEmeGR7xNCTb4FvU9hk5dMfEgDPKD0itCtqPftlKE63wE5Ul0p
w+BFFNisBKXp+tJinZGuLBCxerRsAEWvEmqTVyWDMjs6jstFsFozDYYbJSTwp6aUqFaV3B8uBT/Y/t0d
FpxmUIABLgweEiY4OTLXBJNwGbITCXv/FgFbd4TJQmiN5ulvkIY1ZQZPfAvmV5WhcY3+CbKDyEphtol3
QefTYDi6Ho461nrFc8YmbXrj8WwyoucksZV0auqeFEUB6vx2O3SjoMZ9qlK3T85Fz/vpac87XZnncf41
TiLOe9g1tK50gL3/58zXe7MOqqUosacuVuHHH2tMyfLdBWkDt97bKQv1/XDYHwm1yTegV/66Zbaba8pa
yGfcSTrEVpGHrm8G/u3tzefWLdo5fwFjGbgl1


--
Mauricio Fernandez - http://eige... - singular Ruby

7 Answers

vasudevram

1/7/2007 1:59:00 PM

0


Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
> http://eige.../rubycha...
>
> Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find the secret message
> hidden in a Ruby script, follow the instructions to generate the code that
> will prove you've found the message, and report it via eigenclass.org (more
> details at the above address).
>
> This script works with Ruby 1.8.5 (also tested with -p12); alternative
> versions for Ruby 1.8.2, 1.8.3 and 1.8.4 are also available.
> If you want to try to crack the script, it's safer to download it from
> http://eige.../rubycha... (cut&paste fails too often...)
>
> One request: please don't publish your hints/solutions --- let's try to keep
> the challenge interesting for future readers. Thank you.
>
> The script must be saved as happy2007-eigenclass.org-1.8.5.rb (exactly) and
> run with Ruby 1.8.5, without RubyGems:
> $ RUBYOPT="" ruby happy2007-eigenclass.org-1.8.5.rb
>
> I hope you have fun.
>
> #OrNYAMv67ABbqnK01lSLaHsKlmOBIwcFqzuEXezq5cAYnu6IFvAF8IBXMDCp8R7NheeL13UiFV39S
> "02312ZqeVxtl3gw6NVawApA9bwn9LLGBfE/66UCuABlSFVRSr00stZa7YkchPYzsaMdQcLWp5xKCd
> 0BUpoXvq5vnxVMgz29HvqTrnZVpDfDpWKB3m0uCcBY4rKSFoQ3rWDi8lArMyig2/nPObKuucdhlQjt
> OkQMgNXiH9l+bOmeMpiNTN8PIZoEcFFl0YwtcSXGOo4Tam21XPf7N9izo/7LAemLSG3mZ55cAgLegq
> +XJoRGtDMLrDj Ho7b9Q I/IeCa60CPfzR2rTh2Ng9aNLsxYLxBUS+ZnRJHQmmjGo6v4FfBnIVZx
> h0XTyv0X4+jcA wmWsmS 4cpRZ1ev7zmwvbWMFG5KZlDPoBLlgWoqe2FoDKx3q3n/UDmi6beIMdO
> nz4VAxdGERKv3 cki9FT O8aHKbLlx/BlP4hcD+63B+eRpAgK58DnV4sUKvo9BCuwQqM8k6WcDqS
> WP7ZNGiW8eA4y UIfsyd kX1v mUI Z FCsr A EUS ao47J GMlefa8WAd0b0UN
> YsfAiDTOmWugK 9MDpTe gqE cz/7 cy l1 86M kf P6n TLf bxh5zibUMKyMmmGx
> 8OK5/1KjPRq1X aFUZkijk Qo Lx/Y 8R 7P38 WV ZL0 6Spf3M+okFpRQg2G
> UpfuWbtyB06BH 2Eu/vZ tbS AW 8kGx It 8VEl JP UZ2 8zosYQvGPPiDJmwU
> BpD+lkFRe/Piu 3kydXF Ij oHL5 ud mbSy Ti 6bwe daK a HYPybXbENNQlJoSGr
> CMCxXR3KlonNk NOCefm +4 fq6H 9o Yi0S vk +a1W AWx S AT5p/7w4YkUrFIxo/
> TESZLgRi1KIkw Nz4c8t NV yVB E5 eU E/h Av hev6v vd5lgvX4xykKm2PzV
> EvGksbbXFjezU Ennwvv FtT K 2y J c8h+ / 8NaJwN VbFruIzmZ6A9GomBIV
> 1nN0eUMI5vdwTBD/034y6pP3gO9+tgY/Z+u D5oBVQlu jNK/74Mua6i RAmHBnc7jSxvMB9os7
> OE0v5q0/qNXYL7jfOZJ0Pgbnvih4ViB6ZWW LGu13Bdl fV3pNN49KZ Ra1rjx0Vtd6bbnVVFyO
> uzaad8w90GXhl52Q4hIkcKYeiT6TJ1O05ir eODiQFTS JRdOZ70m PhyljHwB/FPzjJvSseqW
> tJab3eZ+6uRFmEwsYCc37P2/24slUQ1f7d9eDpZ4NS4rVlaeIx5qH1fvZis8SUTGi3qT4BuK/wwGJb
> Dfw3dLu2uzIF4LbRzEl59Ni7EC0q/Pj0FUlY25CESpCiX7Tn8VhzJP7ObzONwpB1IptdshseudGY2F
> jeivpdahI26bvOWlPzb h1f+9T IK6oAn TerM 3DRb4S3gk+PjoejtttW6Ee
> PcnmtNVDNCAcOB9NV5 FWRh 38FS tp 7KCq 1k 6M4yO6ILq xVRpWPwqzICh9sav/u2Pnp
> MHxn4RF3UPxPtMnRc6XxvZHX it ld1g c/u l8v5 1j7p6vM4 ltqOtjAetny2g14uvLGKYC
