"David Johnston" wrote in message news:jduifl$f0q$1@dont-email.me...
On 1/3/2012 2:34 AM, Hunter wrote:
> In article<jdsj3k$8t8$1@dont-email.me>, janeanddano@yahoo.com says...
>>
>> "Hunter" wrote in message
>> news:MPG.296b17ba726eede198a21c@news.optonline.net...
>>
>> In article<s3s1g7h7uia0lvfq47ktk94rsdea2qo4u6@4ax.com>,
>> masonbarge@gmail.com
>>
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken, Star Trek involved an actual military organization.
>> -----
>> No it wasn't. It was more like a diplomatic police force forced to take
>> on a
>> military component. The United States Coast Guard would be a better fit
>> than
>> the United States Navy for instance.
>>
>> =====================================
>>
>> Seriously? You maintain that the Coast Guard is NOT a military
>> organization?
>>
>> You may have reached a new level of obtuseness Hunter.
> ---
> I didn't say that the Cost Guard wasn't military Dano, I said that Star
> fleet
> would be better fit with the Coast Guard than the Navy. The Cost Guard has
> military AND law enforcement components just like Star fleet, although yes
> the
> navy is used in say drug interdiction sometimes, but it is not one of its
> usual, regular functions.
It's not one of Starfleet's usual regular functions either.
====================================
Point to David.
BTW...is the Cost Guard a consumer protection group?