JRStern
12/17/2011 2:53:00 AM
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:41:02 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
>On 12/16/2011 8:50 AM, tenworld wrote:
>> On Dec 16, 6:23 am, jack<j...@columbia.edu> wrote:
>>>> Haven't all of those questions already been answered?
>>>
>>> Seeing how the world of 2149 has been brought about by a combination
>>> of political, social, and economic factors, it would be interesting to
>>> see how merely pillaging the resources of 85M BCE will help anything
>>> in the "present."-
>>
>> It parallels the current world where so many American jobs have gone
>> to Asia that people here cant buy what they used too even at the
>> cheaper prices that resulted from "made in china/korea/thailand".
>> Short term gain is what business schools have taught for the last
>> generation.
>
>"Short term gain" implies a longer view than is currently taught by
>business schools. "Profit at any cost this quarter" is closer to the
>reality.
Agree with you guys, but not sure what it has to do with Tera Nova.
There's the theme that any change in the past may change the future in
unlimited ways, and of course the counter-theme that in Tera Nova
that's just what they will do either to destroy one side in the future
wars, or to make the future so much better there are no future wars.
IOW, Time Wars, cuz you can always go back later and cancel or reverse
the change, and then what? Enough to make your head spin, or to let
screenwriters do whatever they want.
I hope they do leave it with some modest degree of closure, as you
just know they'll only fix it in the first five minutes next season
anyway.
J.