[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

UDP Server

Mohammad ---

10/16/2006 2:55:00 AM

Alright I've been trying to set up a UDP server for my "Game", the
"Client" is in python, but I want a ruby server. I tried some code from
the Ruby book, but I wasn't able to get it to work. If someone could
please help me out with starting the server. BTW: port is 5555

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....
14 Answers

Paul Barry

10/16/2006 12:58:00 PM

0

Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
> On 10/15/06, Mohammad --- <name.goes.here44@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Alright I've been trying to set up a UDP server for my "Game", the
>> "Client" is in python, but I want a ruby server. I tried some code from
>> the Ruby book, but I wasn't able to get it to work. If someone could
>> please help me out with starting the server. BTW: port is 5555
>>

Not sure what platform you are using, but ... if Linux, some of the
distros come with a pretty tight firewall setting by default ... your
traffic to port 5555 may be being discarded/blocked.

Just a thought.

The other thing that might help the network-savvy readers to help you is
if you post the code (or part of) you have written that's not working.

Regards.

Paul.

--
Paul Barry
paul.barry@itcarlow.ie
http://glasnost.itcarlow....
Institute of Technology, Carlow, Ireland.

Norgg

10/16/2006 1:26:00 PM

0

Mohammad --- wrote:
> Alright I've been trying to set up a UDP server for my "Game", the
> "Client" is in python, but I want a ruby server. I tried some code from
> the Ruby book, but I wasn't able to get it to work. If someone could
> please help me out with starting the server. BTW: port is 5555
>

Code for just about the simplest of servers is below, should just print
out all requests coming in from your python client if it's sending it
correctly:

require 'socket'
serv = UDPSocket.open
serv.bind(nil, 5555) #first param is hostname, nil works fine.
loop{puts serv.recv(5555)}

If it doesn't work then you should probably test to make sure your
python client is actually sending things correctly.

Mohammad ---

10/17/2006 1:49:00 AM

0

John Turner wrote:
> Mohammad --- wrote:
>> Alright I've been trying to set up a UDP server for my "Game", the
>> "Client" is in python, but I want a ruby server. I tried some code from
>> the Ruby book, but I wasn't able to get it to work. If someone could
>> please help me out with starting the server. BTW: port is 5555
>>
>
> Code for just about the simplest of servers is below, should just print
> out all requests coming in from your python client if it's sending it
> correctly:
>
> require 'socket'
> serv = UDPSocket.open
> serv.bind(nil, 5555) #first param is hostname, nil works fine.
> loop{puts serv.recv(5555)}
>
> If it doesn't work then you should probably test to make sure your
> python client is actually sending things correctly.

Thanks alot now I can get started on a server. :D also how would I get
the address also, the reasson why I decided to do the game in python
instead of ruby was beacause there is a libary called "PyGame" which is
just a another handler for open SDL(is that it? the graphics?) anyway is
there one for ruby there's still time for me to change the language

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

GOP_Decline_and_Fall

9/26/2013 2:07:00 AM

0

On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:45:51 -0400, Sancho Panza
<otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:

>On 9/24/2013 11:39 PM, RichTravsky wrote:
>> Sancho Panza wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/19/2013 12:12 AM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:42:08 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>> <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> GOP_Decline_and_Fall <Dev@null.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:69sk39to6pb3nrd53ss2k2pg360jl6c33l@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:33:18 -0400, Sancho Panza
>>>>>> <otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/18/2013 11:05 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:05:52 -0500, AlleyCat <alley@aohell.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:30:32 -0600, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The law was broken (FL State law) the minute the Zimmerloon chased
>>>>>>>>>> after Martin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No law against trying to FIND a suspect for the Police, moron.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The "rules" were broken by the Zimmerloon for: a) Following, b)
>>>>>>>>>> Carrying weapon, c) attempting to restrain.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What rules? Zimmerman was NOT "on duty" for Neighborhood Watch, that
>>>>>>>>> night. He was going to Target, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There's no law against carrying a gun, if you are licensed to do so,
>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Attempting to restrain? BWAHAHAHAHA What law? GZ was not on duty
>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> NW, and you can restrain a suspect all you want! What a loon, you
>>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Get real.
>>>>>>>> You certainly cannot restrain a minor all you want.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called kidnapping.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There was absolutely not a scintilla of evidence about any restraining
>>>>>>> of Martin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other than the witnesses and Zimmerman's own confession you mean?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When did Zimmerman state that he restrained Martin?
>>>>
>>>> In the re-enactment.
>>>>
>>>> ..and then somebody came with a flashlight and I thought it was a
>>>> police officer, so I said, ?Are you the police?? and I thou...?I still
>>>> had my gun out, and I said are you the police, my guns right here, and
>>>> he said no, no I?m not?I?m calling the police, and I said don?t call
>>>> the police, help me restrain this guy.
>>>>
>>> An out-and-out lie. Nowhere in the 25:26 minutes of Mamalo's direct
>>> testimony nor in 21:22 of cross-examination was restrain or any
>>> reference to that ever made.
>>> As a matter of fact, toward the end of the direct testimony he responded
>>> to a question that Zimmerman had never even glanced at Martin's body.
>>
>> Those are Zimmerman's own words.
>>
>Not at the trial, and that is what the judge and jury determined stands.