> fAKn38RogjLz50xMtrw4aPl3 Gt 1J6e tr of90 0j35GGQ vv+TvjX4SeKRn1HPfGS8mjV
> utf/Mh4BFfMdnT8xsCqPMdy IW vb0L pm KgON w0clVkY PlyjUZVqIN2spadEG40Zib7
> geEI0WDd12Wfv45sont9TAE L5m BpSO 6w NfW5 Js9hP8 +UTtyV7vM75mIpxomFHjHWFT
> yNDKGiMk3lJmW3RbGBmTyk c8bJ /kEZ /J cvad O3JCFi TvOhTHvMkcEkG7Rto/vzg1TD
> ThuG4tBCTsMrV4enitht+ ITOE4 2Fr5 sa v9ag 7lIZw EYHMdZFbRlO8blKy1q1tOQtxZ
> 2hQwARL2xBVaMQayxKry FzHVyZ xCS5 go DAcn jKXp/ tkWXIhFV3uDGDgXBfPGJZ69qS
> hfGaODSze+D/ixRRfeL yRMMFlkE mt t0Ig Mm fWqbV gXMbbZ7UN3GelWTpEbAsKa12W
> bqDUMPbQLy16Da85we jnb/ qayEBP Jt5kDC foIihFX3rGmjv8H35nLt4bwKg7
> SV2t9d9QPLEGEBIexr69FqX3fLii4UUouUUfs8RLJAHgWEoztt1tloZ8I7TsBpGtfTJntGyZdwcKEW
> NW7BTaYhVj70niCV4Ws407gIjZN5gIW1XeplrvpKEOGzuN9vmynojJOdgVfVV2hgJISHMCZHYehge0
> jzGCFECNwaUmxJiP80PRWWwjBY7hKnjhQjvyvhtGcNMEZAQPKYPYJcYQFIrCVjzDQmZUnZXNBu7SIy
> qneV+2/f4rOxDgu56FqYA39CAgtCVQTwmrWkpFt1M1ACFnacRf9ypJgS1kEURs3xx2/dngv0YGiSZG
> tiLXL3PyxR8mv21RsVCD2wA00400eNo1kFtLAzEQhd/zK8YiVKENVRBFEKEIPpWK1Ic+Zjezu6O5LJ
> mEdf+9k8U+5TLnO2dm9sfj4QqUOscClmxYZ7DYFUbIA0ITfQNtTAnb7Gat3sjCLEofLXXzIhlT7JPx
> EBMkDMYjUH6F0wWeyDnA39FFK5VuoW2UGOVNoLE4kysBrUkS69wMN/IyjuOFYpgGDP/gBkyGTB55Ay
> L5LpwhlaAq0xsKUEImVw15iBMvHUqON5liuNXqYH4QuCSsfms5BA4U+kpMlAf4LM0Md/pJPwhnQbqq
> KylcNbX2jp43SjQlMOa8fH/tz8eP07OC68v9ZbUSZ1ENZhzn+93ucYvUY2idYdYx9dslQqdGqboqxj
> ZhBhmLTS/7kJkNLead7LWOToHJotZa/QG9gJR7nNQde2XvHS8rqELruQqnMCQYPOvJepTOCl79AioL
> ".instance_eval{|$x|def h(q)q.unpack("m*")[0]end;def k(z);Zlib::Inflate.inflate(
> z)end;require'zlib';rr=eval k(h(File.read($0)[-605..-2]));ps=false;puts rr if ps
> begin;class<<$<;class<<self;class<<self;def f;end;f;end end end;rescue NameError
> p=lambda{rr=(rr.to_i*214013+2531011)&(2**32-1);(rr.to_i>>16)&0xff};begin v=$x.
> gsub(/\s+/,"");v2="";h(v[5,k=v[0,5].to_i]).each_byte{|b|v2<<(b^p[])};eval(k(v2)
> )[$x];rescue Interrupt;rescue Exception;puts k(h(v[10+k,v[5+k,5].to_i]));exit(
> 42);end;else$W||=SCRIPT_LINES__={};class<<$<;class<<self;class<<self;def self.x;
> end end end end; load($0) end};exit
> # Copyright (C) 2005-2007 Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org>
> # http://eige...
> # Get the hidden message and claim your prize at eigenclass.org!
> __END__
> eNpVUVtr2zAUZo817D+IYBOp2RSnS9ouqh/cxQ2GxYEmbLAsCFk+zbw6tifJpeTy36c4g1G9SDrn8N1O
> 3RjdnURf5pM4mVJKUTxN5o8RmkWLRTiNFug+ejj9wySehct4nnSZgj9NrgB1s3wD2vS32ajruN+ix/v5
> IkIoQGVeOCZ4yAugCkSGXZ8wPPB9v6dEmeGR7xNCTb4FvU9hk5dMfEgDPKD0itCtqPftlKE63wE5Ul0p
> w+BFFNisBKXp+tJinZGuLBCxerRsAEWvEmqTVyWDMjs6jstFsFozDYYbJSTwp6aUqFaV3B8uBT/Y/t0d
> FpxmUIABLgweEiY4OTLXBJNwGbITCXv/FgFbd4TJQmiN5ulvkIY1ZQZPfAvmV5WhcY3+CbKDyEphtol3
> QefTYDi6Ho461nrFc8YmbXrj8WwyoucksZV0auqeFEUB6vx2O3SjoMZ9qlK3T85Fz/vpac87XZnncf41
> TiLOe9g1tK50gL3/58zXe7MOqqUosacuVuHHH2tMyfLdBWkDt97bKQv1/XDYHwm1yTegV/66Zbaba8pa
> yGfcSTrEVpGHrm8G/u3tzefWLdo5fwFjGbgl1
>
>
> --
> Mauricio Fernandez - http://eige... - singular Ruby

> Mauricio Fernandez - http://eige... - singular Ruby


Nice one :-)

I guess I must have a built-in Ruby interpreter in my brain. I didn't
even need to read the code, let alone write any, to get the solution
:-)

Vasudev Ram
http://www.dancin...

