Barb May
12/15/2011 7:40:00 PM
Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> Barb May <barbmay@nonofyourbusinessx.tv> wrote:
>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>> Barb May <barbmay@nonofyourbusinessx.tv> wrote:
>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>> Barb May <barbmay@nonofyourbusinessx.tv> wrote:
>>>>>> Dano wrote:
>>>>>>> "Remysun" wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Dec 13, 11:27 pm, Thanatos <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not only is Islam not a race, Arab isn't even a race.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whatever --ist those people are, they're not racist, at least
>>>>>>>> in regard to how they view Muslims.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We can still call it prejudice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The word bigot works too. This is how Thanny rolls is it not?
>>>>>>> Turn a debate about hate into an exercise in semantics.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the point in even engaging with this creepy bastard? We
>>>>>>> all know exactly what he is...by any name you choose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Because it's fun to watch him do his little monkey dance
>>>>>> whenever someone yanks his chain.
>>>>>> 2. To ensure that no one ever takes him seriously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone kiss Barb's heroic, self-sacrificing ass. Truth and
>>>>> justice revolve around her. If she didn't troll feed, no one else
>>>>> could draw his own conclusion as the the poster's actual motive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Barb saves lives.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, there is no practical difference between Barb and
>>>>> clod's public service seamus alerts that create threads in which
>>>>> seamus would have otherwise been ignored.
>>>>>
>>>>> Troll feeders are always the villains, but Barb isn't clever
>>>>> enough to figure it out for herself.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, the irony!
>>>> Kermie feeds people he considers trolls by complaining about their
>>>> troll feeding. He should try taking his own advice and ignore those
>>>> he believes are "villains."
>>>
>>>> As for myself, being called a villain by a whiner like 'Kermie' is
>>>> a compliment.
>>>
>>> I never called you a troll. Get that reading comprehension problem
>>> fixed soonest.
>>
>> Clearly, you're the one with the reading comprehension problem. I
>> never said you called me a troll. I said you "consider" me a troll.
>> Don't try to deny that.
>
> I don't consider you to be a troll. You're a very sad person feigning
> a pulse and an intellect with a hero complex and a bizarre need to
> speak of herself in third person. You're worth ridiculing.
>
>> You accuse others of "troll feeding" while doing exactly the same
>> thing. You do consider Thanny, Ubi, and Rich trolls don't you? Then
>> why are you feeding them?
>
> Nope, I don't consider them to be trolls. Any more mind reading
> tricks?
>
> But let's not change the subject, as we are still talking about your
> favorite subject, you. Are you playing hero by "ensuring" that no one
> takes him seriously? Are you contributing to the spread of hate by
> quoting his article in your followup, thus your actions are contrary
> to your claims?
>
>> Take your own advice and stay on topic, or continue being a clown
>> and a hypocrite.
>
> Did you say "on topic"? There's a concept you know nothing about.
Ah. So once again you deny the truth about yourself and you make
ridiculous assertions about others. Classic!
The truth about you = hypocrite who criticizes others for doing exactly
what you're doing now.
Ridiculous assertions = "sad person" "feigning a pulse and an intellect"
"speak of herself in third person" "hero complex"
If you're stupid enough to continue denying your own abject hypocrisy
while also trying to defend those ridiculous assertions about me, you'll
only cement your reputation as a dishonest loser who will invent
anything while trying to save face. Add that to your pathetic efforts at
moderation of an unmoderated newsgroup and it makes your reputation as a
clown undeniable.
--
Barb