raven1
5/15/2013 2:41:00 PM
On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:34:33 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <dead@gone.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 May 2013 07:40:43 -0500, Don Kresch wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 00:33:56 -0400, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> scrawled in blood:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"Olrik" <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:kmv1i7$5u2$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> Le 2013-05-14 23:52, Scout a ?crit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Olrik" <olrik666@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:kmv007$sao$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> Le 2013-05-14 19:10, RD Sandman a ?crit :
>>>>>>> raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:mr05p8phuvut4qeb5at89jnuto26q6r8dl@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2013 13:01:29 -0500, D?nk 42? <dank@420.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2013 08:00:20 -0700, Kurt Nicklas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On May 14, 9:48 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2013 04:03:16 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The House Ways and Means Committee has scheduled a formal
>>>>>>>>>>>> hearing Friday to probe the Internal Revenue Service for
>>>>>>>>>>>> placing heavier scrutiny on conservative groups that applied
>>>>>>>>>>>> for nonprofit status between 2010 and 2012.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly surprising, considering that the overwhelming majority
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>>>> groups are fronts for the Koch brothers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What does that have to do with anything, Richard?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wonder where MoveOn gets its money?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From member donations. They tend to ask for them on a daily basis
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> one cause or another.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just like the NRA.....imagine that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone here questioning where the NRA gets its money?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. A couple of times a year someone tries to claim the NRA is owned
>>>>> by the firearms industry.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe not in a strict financial definition of "owned", but it is in so
>>>> many other ways, mostly ideological.
>>>
>>>And you don't think that's the same ideology of it's membership?
>>>
>>>Do you think that the rights of the members to keep and bear arms would
>>>be negatively impacted if you allowed gun markers to go under due to red
>>>tape, frivolous law suits, oppressive laws and the rest?
>>>
>>>So I'm not seeing how the ideology is going to be any different than
>>>that of the membership.
>>>
>> Oh but you have to understand: it's ok when MoveOn and all
>> *those* groups are like that; it's not when it's the NRA and *those*
>> groups. See? It's all about blatant hypocrisy.
>
>Tell us of the murderous special interest group that has captured MoveOn
>and turned it into a sick, anti-social
"Anti-social" isn't an insult as far as Kresch is concerned.
>parody of what it stood for, as
>has happened with the NRA.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Don aa#51, Knight of BAAWA, Jedi Slackmaster Praise "Bob" or burn in
>> Slacklessness trying not to.