"suebrd" <suebrd@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ec8e1c3b-c095-4a09-adf0-eafb6a37c880@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 2:41 pm, MikeRyder <n...@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:17:17 -0600, "Lee" <4gi...@innocent.com> wrote:
> >"suebrd" <sue...@aol.com> wrote...
> >On Jul 17, 7:57 am, deb <dwal...@tx.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >> The emperor has no clothes. I won?t be your Sergeant, it?s a phony
> >> job, I'd rather be a true friend. EOTS was quite a game and you fell
> >> for your own game. You can not hold even one apart, including you.
> >> Either you?ll stand up or you?ll ride off into the sunset protecting
> >> the lie. There?s no unsubs to hide behind here. It?s up to you.
>
> >::: LOL!!! That was a coffee splatter!!! No, you're Ted's gun mall now,
> >Harshie. Gonna take on the Big Guy. lol. You can't even admit to
> >yourself Ted was Cletus playing a cheap (continuing) game. The
> >Emperor has no clothes indeed. Stories are interesting.
> >____________
>
> >Hi Sue, I suppose it should be noted for the record
> >that Ted Miner has revived the 'pedophilia tactic' that
> >he first used while posting as Cletus, in order to run
> >John Lopez off this list.
>
> And it's interesting to note that lopez ran.
>
> >With all the talk about one
> >person "running so and so off the list," I can think
> >of no other tactic as low or as blatant as this one that
> >has ever been used to that effect. I don't recall that
> >even Katie ever stooped so low as to fabricate direct
> >allegations of pedophilia against her targets here.
>
> I see you want to continue with your fake outrage, flynn. It's
> interesting that such a self-perceived 'holy man' with 'senior
> experience' would stopp to such a manipulative tactic.
>
>
>
> >Are you able to see Ted more clearly as a result of
> >his romp and spin routine here this time around,
> >I wonder? I see a profoundly dishonest, manipulative
> >and patently conniving old "gamer", in almost every
> >post of his that I've reviewed -- going back to 2003.
>
> Obviously you're looking at yourself. Well, that's at least a first
> step for you.
>
> >But even more so this past 2 years, when his whole
> >participation here has revolved around smears, sneers,
> >innuendo and blatant lies.
>
> You mean like you're doing?
>
> >He checks his morals at
> >the door in order to pursue his agenda, each time he
> >shows up in this n.g. (presuming that he concerns
> >himself with ethical restraints, elsewhere ;).
>
> >He's what I call a dishonest player. ;)
>
> And you're an honest player? LOL
>
>
>
> >Ah well.. open newsgroups. Such a bounty of startling
> >gifts and shocking goons.
>
> Take an honest look for once at your own activities in this newsgroup,
> flynn. When you've cleaned up your own act, then you can come back and
> deliver your 'holy' lectures.
>
>
>
> >~ Lee
>
>
What activities would that be, Mike? Exposing Ted as Cletus? Do
tell, you read this stuff...do you really think Wayne sells his wife's
ass for profit and offed a suicidal guy to get his property? And as a
minor point, I'm the sleazeball from hell? Is that how far you will
actually turn to throw your lot in with? The bitch that didn't even
give enough a damn to answer you back when you first told her of your
heart disease? I don't think so, but hey if so, so be it. I'd
prefer an answer tho.
------------
You are really twisting in your viciousness now suebrd.