The re-enactment certainly WAS played for the jury in the Zimmerman
murder trial.

Perhaps you watched some other trial.

George Plimpton

9/26/2013 3:54:00 AM

0

On 9/25/2013 7:06 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:45:51 -0400, Sancho Panza
> <otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/24/2013 11:39 PM, RichTravsky wrote:
>>> Sancho Panza wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/19/2013 12:12 AM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:42:08 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>>> <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> GOP_Decline_and_Fall <Dev@null.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:69sk39to6pb3nrd53ss2k2pg360jl6c33l@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:33:18 -0400, Sancho Panza
>>>>>>> <otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2013 11:05 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:05:52 -0500, AlleyCat <alley@aohell.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:30:32 -0600, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The law was broken (FL State law) the minute the Zimmerloon chased
>>>>>>>>>>> after Martin.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No law against trying to FIND a suspect for the Police, moron.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The "rules" were broken by the Zimmerloon for: a) Following, b)
>>>>>>>>>>> Carrying weapon, c) attempting to restrain.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What rules? Zimmerman was NOT "on duty" for Neighborhood Watch, that
>>>>>>>>>> night. He was going to Target, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There's no law against carrying a gun, if you are licensed to do so,
>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Attempting to restrain? BWAHAHAHAHA What law? GZ was not on duty
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> NW, and you can restrain a suspect all you want! What a loon, you
>>>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Get real.
>>>>>>>>> You certainly cannot restrain a minor all you want.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's called kidnapping.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There was absolutely not a scintilla of evidence about any restraining
>>>>>>>> of Martin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Other than the witnesses and Zimmerman's own confession you mean?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When did Zimmerman state that he restrained Martin?
>>>>>
>>>>> In the re-enactment.
>>>>>
>>>>> ..and then somebody came with a flashlight and I thought it was a
>>>>> police officer, so I said, ?Are you the police?? and I thou...?I still
>>>>> had my gun out, and I said are you the police, my guns right here, and
>>>>> he said no, no I?m not?I?m calling the police, and I said don?t call
>>>>> the police, help me restrain this guy.
>>>>>
>>>> An out-and-out lie. Nowhere in the 25:26 minutes of Mamalo's direct
>>>> testimony nor in 21:22 of cross-examination was restrain or any
>>>> reference to that ever made.
>>>> As a matter of fact, toward the end of the direct testimony he responded
>>>> to a question that Zimmerman had never even glanced at Martin's body.
>>>
>>> Those are Zimmerman's own words.
>>>
>> Not at the trial, and that is what the judge and jury determined stands.
>
> The re-enactment certainly WAS played for the jury in the Zimmerman
> murder trial.

Allowed by the prosecution, i.e., the state attorneys who overcharged
and incompetently managed the case - *not* because they wanted Zimmerman
to "get off", but because they were just incompetent fat fucks.

GOP_Decline_and_Fall

9/26/2013 4:22:00 AM

0

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:53:57 -0700, George Plimpton <george@si.not>
wrote:

>On 9/25/2013 7:06 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:45:51 -0400, Sancho Panza
>> <otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/24/2013 11:39 PM, RichTravsky wrote:
>>>> Sancho Panza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/19/2013 12:12 AM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:42:08 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>>>> <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GOP_Decline_and_Fall <Dev@null.net> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:69sk39to6pb3nrd53ss2k2pg360jl6c33l@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:33:18 -0400, Sancho Panza
>>>>>>>> <otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2013 11:05 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:05:52 -0500, AlleyCat <alley@aohell.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:30:32 -0600, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The law was broken (FL State law) the minute the Zimmerloon chased
>>>>>>>>>>>> after Martin.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No law against trying to FIND a suspect for the Police, moron.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The "rules" were broken by the Zimmerloon for: a) Following, b)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Carrying weapon, c) attempting to restrain.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What rules? Zimmerman was NOT "on duty" for Neighborhood Watch, that
>>>>>>>>>>> night. He was going to Target, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There's no law against carrying a gun, if you are licensed to do so,
>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Attempting to restrain? BWAHAHAHAHA What law? GZ was not on duty
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> NW, and you can restrain a suspect all you want! What a loon, you
>>>>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Get real.
>>>>>>>>>> You certainly cannot restrain a minor all you want.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's called kidnapping.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There was absolutely not a scintilla of evidence about any restraining
>>>>>>>>> of Martin.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other than the witnesses and Zimmerman's own confession you mean?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When did Zimmerman state that he restrained Martin?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the re-enactment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ..and then somebody came with a flashlight and I thought it was a
>>>>>> police officer, so I said, ?Are you the police?? and I thou...?I still
>>>>>> had my gun out, and I said are you the police, my guns right here, and
>>>>>> he said no, no I?m not?I?m calling the police, and I said don?t call
>>>>>> the police, help me restrain this guy.
>>>>>>
>>>>> An out-and-out lie. Nowhere in the 25:26 minutes of Mamalo's direct
>>>>> testimony nor in 21:22 of cross-examination was restrain or any
>>>>> reference to that ever made.
>>>>> As a matter of fact, toward the end of the direct testimony he responded
>>>>> to a question that Zimmerman had never even glanced at Martin's body.
>>>>
>>>> Those are Zimmerman's own words.
>>>>
>>> Not at the trial, and that is what the judge and jury determined stands.
>>
>> The re-enactment certainly WAS played for the jury in the Zimmerman
>> murder trial.
>
>Allowed by the prosecution, i.e., the state attorneys who overcharged
>and incompetently managed the case - *not* because they wanted Zimmerman
>to "get off", but because they were just incompetent fat fucks.

