[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

ruby wiki options?

d c

9/28/2006 5:47:00 AM

hi list -

wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
wiki? there seem to be quite a few abandoned projects on rubyforge,
and the instiki site itself is basically out for the count.

any suggested progressing wiki projects?

tx,

/dc

--
-------------------------------------------
David "DC" Collier
mailto:dc@pikkle.com
+81 (0)80 6521 9559
skype: callto://d3ntaku
-------------------------------------------
Pikkle ????
http://www....
-------------------------------------------


--
-------------------------------------------
David "DC" Collier
mailto:dc@pikkle.com
+81 (0)80 6521 9559
skype: callto://d3ntaku
-------------------------------------------
Pikkle ????
http://www....
-------------------------------------------

8 Answers

aidy

9/28/2006 10:38:00 AM

0

dc wrote:

> any suggested progressing wiki projects?

the omnipotent Phlip can help you with that.

http://rubyforge.org/projects/min...

he can help you with most things

aidy

aidy

9/28/2006 12:30:00 PM

0


dc wrote:
> hi list -

> > any suggested progressing wiki projects?


Phlip has a wiki

http://rubyforge.org/projects/min...

aidy

Phlip

9/28/2006 2:26:00 PM

0

aidy wrote:

>> any suggested progressing wiki projects?
>
> the omnipotent Phlip can help you with that.
>
> http://rubyforge.org/projects/min...

Thanks. And try Instiki, or a Rails-oriented Wiki.

My Wiki is "ambitious", which is a software engineering code-word for: "I
spend too much time adding cool features, and not enough time cleaning,
productizing, or extracting insects".

Its base features will work fine out-of-the box, and it has technical and
esthetic details that other Wikis often don't. The RemoteLink system, for
example, is just an example of how this Wiki lets you customize things
in-the-wiki, without resorting to scripts or excess markup.

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.u... <-- NOT a blog!!!


ramalho@gmail.com

10/10/2006 4:56:00 PM

0

dc wrote:
> wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
> wiki? [...]
> any suggested progressing wiki projects?

Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:

http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show...

Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.

[1] http://wiki2go....

The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
RubyForge project has no activity and no files.

[2] http://wikis.onestepbac...

I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.

Cheers,

Luciano

zoat

10/11/2006 2:47:00 PM

0

=> See ''Hiki'' which is a powerful and fast wiki clone written in
Ruby.
http://hikiwi...

ramalho@gmail.com wrote:
> dc wrote:
> > wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
> > wiki? [...]
> > any suggested progressing wiki projects?
>
> Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:
>
> http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show...
>
> Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
> is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
> maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
> people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
> probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.
>
> [1] http://wiki2go....
>
> The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
> but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
> RubyForge project has no activity and no files.
>
> [2] http://wikis.onestepbac...
>
> I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
> instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Luciano

zoat

10/11/2006 7:52:00 PM

0

....see also this guideline using Instiki:
"How to host a personal wiki on your home computer" - Lifehacker
http://www.lifehacker.com/software/feature/geek-to-live--how-to-host-a-personal-wiki-on-your-home-computer-...

zoat wrote:
> => See ''Hiki'' which is a powerful and fast wiki clone written in
> Ruby.
> http://hikiwi...
>
> ramalho@gmail.com wrote:
> > dc wrote:
> > > wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
> > > wiki? [...]
> > > any suggested progressing wiki projects?
> >
> > Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:
> >
> > http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show...
> >
> > Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
> > is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
> > maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
> > people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
> > probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.
> >
> > [1] http://wiki2go....
> >
> > The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
> > but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
> > RubyForge project has no activity and no files.
> >
> > [2] http://wikis.onestepbac...
> >
> > I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
> > instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Luciano

Rob Sanheim

10/12/2006 1:06:00 AM

0

On 10/10/06, ramalho@gmail.com <ramalho@gmail.com> wrote:
> dc wrote:
> > wondering if people have recommendations for a simple to use ruby
> > wiki? [...]
> > any suggested progressing wiki projects?
>
> Looking for the same thing, I found this page helpful:
>
> http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show...
>
> Among those listed, Wiki2Go [1] seemed to me the most promising as it
> is good looking, has significant and active deployments and is actively
> maintained by a group of people. The key phrase here is "a group of
> people", since projects with single maintainers have a much higher
> probability of being abandoned, even if temporarily.
>
> [1] http://wiki2go....
>
> The wiki engine used by RubyGarden itself looks solid. It's called Ruse
> but it "is not being distributed yet" [2] and the corresponding
> RubyForge project has no activity and no files.
>
> [2] http://wikis.onestepbac...
>
> I wonder if anyone knows what's up with Instiki. It seems the
> instiki.org site has been down for many days (weeks?) now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Luciano
>
>
>

The original maintainer of Instiki, Alexey, all but disappeared.
There was a user who took up a branch and merged some fixes and also
opened up a repository. Not sure what the status with that is,
though.

There is also i2, which is a super simple Rails wiki originally
written by DHH. Its behind the official Rails wiki, and I use it to
power the Madison Ruby wiki (http://www.madiso...) with some
simple modifications and a captcha plugin I developed. I like it
because the code base is tiny and easy to change and hack. So the
fact that i2 is not properly maintained isn't that big of an issue, as
it "just works" if you need something simple.

I'm looking forward to Ruse being officially released, as well.

- Rob

--
http://www.robs...
http://www.seekin...
http://www.a...

Lee Enricoso

1/2/2007 10:43:00 PM

0


> There is also i2, which is a super simple Rails wiki originally
> written by DHH. Its behind the official Rails wiki, and I use it to
> power the Madison Ruby wiki (http://www.madiso...) with some
> simple modifications and a captcha plugin I developed. I like it
> because the code base is tiny and easy to change and hack. So the
> fact that i2 is not properly maintained isn't that big of an issue, as
> it "just works" if you need something simple.
>
> I'm looking forward to Ruse being officially released, as well.
>
> - Rob

Can you provide a link where I can download and evaluate the wiki engine
that you mention. I'm in the process of evaluating Wiki engines for my
pet project.

Thanks.

Lee




--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....