Mauricio Fernández

1/8/2007 12:51:00 AM

0

On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:00:21PM +0900, vasudevram wrote:
> Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
> > http://eige.../rubycha...
> >
> > Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to find the secret message
> > hidden in a Ruby script, follow the instructions to generate the code that
> > will prove you've found the message, and report it via eigenclass.org (more
> > details at the above address).
>
> Nice one :-)
>
> I guess I must have a built-in Ruby interpreter in my brain. I didn't
> even need to read the code, let alone write any, to get the solution
> :-)

Impressive! I myself can hardly decode base64 in my mind, let alone
zlib-decompress it or ... :)

I can see lots of "GET /rubychallenge2007/Happy2007 HTTP/1.1" and similar in
the logs, but AFAICT only 9 people have cracked the code out of 206 so far.
10 including you ;)

--
Mauricio Fernandez - http://eige... - singular Ruby

_why

1/8/2007 6:21:00 AM

0

On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 11:00:21PM +0900, vasudevram wrote:
> I guess I must have a built-in Ruby interpreter in my brain. I didn't
> even need to read the code, let alone write any, to get the solution
> :-)

Zed Shaw did it blindfolded, hands tied, with a cigar in his mouth. He didn't
even have to say anything. A bit of that white-and-green tractor-fed paper
spilled out of a crease in his forehead.

_why

Evan Weaver

1/8/2007 9:11:00 AM

0


Pfff. I fail to see Zed on the list.

Evan Weaver

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Topaz

12/31/2011 10:07:00 AM

0


http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.ph...
Jewish Terrorism in France

In its issue of June 1991, the French monthly Le Choc du mois ("The
Shock of the Month") published a rather lengthy report entitled
"Jewish Militants: Fifteen Years of Terrorism" ("Milices juives.
Quinze ans de terrorisme," pp. 7-13). Under the main headline, a
subtitle summed up:

'"Jewish Action Group," "Jewish Combat Organization," "Jewish Defense
Organization"... Under these various names, Jewish activists for 15
years have unceasingly sown terror [in France] with total impunity..

The report reviews 50 cases of physical aggression committed by
organized Jewish groups during the period from June 19, 1976, to April
20, 1991. Not mentioned, therefore, are physical attacks committed by
individual Jews (which are, in any case, rare).

The victims of the 50 cases listed by Le Choc du mois, who number in
the hundreds, suffered: loss of life, an eye put out, acid throwing,
numerous hospitalizations, injuries followed by deep coma, lifetime
disabilities, and serious post-traumatic conditions, "the commission
of barbaric acts," severe beatings in the presence of policemen who
refused to intervene, and numerous ambush attacks (in one case with
the complicity of the daily newspaper Lib'ration).

Most of these acts of aggression were passed over in silence by the
media or only briefly reported. Some were applauded by Jewish
publications or organizations which, in general, after a few pro forma
words of censure, suggested that the victims deserved their fate, that
such attacks are "only natural and normal," and that no one need
expect any leniency in future if he should ever again arouse Jewish
"anger."

It is worthy of note that not one Jew has been the victim of a single
attack in revenge by any "revisionist" or so-called "extreme right"
group. (Although the press routinely lumps "revisionism" and the
"extreme right" together, in reality historical revisionism receives
support from thinking persons of all possible political views, from
the ultra-left to the extreme right, and of all parties, except the
Communists. Paul Rassinier, regarded as the founder of Holocaust
revisionism in France, was a Socialist.)..

Francois Duprat
Francois Duprat, a member of the leadership of the National Front
party, and an author and distributor of revisionist writings, was
killed in his car on March 18, 1978, when it was blown up with a
sophisticated bomb. His wife was severely injured. A "Remembrance
Commando" claimed responsibility for the crime. In keeping with the
practice of "Nazi hunters" Serge and Beate Klarsfeld, Patrice Chairoff
had published in Dossier n'onazisme ("The Neo-Nazi File," 1977), the
name and address of Duprat, and of several other persons who were
suspected of fascism, neo-Nazism, or revisionism (Le Monde, March 23,
1978, p. 7; April 26, 1978, p. 9)..

On December 9, 1979, about a hundred individuals wearing helmets
attacked the 14th national conference of GRECE (Groupe d"tudes et de
recherches sur la civilisation europ'enne, "Group for the Study and
Research of European Civilization"). Wrecking the book stands, they
displayed banners bearing the name "Organisation juive de d'fense"
(OJD, "Jewish Defense Organization"). Fifteen or so of the conference
attendees were injured. One of them lost an eye. Several of the
assailants were arrested by the police, and then released that same
afternoon on the intervention of Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch, the son of
Jean Pierre-Bloch and a friend of Jacques Chirac [currently President
of France]. Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch had been involved, and would also
later be involved, in other attacks and intercessions on behalf of
these same attackers.

On September 19, 1980, a commando group of the "Jewish Defense
Organization" (OJD) attacked sympathizers of Marc Fredriksen, an
executive of FANE ("F'd'ration d'action nationale et europ'enne," or
"National and European Action Federation"), at the Paris Palace of
Justice (court house). Six persons were injured, two of them
seriously. The Palace of Justice guards, although charged with
maintaining order, permitted the Jewish militants in this case, as in
all other similar circumstances, to act without or almost without
hindrance..

