comp.lang.ruby

Doug H

7/2/2006 7:00:00 PM

Actually I guess it was announced on the ruby-talk list instead of
comp.lang.ruby:
http://groups.google.com/group/ruby-talk-google/browse_frm/thread/d3bcbcb35781b494/329b1c633941af43?q=ruby.net&rnum=2#329b1c...


Doug H wrote:
> Didn't see it announced, so thought I'd share this:
> A beta of Ruby.NET was recently released by Wayne Kelly and John Gough
> (who wrote a book on writing compilers for .NET):
> http://plas.fit.qut.edu.au...
>
> Looks like it requires .NET 2.0. I do not know if it works in mono.
>
> See also RubyCLR, which is a not a .NET version of ruby, but rather a
> bridge between standard ruby and .NET (2.0). It has been in
> development longer and is already very functional:
> http://rubyforge.org/project...