[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Re: [QUIZ] Fuzzy Time (#99) - Results

Gavin Kistner

11/2/2006 5:28:00 PM

From: Gavin Kistner
> Following are the results I obtained from running my test
> script against everyone's submissions.

Oops. I found a small bug in my test script's counting of offsets.
(Large update intervals would cause it to think that the class was
transitioning outside of a +/- 5 minute range.)

Here are updated results and test script. Sorry for the bandwidth. :)

C:\Ruby\Quiz\FuzzyTime>testall.bat

C:\Ruby\Quiz\FuzzyTime>ruby -rtest_fuzzytime.rb BenGiddings_1.rb
Loaded suite BenGiddings_1
Started
F
Finished in 0.016 seconds.

1) Failure:
test_running(FuzzyTimeTester)
[./test_fuzzytime.rb:33:in `test_running'
./test_fuzzytime.rb:27:in `times'
./test_fuzzytime.rb:27:in `test_running'
./test_fuzzytime.rb:23:in `each'
./test_fuzzytime.rb:23:in `test_running']:
<Mon Nov 06 23:04:15 -0700 2006> expected but was
<Mon Nov 06 23:04:13 -0700 2006>.

1 tests, 3 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors

C:\Ruby\Quiz\FuzzyTime>ruby -rtest_fuzzytime.rb CameronPope_1.rb
Loaded suite CameronPope_1
Started
2 second advance: 0.0% behind, 38.1% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
0.7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.7% 0% 12% 41% 46%

6 second advance: 0.0% behind, 31.8% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
0.7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.7% 4.8% 9.6% 25% 38% 22%

17 second advance: 1.8% behind, 19.5% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 2.7% 6.2% 11% 14% 19% 21% 18% 6.2%

30 second advance: 3.2% behind, 16.1% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
1.4% 2.1% 1.4% 3.4% 6.2% 19% 14% 18% 23% 9.0% 3.4%

47 second advance: 6.8% behind, 14.2% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
5.6% 3.5% 5.6% 5.6% 11% 13% 16% 15% 16% 5.6% 3.5%

60 second advance: 11.5% behind, 9.9% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
10% 7.6% 6.3% 11% 13% 15% 15% 12% 6.3% 4.2% 0.7%

65 second advance: 9.8% behind, 10.2% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
11% 4.8% 8.3% 10% 9.0% 18% 14% 14% 6.2% 3.4% 0%

120 second advance: 22.5% behind, 9.3% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
26% 20% 0% 17% 0% 17% 0% 15% 0% 4.9% 0%

290 second advance: 27.2% behind, 9.4% ahead
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5
64% 10% 2.9% 5.0% 2.9% 6.5% 3.6% 2.2% 1.4% 1.4% 0%

2 Answers

Brian M. Scott

11/5/2011 8:27:00 PM

0

On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:43:58 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E.
Spoor)" <seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote in
<news:j943lu$sed$1@dont-email.me> in
rec.arts.sf.composition:

> On 11/5/11 3:41 PM, Dirk van den Boom wrote:
>> Am 02.11.2011 15:02, schrieb Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor):

>>> With the contract in front of me, I can now say that
>>> there will be a sequel, tentatively titled _Spheres of
>>> Influence_!

>> Excellent. I want more boobs in # 2.

> The boobs are in the hands of the art director (Ha! I
> crack me up!)

If you don't like the result, will you say that the art is
in the hands of the boobs? (Now there's an alien image for
you!)

Brian

Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)

11/5/2011 8:39:00 PM

0

On 11/5/11 4:27 PM, Brian M. Scott wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2011 15:43:58 -0400, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E.
> Spoor)"<seawasp@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote in
> <news:j943lu$sed$1@dont-email.me> in
> rec.arts.sf.composition:
>
>> On 11/5/11 3:41 PM, Dirk van den Boom wrote:
>>> Am 02.11.2011 15:02, schrieb Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor):
>
>>>> With the contract in front of me, I can now say that
>>>> there will be a sequel, tentatively titled _Spheres of
>>>> Influence_!
>
>>> Excellent. I want more boobs in # 2.
>
>> The boobs are in the hands of the art director (Ha! I
>> crack me up!)
>
> If you don't like the result, will you say that the art is
> in the hands of the boobs? (Now there's an alien image for
> you!)

The art department's gone tits-up!


--
Sea Wasp
/^ ;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentra... Blog:
http://seawasp.livej...