If a French "right wing" group had harmed a Jew, the media of the
world would have played up the attack, with shocking photographs of
the victim, gruesome details about the injury, follow-up interviews,
and outraged commentary..

A few days later, on October 7, Charles Bousquet, 84 years old, was
attacked in his home in Neuilly with sulfuric acid by a group of
unknown men who had apparently mistaken him for the militant
nationalist, Pierre Bousquet (no relation to Ren' Bousquet). He was
hospitalized for a month at Foch Hospital in the major burns ward, and
suffered after-effects from his injuries. He refused to press charges
because his son Pierre, a professor of history at the University of
Paris IV, has asked him not to "on account of the Israelites." He
said: "They'll be in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv, the ones who did it. It
would all be useless. I want to forget it" (during a conversation with
R. Faurisson, May 2, 1984).

On October 12, 1980, Mark Fredriksen was beaten up and admitted to the
Rambouillet hospital in serious condition. His apartment was torn
apart in his absence. While under treatment at Berck-sur-Mer for
multiple fractures, he came close to suffering another attack: three
young men showed up and asked to see him; their description matched
that of the Aziza team that subsequently attacked Michel Caignat with
acid (see below).

On October 20, 1980, the writer Andr' Figu'ras was attacked at his
residence.

On the morning of January 29, 1981, Michel (Miguel) Caignet, a
26-year-old Sorbonne student who was preparing for a doctorate in
Anglo-German linguistics, had just left his residence in Courbevoie to
go to the university when he was accosted by four individuals. They
knocked him down and prevented him from moving. One of the four
attackers sprayed his face and his right hand with sulfuric acid.
Caignet had belonged to FANE, and he was a revisionist. He had been
denounced by the weekly VSD (Vendredi/Samedi/ Dimanche). Following the
attack with acid, his face looked so hideous that only two newspapers
ventured to publish his photograph. The principal perpetrator of the
attack, Yves Aziza, a medical student and the son of Charles Aziza (an
assistant pharmacist at Montreuil), was identified by the police
within an hour of the crime. But in this case, as in others, the
French police and courts scandalously permitted Yves Aziza to flee to
Germany and to Israel. At the Justice Ministry, an official named Main
at the criminal affairs bureau (headed by Raoul B'teille)
sarcastically evaded every question put to him with regard to the
14-day delay in opening a judicial inquiry. Among Yves Aziza's
correspondents was Daniel Ziskind, the son of Michele Ziskind, sister
of Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch, who is himself the son of Jean
Pierre-Bloch.

On September 18, 1981, 200 members of the Organisation juive de combat
(OJC) or "Jewish Combat Organization" laid down the law at the Palace
of Justice in Paris, where the defamation trial brought by Pierre
Sidos, president of l'Oeuvre francaise, against Jean-Pierre Bloch was
taking place. As usual, Jewish thugs beat up several of the
spectators.

On November 25, 1981, the premises of the tudes et documentation
bookstore were set on fire by a commando group.

On May 8, 1988, at Saint-Augustin Square in Paris, OJC commandos used
iron bars to attack l'Oeuvre francaise supporters who were taking part
in the traditional parade in honor of Joan of Arc. Some 15 supporters
were injured, two of them very seriously. Four of the victims were
hospitalized. A septuagenarian remained in a coma for several weeks.
Ten OJC members were questioned by the police. That same afternoon
Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch interceded with the criminal police
investigation unit (police judiciaire) on their behalf. Legal
proceedings were instituted against some of the attackers. Some
attackers were released with the following notation by the examining
magistrate: "preliminary examination inopportune." Other attackers
were tried, though not without pressure "from the highest political
level" being brought to bear on the public prosecutor's office. In
total, only three of the attackers were tried. Each received a
two-year suspended (!) prison sentence.

On February 6, 1990, millions of viewers witnessed the brutal attack
against Olivier Mathieu during a television broadcast emceed by
Christophe Dechavanne. Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch came on to the stage
with a group of OJC militants. Mathieu had just time enough to
exclaim: "Faurisson is right." Then ten or so of the thugs severely
beat him, his fiancee, and Marc Botrel. Among those present was an
important figure among Jewish militants: Moshe Cohen, a former second
lieutenant of the Israeli army and an officer at the time of the Tagar
organization, the student branch of the Betar (59 boulevard de
Strasbourg, Paris Xe). The attacks continued off stage and out into
the street. One attacker was questioned by the police, but released a
few hours later on the intercession of Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch.
Pierre Guillaume, a leftist, is in charge of the Vieille Taupe ("Old
Mole") publishers, which has issued a number of revisionist works,
including those of Professor Faurisson. He has been the victim of a
number of serious attacks, both against his person-at the Sorbonne, in
his Paris bookstore, and at the Palace of Justice in Paris (where the
guards did not intervene) -- as well as against his property (book
warehouse, video equipment, bookstore). In 1991, groups of
demonstrators, most of them Jews, laid siege to his bookstore in the
rue d'Ulm on a regular basis. As a result of various acts of violence
(breaking shop windows, spraying chemical products, physical
intimidation, etc.), they finally succeeded in closing it.

On April 20, 1991, at the "Maison des Mines" building in Paris, about
50 individuals claiming to be members of the Groupe d'action juive
(GAJ), or "Jewish Action Group," and armed with iron bars and baseball
bats, attacked the attendees of a meeting of the "Friends of
Saint-Loup" ("Les Amis de Saint-Loup"), named after a deceased writer
whose real name was Marc Augier. Thirteen persons, most of them
elderly, were injured, two of them very seriously. Juliette Cavali',
67 years of age, was taken to Beaujon Hospital where she lapsed into a
coma that lasted three months. After regaining consciousness, she was
condemned to spend the rest of her days unable to walk or even to feed
herself. Alain L'authier, a journalist for Lib'ration and a relative
of the socialist deputy and Jewish zealot Julien Dray, witnessed the
attack from beginning to end, and provided a smug and ironical report
of it ("Zionist commando unit invites itself to the neo-Nazi meeting,"
Liberation, April 22, 1991, p. 28).

