jmg3000
9/21/2006 3:06:00 PM
On 9/20/06, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> If www.ruby-lang.org can have a makeover, why not raa.ruby-lang.org?
> [snip]
>
> Of course, what I *really* want is tighter integration with RubyForge.
> [snip]
When I first started using Ruby (fairly recently), I quickly got the
impression that the RAA wasn't really used much anymore, and that
everyone uses RubyForge instead.
The front page of the RAA site doesn't have any "About this site"
link, no site docs, no mention of who the guilty parties are, and the
last news item says that something "is under indefinite suspension"
and is from over a year ago. Also the dates on the projects listed on
the front page don't include the year.
---John