Carrie
7/16/2009 2:01:00 PM
"mg weber-c." <maz@solcon.nl_> wrote in message
news:4a5f268d$0$18777$703f8584@news.kpn.nl...
> hi John,
>
> I am not disputing anyone's right for self moderation.
> Neither your personal right to engage the clearly
> irrational and unethical. I disagree with your assessment
> that all contributions here are in accord with the charter.
>
> I have zero tolerance for anti-christ rethoric,
> destructive and militant bigotry or cult recruitment,
> chaos teachings and unlawful conduct,
> and i handle my block-sender file accordingly.
This is your issue.
Don't use it to dump YOUR negative and unkind/unloving stuff on the rest
of the newsgroup. And hide it under the guise of keeping the newsgroup the
way it's supposed to be (according to you and your judement)
Focus on what YOU contribute to it that's on topic (whatever you might feel
that is) and how YOU are coming across, i.e. what the course teaches.
I know you have "demanded" I not write to you here, but you have also
stated many times I am on your blocked/killfile list. So, if you are reading
this, you must have taken me off for some reason, and put me back on.
Simple
>
> And, as far as "We cannot know" goes, I do rely
> on my Guidance which tells me whatever I need to know,
> whenever I need to know it. I trust you do the same.
>
> peace, m
>
>
>
>
> "JRad" <jradgosky@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
> news:341d9193-e672-40bf-a035-771edc94dcec@32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 16, 7:46 am, "mg weber-c." <m...@solcon.nl_> wrote:
>> >> I don't think anyone can ever write anything that goes
>>
>> against the charter. <<
>>
>> The charter is against the abuse of this ng for non related
>> topics. such as trolling, gossip, exit therapies, you name it.
>>
>> IOW you can't honestly justify your own contributions to the noise
>> around here by declaring everything is ACIM related, or
>> by denying that lots of writing here is not ACIM related.
>>
>> namazt?
>
> Hey Martin,
>
> But it in that is where my personal "challenge" lies.
>
> Earlier I wrote about "missed opportunities" which the author deals
> with in the text and lessons. And the way I take that, it means that
> every encounter no matter how sublime or grotesque, is still the same
> opportunity. So no matter what the gossip, trolling and exit
> therapies might look like, my choice is to ignore, bless or get
> embroiled. Isn't that what we face out in our 3D worlds where we
> leave this false environment for a more "phyicially connected" one ?
>
> I believe I am in tune with your thoughts about the intent here and
> especially since you are one of the influences which resulted in this
> ng coming to be. So you have a
> "vision" for it, I suppose. But perhaps divinity will guide the
> "vision" in a direction which is more "real". But in all honesty I
> feel the intent has to be left up to each participant, where no one
> else can judge what that intent is. No matter how persistent seems the
> lower intent. We cannot know. Nor can we know the totallity of the
> plan, can we ?
>
> This is how I see the course, it is truly a demanding thought system,
> and yet it is simplicity itself. And what it all boils down to is how
> the course identifies the reason for this is attributed to the ego,
> and from whence it stems, and what the alternative is, and why.
>
> And I know that sometimes for me it is a simple as can be and I sail
> with it in full peace, and at other times I am "upset". And when I
> leave upset I can only laugh at how silly it had been. But it IS a
> strong force. That's why the course came to be. Because of the
> strength of that force.
>
> I just happen to see everything that occurs here has SOMETHING to do
> with the course in some way. Even the parts I just don't like. But
> then, that becomes MY problem.
>
> Happy Thursday
>
> JR
>
>