Europe's most prominent Holocaust revisionist scholar, Professor
Robert Faurisson, was the victim of ten physical assaults between
November 20, 1978, and May 31, 1993 (two in Lyon, two in Vichy, two in
Stockholm and four in Paris). Seven of these attacks were at the hands
of French Jewish organizations or militants-two in Lyon, one in Vichy,
one in Stockholm (by Swedish Jews together with French Jews who had
come from Paris by plane), one at the Sorbonne, and one at the Palace
of Justice in Paris.

The first of these seven attacks took place on November 20, 1978. It
was lauded in Lib'ration-Lyon by the Jewish journalist Bernard
Schalscha, who reported the day, the place, and the hour of the
professor's courses. Members of the Jewish Students Union who had come
by first-class train from Paris attacked the professor at the
University, while Dr. Marc Aron, a cardiologist and president of the
liaison committee of the Jewish institutions and organizations of
Lyon, was present.

The second attack occurred a few weeks later when Faurisson attempted
to resume his courses. On that day as well, Marc Aron was again at the
university.

At the Sorbonne, on September 12, 1987, members of a Jewish group of
militants attacked Henry Chauveau, Michel Sergent, Pierre Guillaume,
Freddy Storer (a Belgian), and Professor Faurisson, all of whom were
injured. (Chauveau was seriously injured.) The Sorbonne guards
apprehended one of the attackers. A plainclothes policeman ordered the
attacker released and used the violence as an excuse to expel the
professor from the university. (Prof. Faurisson had once taught at the
Sorbonne.)

On September 16, 1989, three men set a trap for Faurisson in a park
near his residence in Vichy as he was out walking his poodle. After
spraying a stinging gas into his face, temporarily blinding him, the
assailants punched him to the ground and then repeatedly kicked him in
the face and chest. If a passerby had not intervened, the attackers'
kicks to the head would have been finished off the 60-year-old
scholar. Badly injured, Faurisson had to undergo a lengthy surgical
operation. The crime investigation unit inquiry confirmed that the
attack could be attributed to "young Jewish activists from Paris."
On the eve of the attack, Faurisson had noted with surprise the
presence near the park of a certain Nicolas Ullmann (born in 1963). On
July 12, 1987, Ullmann had violently struck the professor at the Vichy
Sporting-Club. When he was questioned at the criminal investigation
department about his presence in that area, he denied having been
there. Moreover, Ullmann claimed that on the very day of the attack he
had taken part in a masked ball ("bal masqu'") in Paris, so that it
would be impossible for anyone other than his host and friend to vouch
for his presence in Paris that day. It should be noted that the
examining magistrate of Cusset, near Vichy, never summoned Faurisson
to hear his testimony. Instead, judge Jocelyne Rubantel merely
received him in her office in Cusset to inform him that she would ask
for a dismissal of the charges-which she obtained. No search was made
of the Paris headquarters of Betar/Tagar. Such a search would have
incited too much "anger" in the Jewish community.

On October 16, 1989, precisely one month after the attack in Vichy, a
bomb exploded at the door of the offices in Paris of Choc du mois,
which were then ransacked. Credit for the attack was claimed by the
"Jewish Combat Organization" (OJC) and some far left groups. Eric
Letty, who had devoted an article in Choc du mois to Professor
Faurisson, would have been killed had he not, by a miracle, detected
the imminence of the explosion.

We do not have space here to cite the other attacks against Professor
Faurisson.

Many other cases could be cited of attacks by Jewish groups: in
addition to the incidents during the years 1976-1991 listed in the
Choc du mois article, there are other, unlisted, cases, as well as
attacks that have occurred since 1992. To repeat: the total number of
victims of Jewish terror amounts to several hundreds, even though, in
contrast, not a single Jew has been the victim of a concerted or
organized attack in France.

On January 14, 1988, in Lyon, Professor Jean-Claude Allard was
hospitalized following a group attack against him for which the OJC
claimed responsibility. The attackers ambushed him in the parking lot
of the University of Lyon III. In June 1985, he had presided over the
examining board of the thesis of revisionist scholar Henri Roques on
"The 'Confessions' of Kurt Gerstein," which have been widely regarded
as key evidence for Holocaust gassings. (In an action without
precedent in French academic history, the thesis' defense was annulled
under pressure by "angry" Jews. [The English-language edition of The
'Confessions' of Kurt Gerstein is published by the IHR.])
Armed Jewish militants carried out new acts of violence on April 13,
1994, during a break in the trial of the "hooligans of the Parc des
Princes," a Paris soccer stadium. (At least one of the hooligans was a
Jew.) In this case the victims were policemen. The militants entered
the Palace of Justice with weapons and iron bars, and one of the court
house guards was attacked. "An interesting detail," one Paris paper
noted. "No investigation was made to clear up the affair, and the only
arrest made was that of one of the 'nationalist militants' who had
been attacked and ventured to defend himself." ("Jewish militants make
the law," Le Libre Journal, April 27, 1994, p. 9. See also: "The Betar
makes the law in the Palace of Justice," Rivarol, April 22, 1994, p.
5).

On April 28, 1994, the German citizen Ludwig Watzal, an official guest
of the University of Nanterre (near Paris), was struck by members of
Jewish or leftist organizations.