At the end of the day the bottom line is a mentally disturbed murderer
roams free, a threat to his wife, her family and anyone he comes into
contact with.

George Plimpton

9/26/2013 6:03:00 AM

0

On 9/25/2013 9:22 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:53:57 -0700, George Plimpton <george@si.not>
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/25/2013 7:06 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:45:51 -0400, Sancho Panza
>>> <otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/24/2013 11:39 PM, RichTravsky wrote:
>>>>> Sancho Panza wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/19/2013 12:12 AM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 22:42:08 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>>>>> <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> GOP_Decline_and_Fall <Dev@null.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:69sk39to6pb3nrd53ss2k2pg360jl6c33l@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:33:18 -0400, Sancho Panza
>>>>>>>>> <otterpower@xhotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/2013 11:05 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:05:52 -0500, AlleyCat <alley@aohell.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:30:32 -0600, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The law was broken (FL State law) the minute the Zimmerloon chased
>>>>>>>>>>>>> after Martin.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No law against trying to FIND a suspect for the Police, moron.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The "rules" were broken by the Zimmerloon for: a) Following, b)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carrying weapon, c) attempting to restrain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What rules? Zimmerman was NOT "on duty" for Neighborhood Watch, that
>>>>>>>>>>>> night. He was going to Target, idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's no law against carrying a gun, if you are licensed to do so,
>>>>>>>>>>>> liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Attempting to restrain? BWAHAHAHAHA What law? GZ was not on duty
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> NW, and you can restrain a suspect all you want! What a loon, you
>>>>>>>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Get real.
>>>>>>>>>>> You certainly cannot restrain a minor all you want.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's called kidnapping.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There was absolutely not a scintilla of evidence about any restraining
>>>>>>>>>> of Martin.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Other than the witnesses and Zimmerman's own confession you mean?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When did Zimmerman state that he restrained Martin?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the re-enactment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ..and then somebody came with a flashlight and I thought it was a
>>>>>>> police officer, so I said, ?Are you the police?? and I thou...?I still
>>>>>>> had my gun out, and I said are you the police, my guns right here, and
>>>>>>> he said no, no I?m not?I?m calling the police, and I said don?t call
>>>>>>> the police, help me restrain this guy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> An out-and-out lie. Nowhere in the 25:26 minutes of Mamalo's direct
>>>>>> testimony nor in 21:22 of cross-examination was restrain or any
>>>>>> reference to that ever made.
>>>>>> As a matter of fact, toward the end of the direct testimony he responded
>>>>>> to a question that Zimmerman had never even glanced at Martin's body.
>>>>>
>>>>> Those are Zimmerman's own words.
>>>>>
>>>> Not at the trial, and that is what the judge and jury determined stands.
>>>
>>> The re-enactment certainly WAS played for the jury in the Zimmerman
>>> murder trial.
>>
>> Allowed by the prosecution, i.e., the state attorneys who overcharged
>> and incompetently managed the case - *not* because they wanted Zimmerman
>> to "get off", but because they were just incompetent fat fucks.
>
> At the end of the day the bottom line is

The bottom line is:

* Traycon, the thug, was the aggressor
* George Zimmerman shot Traycon - the thug aggressor - in self defense
* Zimmerman was, justly, found not guilty by the jury, which did indeed
consider all evidence and applicable law

Gronk

10/16/2013 9:36:00 PM

0

Del Amitri wrote:

>>> Opinions are like assholes, etc...
>>
>> Even you have them.....are saying something? ;)
>>
>
> Sure, mine are sound.
>

You're saying your asshole is sound?

I swear, this is an entertaining thread...

Del Amitri

10/16/2013 9:49:00 PM

0


> I swear,


You're going to swear all right, trust me on that...

RichTravsky

10/21/2013 4:54:00 AM

0

George Plimpton wrote:
>
> On 10/15/2013 9:44 PM, RichTravsky wrote:
> > RD Sandman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Bottom line is that the FBI already ruled out a civil rights case and the
> >> Florida statute kinda prevents the Martin family from pursuing this any
> >> further. IOW, I would expect there will be more noise like on Usenet
> >> than you will hear from Holder.
> >
> >
> > There is nothing to prevent a civil suit against Zimmerman.
>
> It won't happen. Guaranteed. The entire Traycon-the-thug life story
> would come out, and that would cost the thug's family money. It would
> kill the chance for the Traycon-the-savior TV movie.

None of that would be relevent to the case, whereas Zimmerman's violent
record would be.