cloud dreamer
2/3/2012 7:59:00 PM
On 03/02/2012 4:53 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> cloud dreamer<Save@0urResurces.now> wrote:
>> On 03/02/2012 12:13 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>> cloud dreamer wrote:
>>>> On 03/02/2012 1:16 AM, suzeeq wrote:
>>>>> cloud dreamer wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/02/2012 11:57 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>>>>>> cloud dreamer wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 02/02/2012 11:07 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>>>>>>>> John Q. Brazzleton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 02/02/2012 1:53 PM, Michael Black wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, suzeeq wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, everything was a repeat last night!! I don't watch all the
>>>>>>>>>>>> shows
>>>>>>>>>>>> all the time normally, but the ones I would have watched showed
>>>>>>>>>>>> episodes I'd seen before. Except maybe CSI - I thought I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>> seen it,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but maybe not, didn't watch the whole thing.
>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, last night's CSI was a repeat
>
>>>>>>>>>> Blatantly incorrect behavior on the network's part, if so. It's
>>>>>>>>>> supposed to be all new episodes in the months of November,
>>>>>>>>>> February, and May.
>
>>>>>>>>> Sweeps don't start till tonight I think. Not the first of the
>>>>>>>>> month in any case.
>
>>>>>>>> You're responding to Seamus.
>
>>>>>>> At this point... who the heck really cares. I get just as tired of the
>>>>>>> 'it's Seamus again' posts nd the bickering over them that ensues as
>>>>>>> his.
>
>>>>>> Keep feeding him, he returns.
>
>>>>> You're one to talk... He comes back whether anyone responds or not
>>>>> anyway.
>
>>>> I'm not responding to him. I'm responding to YOU.
>
>>>> *smacks forehead*
>
>>> Smack it some more... I was referring to your habit of being the first
>>> one to reply to his threads with 'Seamus alert'. That's the same thing.
>
>> No. It's telling people like you who don't have the presence of mind to
>> weed him out from others. It is NOT engaging him in any way shape or form.
>
>> Stop and re-read that. You obviously missed the point there.
>
>> Look at what happened to the Seamus thread before that. Went on forever
>> with people feeding the guy's delusions. Warning people obviously works.
>
>> Yet you people will whine and whine and whine either way.
>
>> <shaking head>
>
> This is now the 37th article in this thread. If YOU hadn't troll fed,
> if you hadn't posted followups in this thread at all, there would have
> been many fewer followups.
>
> You saved Usenet from a smaller thread. You are my hero, Clod.
Did you say something?
..
--
I told you so. You damned fools.
- H.G. Wells