Many bookstores have been wrecked. In addition to the
Bleu-Blanc-Rouge, Ogmios, Librairie Francaise, and Librairie de la
Vieille Taupe stores, we may mention the Librairie de la Joyeuse
Garde. (In the last-named case, shop windows were broken, steel safety
shutters were glued shut, and excrement was strewn around.) Further
targets of attacks, for which Jewish organizations claimed
responsibility, have been offices, buildings, exhibitions, a book
warehouse and a church (Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet in Paris, on
December 21, 1978).

For those who have been targeted for attack by the Jewish militants,
the most dangerous city in France is Paris. Within Paris, one of the
most dangerous districts is the first district, and within that
district the most dangerous place is the Palace of Justice-the central
courthouse-and the surrounding area. Paradoxically, this area is under
particularly good police surveillance because the Palace has its own
"military command" consisting of hundreds of armed guards, and because
next to the Palace building is the "Quai des Orfvres," headquarters of
the police crime investigations department. As it happens, though, in
recent years the guards and police have permitted many acts of
violence to be carried out, especially against revisionists who have
been summoned to court or who come to attend the trials.

When a group of Jewish militants decide to burst into the court
building, the scenario is invariably as follows: the thugs, whose
demeanor betrays their bellicose intentions, are in no way restrained
by the guards from their intended victims. No officer attempts to
inform these shock troopers that violence will not be tolerated. The
assailants are permitted to insult, to provoke, and then to strike
their victims. Sometimes guards will make an effort to protect
victims. If a militant calls special attention to himself by extreme
violence, three guards quickly take him away, but then let him go.
Once the militants have completed their brutal work and have
disappeared, the guards hasten to the bloody or swollen victims,
fussing over them like concerned nannies. The victims are never able
to get the police to interrogate the attackers, or even to learn their
identities.

In 1986, when Laurent Fabius was Prime Minister of France, his wife,
Mme. Francoise Castro, revealed that the Jewish militants and the
Interior Minister were working hand in hand. She stated: "An
extraordinary novelty in political behavior: the Left has allowed
Jewish militants to establish themselves in some quarters of Paris and
also in Toulouse, Marseille, and Strasbourg [and to have] regular
contacts with the Interior Minister." (Le Monde, March 7, 1986, p. 8).
Castro and Fabius are both Jewish.

By a sort of consensus it seems to be generally agreed that the Jews
must be treated in France as a privileged minority whose "anger"
(colre) must be excused. (This word crops up in the press with nagging
persistence.) By law, private militia groups are not legal in France.
But the authorities allow one exception to this law. Jewish militants
are the only ones permitted to bear arms in France. (See the
photograph of a Jew armed with an automatic pistol on the roof of a
building in the rue de Nazareth. Lib'ration, Oct. 14, 1986, p. 56.)
France's criminal police investigators are thus paralyzed in their
investigations of crimes committed by these militants, who are
euphemistically called "young Jewish activists of Paris." These
militant groups enjoy at least a partial guarantee of impunity in
France. The worst thing their members have to fear is having to go
into exile in Germany or Israel for a spell..

A list of incendiary statements by French Jews in positions of
responsibility calling for physical violence would be a long one. Jews
do not shrink from political assassination. On this subject, one may
read the recent work of Nachman Ben-Yehuda, Political Assassination by
Jews: A Rhetorical Device for Justice (New York: State Univ. of New
York Press, 1993). We know the considerable role played by Jews in the
Bolshevik revolution. [See: M. Weber, "The Jewish Role in the
Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's Early Soviet Regime," Jan.-Feb. 1994
Journal.] In France, the song of the partisans was written by two
Jews, Joseph Kessel (1898-1979) and Maurice Druon, both of whom were
later members of the French Academy. The song's refrain is well known:
"Hey there! Killers by gun or blade. Kill swiftly!" ("Oh'! Les tueurs
... la balle et au couteau. Tuez vite!")..

During a 1986 interview with the Chicago Tribune (June 29, 1986),
Beate Klarsfeld told "how she haunted at least three former Nazis
until they committed suicide or died; how she organized attempts to
kidnap others; how she used headline-making gimmicks to bring to trial
or to ruin the careers of many who were convinced the world had
forgotten them." She related how she slapped the face of German
Chancellor Kurt-Georg Kiesinger in public in 1968. "Once, she and
several friends tried to kidnap Kurt Lischka" but the operation failed
because the car they were using had only two doors. As for Ernst
Ehlers, "harassed by Klarsfeld-organized demonstrations outside his
home, he first resigned his position [as judge] and then committed
suicide."

After picking up the trail of Walter Rauff in Chile, the Klarsfelds
organized demonstrations in front of his house and broke his windows.
"He died a couple of months later," Beate Klarsfeld told the American
daily. "I was glad, because as long as these people are alive, they
are an offense to their victims." "My husband and I are not fanatics
.... Once my husband held a pistol to the temple of Rauff, just to show
that we could kill him, but he didn't pull the trigger."

In 1988, Serge Klarsfeld stated: "No one has really gone after Le Pen
in dead earnest. We ought to have provoked confrontations with him so
that ... he'd take the most extreme position possible." (Le Soir
[Brussels], quoted in Rivarol, July 1, 1988, p. 5).

In 1991, Beate Klarsfeld entered Syria with fraudulent papers to go
after Alois Brunner (who was already disfigured and missing most of
his fingers as the result of letter bombs). In front of his presumed
residence, she wanted to repeat the kind of demonstration that had
been staged in front of the home of Paul Touvier in 1972 (which was
broken into, looted, and laid waste). [See: "Alois Brunner Talks About
His Past," in the Spring 1990 Journal, pp. 123ff.]

