[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Feeling a little (sc)raped? -- Google CodeSearch

Trans

10/5/2006 11:06:00 AM

How do others feel about this Google CodeSearch?

http://www.google.com/...

T.

9 Answers

Peter Hickman

10/5/2006 11:19:00 AM

0

Well it would seem that the Perl and Ruby code I wrote is indexed. I
wonder what has happened to Python stuff? The code was made public, it
is on public archives (they seem to have scraped raa and cpan), so I see
no problem with this. I wonder if they'll grab code off user sites as my
C stuff is not in any archive.

Looks like it might be useful there are times when searching for an
error message on google just leaves me with 1,000s of messages about the
error message and what I wanted was the code that generated it.

Leslie Viljoen

10/5/2006 11:37:00 AM

0

On 10/5/06, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do others feel about this Google CodeSearch?
>
> http://www.google.com/...

This is the purpose of open source - it's openly available!
Let the information FLOW FREE!

Paul Battley

10/5/2006 11:44:00 AM

0

On 05/10/06, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
> How do others feel about this Google CodeSearch?

I think it's a great idea. A specialised search engine indexing
publicly-available source code - what's not to like?

I'm not sure if I'm going to end up using it - I'll see in time - but
I'm glad it's there.

Paul.

Christian Neukirchen

10/5/2006 1:52:00 PM

0

"Paul Battley" <pbattley@gmail.com> writes:

> On 05/10/06, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How do others feel about this Google CodeSearch?
>
> I think it's a great idea. A specialised search engine indexing
> publicly-available source code - what's not to like?

But it's not like the idea is new, is it?

> Paul.
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneuk...

Martin Coxall

10/5/2006 1:58:00 PM

0

> But it's not like the idea is new, is it?
>

Does that matter?

Martin

Paul Battley

10/5/2006 2:03:00 PM

0

On 05/10/06, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> wrote:
> But it's not like the idea is new, is it?

Indeed. But nor was the search engine. Choice is good, and Google
CodeSearch has some nice features I haven't seen elsewhere, like
regular expressions and search by licence.

Paul.

Marc Heiler

10/5/2006 4:10:00 PM

0

Its a good idea.

However I am not sure about its quality.

Often when I use google, I just find 80% crap, or unrelated, even though
I do search for specific topics. While on the other hand, sometimes
blogs and similar do yield much better information (praise _why as well
by the way!)

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....

Farm1

10/11/2012 1:28:00 AM

0

"ALP FauxBook" <gmsmerkoff@carbon.tax.is.ineffective> wrote in message
news:k53l46$cju$1@dont-email.me...
> On 10/10/2012 6:38 PM, Farm1 wrote:
>> "Gillard=Dudd in a frock." <flatulantdingo@deadspam.com> wrote in message
>>
>>> Janet Albrechtsen:
>>
>> Of whom it is said that she is a "right wing rage machine" and that
>> "She's
>> carved out a nich as Australia's answer to Ayn Rand: anyone who's anyone
>> in
>> conservative intellectual circles read her, as do the bigwigs int he
>> Liberal
>> party".
>
> Classic leftist demonisation tactic - "Australia's answer to Ayn Rand" -
> as if that is supposed to be mean something.
> PS: Ayn Rand is awesome!

LOL. Tea Baggers and Republicans all love Ayn Rand. I have no desire
whatsoever to live in an American style society. Too many loonies and
trailer trash.

> You people cannot communicate anymore. You're pathetic.

Well you certainly manage to communicate that you are neither well educated
nor well informed.
>
>>
>> "Conservative intellectual circles" is a condradiction in terms.
>>
>
> You wouldn't know what 'intellectual' was if it bit you on the oyster.

LOL. Tired, unoriginal and lacking in imagination but typical of you
Foster.


bringyagrogalong

10/11/2012 9:48:00 AM

0

"Farm1" <H...@there.sometimes> wrote:
> "Gillard=Dudd in a frock." <flatulantdi...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
>
> > Janet Albrechtsen:
>
> Of whom it is said that she is a "right wing rage machine" and that "She's
> carved out a nich as Australia's answer to Ayn Rand: anyone who's anyone in
> conservative intellectual circles read her, as do the bigwigs int he Liberal
> party".
>
> "Conservative intellectual circles" is a condradiction in terms.

You're not wrong, they're as dumb as horse shit.

Check this out:

A detailed analysis of house of representatives MPs' qualifications
found that:

?(1) The ALP is the most highly qualified (academically) in
parliament ?with 53.36% of all recognised tertiary qualifications
while the LNP ?had only 42.16%.
?(2) The ALP have a total of 83 Bachelor degrees (this includes
multiple degrees for some people) while the LNP had only 51. Most
common degree combination (Arts & Law).
(3) 20.67% of all MHR's have achieved an Honours Degree. 19 ALP, 10
LNP.
(4) The Nationals are the least qualified in terms of how many MHR's
they have and the number of qualifications.

So in brief, in order of intelligence:

1) Labor.
2) Daylight
3) The dumbarse Libs.
4) The hayseed Nationals.

Gee! now there's a surprise.  NOT!