In 1992, the Klarsfelds organized what Le Monde (Oct. 21, 1992, p. 4)
called "the savage escapade of the Betar at Rostock ... spreading
terror in the central square of the Rostock town hall, with French and
Israeli flags displayed, calling passersby 'dirty Germans, dirty
Nazis!'." A short time later Beate Klarsfeld expressed approval of the
Betar attack against the Goethe Institute (German cultural center) in
Paris, calling it an act of "legitimate violence" because the Rostock
police had briefly held and questioned a few of the Jewish attackers.
(Der Standard [Vienna], Oct. 23, 1992). Nine of the policemen had been
injured, among them several who required hospitalization after being
beaten with baseball bats and iron bars, and sprayed with "defensive"
gas.

On June 8, 1993, Ren' Bousquet, former secretary general of the police
in the wartime Vichy government (and who was later deported by the
Germans), was struck down in his Paris residence by a fanatic. The
attacker, who spewed out verbiage la Klarsfeld, explained his action
as that of a lover of justice who had already tried to kill Paul
Touvier. Writing in the French daily Le Monde (June 10, 1993, p. 28),
Annick Cojean referred to Serge Klarsfeld: "Was he not the slayer of
Bousquet? The one who had tracked him down, pursued him, attacked him,
forced him to resign from his every position from 1978 to 1989? And
was he not [by this killing] robbed of a long awaited trial? The
lawyer [Klarsfeld] quietly smiles: 'Why deny it? What I feel today is
relief above all. And if that runs counter to the interests of the
trial, so be it! I can't be worrying about what those people want.
That's too much for me'."

Full article
http://ww...jhr/v16/v16n2p-2_Faur...

2006 NationalVanguard.org.

http://ww... http://www....

http://national-socialist-worldview.bl...

Topaz

1/1/2012 10:47:00 AM

0


By Luke O'Farrell

"We propose that it be made an offence to download material from the
internet that could incite racial or religious hatred." When it was
claimed that the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) made that sinister,
totalitarian proposal in September 2006, you could understand what
George W. Bush meant when he said: "They hate us for our freedoms."
Staunch in defense of freedom, Britain's conservative commentariat
rushed to condemn the MCB. "Free speech is the bedrock of a free
society!" they thundered. "Any group that seeks to undermine it has no
place in a democracy. If Muslims don't like Britain's proud,
centuries-old tradition of free speech, they know what they can do:
get out!"

Shamefully, however, many defenders of Western freedom against
Islamist tyranny seem to have forgotten what the MCB said in 2006. If
you're one of them, here's an extract from The Times to refresh your
memory:

The All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism was set up last
year. None of the 14 members of the panel is Jewish, but evidence was
taken from across the Jewish community. The report proposes that it be
made an offence to download material from the internet that could
incite racial or religious hatred. Drawing on the view of the
Macpherson report that a racist act is defined by its victim, not by
whether a perpetrator considers himself racist, anti-Semitism is
defined in the report as "any remark, insult or act, the purpose or
effect of which is to violate a Jewish person's dignity or create an
intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment
for him". (Loc. cit., 7th September 2006)

Oh dear, so it wasn't the MCB who wanted to turn us into a
police-state after all: it was the philosemitic politicians who
conducted the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism.
Whoever would have guessed it? Anyone who knows about Jews and free
speech, that's who. If Jews have power and influence, they start
working to take away free speech. It's no use arguing that some Jews
support free speech and some white goyim oppose it: the average effect
of the two groups is perfectly clear. It was whites who created free
speech in the West and it is Jews who are taking it away. Was there
any popular support for Britain's race laws, introduced in the 1960s
and steadily harshened ever since? No, there wasn't, but what does the
will of the people matter in a democracy? The Board of Jewish Deputies
wanted the race laws and got them. The Jewish Anti-Defamation League
would like identical laws in the United States; so far, thanks to the
evil white males who created the First Amendment, it hasn't gotten
them. Canadians haven't been so lucky, as the neo-con Mark Steyn has
discovered. He's gotten into trouble for saying things Muslims don't
like, but let's give him his due: he's admitted that Jews aren't
entirely blameless:

Submission from the Board of Deputies of British Jews
The Board of Deputies of British Jews welcomes the opportunity to make
this submission to the Select Committee on Religious Offences. The
Board is the representative body and voice of the British Jewish
community. It was founded in 1760. The Jewish community is covered by
the provisions of the Race Relations Acts. The Board is generally
satisfied with the format of the current legislation following the
amendments to Part 3 of the Public Order Act in the Criminal Justice
and Public Order Act 1994, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the
Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. The Malicious Communications Act
1998 and its subsequent amendment offer further protection. Together
these have removed the legal and linguistic barriers which previously
had hampered prosecutions.

The UK is now faced with a growth in inter-religious friction, sparked
in large measure by conflict in the Middle East and the Indian
subcontinent. This has led to the dissemination of propaganda
deliberately attacking Jews qua Jews by Muslims. The Sikh and Hindu
communities have similarly been targeted. We are in touch with
representative bodies within these communities and can provide
examples of such incitement. The Board of Deputies welcomes the
proposal to introduce new laws to combat incitement to religious
hatred, but notes that this must be matched by the political will to
prosecute offenders. Otherwise any new powers risk becoming as
ineffective as the existing laws against incitement to racial hatred.
"It's not enough, already! Ve vont more laws! No free speech for ze
vicked goyim!" And Mark Steyn isn't tackling another vital question:
that of how Muslims got into the West in such large numbers to join
the Jew-initiated, Jew-continued assault on free speech. Was there any
popular support for mass immigration by Muslims in Britain, for
example? No, there wasn't: there was massive popular opposition. But
what does the will of the people matter in a democracy? Britain is run
for the benefit of those who fund its political parties: men like
"Lord" Levy, his pals from Jewish Care, and David Abrahams, whose
excuse for conspiring to make secret payments to New Labour was that
he wanted to avoid the appearance of "a Jewish conspiracy". That's
what democracy means in Britain: Jews pay, pols obey. Want thought
crime laws? You got 'em! Want mass immigration? You got it! Want war
in Iraq? You got that too!

Stone is president of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality
Stone wants to keep "racism" high on the agenda because he wants to
keep bashing whites. How racist is Britain? Very racist - against
whites. When you trace the sources of the "Hammer Honky!" religion,
you find that Jews are there every time, controlling, "advising",
passing laws to suppress white dissent. Free speech is indeed the
bedrock of a free society, which is why free societies and Jews don't
mix. Those are the joys of Judeocracy and they'll keep on coming until
we take our societies back.

Full article at
http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/...

http://ww... http://www....

http://national-socialist-worldview.bl...

Topaz

1/2/2012 11:01:00 AM

0


By Luke O'Farrell

"We propose that it be made an offence to download material from the
internet that could incite racial or religious hatred." When it was
claimed that the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) made that sinister,
totalitarian proposal in September 2006, you could understand what
George W. Bush meant when he said: "They hate us for our freedoms."
Staunch in defense of freedom, Britain's conservative commentariat
rushed to condemn the MCB. "Free speech is the bedrock of a free
society!" they thundered. "Any group that seeks to undermine it has no
place in a democracy. If Muslims don't like Britain's proud,
centuries-old tradition of free speech, they know what they can do:
get out!"

Shamefully, however, many defenders of Western freedom against
Islamist tyranny seem to have forgotten what the MCB said in 2006. If
you're one of them, here's an extract from The Times to refresh your
memory:

The All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism was set up last
year. None of the 14 members of the panel is Jewish, but evidence was
taken from across the Jewish community. The report proposes that it be
made an offence to download material from the internet that could
incite racial or religious hatred. Drawing on the view of the
Macpherson report that a racist act is defined by its victim, not by
whether a perpetrator considers himself racist, anti-Semitism is
defined in the report as "any remark, insult or act, the purpose or
effect of which is to violate a Jewish person's dignity or create an
intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment
for him". (Loc. cit., 7th September 2006)

Oh dear, so it wasn't the MCB who wanted to turn us into a
police-state after all: it was the philosemitic politicians who
conducted the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Anti-Semitism.
Whoever would have guessed it? Anyone who knows about Jews and free
speech, that's who. If Jews have power and influence, they start
working to take away free speech. It's no use arguing that some Jews
support free speech and some white goyim oppose it: the average effect
of the two groups is perfectly clear. It was whites who created free
speech in the West and it is Jews who are taking it away. Was there
any popular support for Britain's race laws, introduced in the 1960s
and steadily harshened ever since? No, there wasn't, but what does the
will of the people matter in a democracy? The Board of Jewish Deputies
wanted the race laws and got them. The Jewish Anti-Defamation League
would like identical laws in the United States; so far, thanks to the
evil white males who created the First Amendment, it hasn't gotten
them. Canadians haven't been so lucky, as the neo-con Mark Steyn has
discovered. He's gotten into trouble for saying things Muslims don't
like, but let's give him his due: he's admitted that Jews aren't
entirely blameless:

Submission from the Board of Deputies of British Jews
The Board of Deputies of British Jews welcomes the opportunity to make
this submission to the Select Committee on Religious Offences. The
Board is the representative body and voice of the British Jewish
community. It was founded in 1760. The Jewish community is covered by
the provisions of the Race Relations Acts. The Board is generally
satisfied with the format of the current legislation following the
amendments to Part 3 of the Public Order Act in the Criminal Justice
and Public Order Act 1994, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the
Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. The Malicious Communications Act
1998 and its subsequent amendment offer further protection. Together
these have removed the legal and linguistic barriers which previously
had hampered prosecutions.

The UK is now faced with a growth in inter-religious friction, sparked
in large measure by conflict in the Middle East and the Indian
subcontinent. This has led to the dissemination of propaganda
deliberately attacking Jews qua Jews by Muslims. The Sikh and Hindu
communities have similarly been targeted. We are in touch with
representative bodies within these communities and can provide
examples of such incitement. The Board of Deputies welcomes the
proposal to introduce new laws to combat incitement to religious
hatred, but notes that this must be matched by the political will to
prosecute offenders. Otherwise any new powers risk becoming as
ineffective as the existing laws against incitement to racial hatred.
"It's not enough, already! Ve vont more laws! No free speech for ze
vicked goyim!" And Mark Steyn isn't tackling another vital question:
that of how Muslims got into the West in such large numbers to join
the Jew-initiated, Jew-continued assault on free speech. Was there any
popular support for mass immigration by Muslims in Britain, for
example? No, there wasn't: there was massive popular opposition. But
what does the will of the people matter in a democracy? Britain is run
for the benefit of those who fund its political parties: men like
"Lord" Levy, his pals from Jewish Care, and David Abrahams, whose
excuse for conspiring to make secret payments to New Labour was that
he wanted to avoid the appearance of "a Jewish conspiracy". That's
what democracy means in Britain: Jews pay, pols obey. Want thought
crime laws? You got 'em! Want mass immigration? You got it! Want war
in Iraq? You got that too!

Stone is president of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality
Stone wants to keep "racism" high on the agenda because he wants to
keep bashing whites. How racist is Britain? Very racist - against
whites. When you trace the sources of the "Hammer Honky!" religion,
you find that Jews are there every time, controlling, "advising",
passing laws to suppress white dissent. Free speech is indeed the
bedrock of a free society, which is why free societies and Jews don't
mix. Those are the joys of Judeocracy and they'll keep on coming until
we take our societies back.

Full article at
http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/...

http://ww... http://www....

http://national-socialist-worldview.bl...