[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

mongrel does not allow to trap INT on Windows

aurelianito

5/1/2006 9:27:00 PM

Hi,

I'm trying the camping web framework under windows with mongrel (with
ruby installed from One Click Ruby installer 16 for Ruby 1.8.4.). And
while I'm able to see the web pages in a browser I'm unable to shut it
down with CTRL-C. Do you know what is the problem?

Any responses will be highly appreciated,
Thank you,
Aureliano.

PS: Below is the code I use to run Mongrel:

require 'mongrel/camping'

Pru1::Models::Base.logger = Logger.new('camping.log')
handler = Mongrel::Camping::CampingHandler.new(Pru1)
server = Mongrel::HttpServer.new("127.0.0.1", "3000")
server.register("/", handler)
server.register("/favicon.ico", Mongrel::Error404Handler.new(""))
thread = server.run
puts "Mongrel started"
trap("INT") { server.stop }
thread.join
2 Answers

Tell it like it is.

10/1/2010 6:38:00 PM

0

On Oct 1, 10:03 am, Zev <zev_h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 4:47 pm, "Tell it like it is."
>
>
>
>
>
> <DanielAlbertDesfos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 1, 2:17 am, Zev <zev_h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 1, 4:32 am, "Tell it like it is."
>
> > > <DanielAlbertDesfos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sep 30, 8:38 pm, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:15:13 +1000, "Harold Black" <n...@bigpond.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >"drahcir" <s...@sgscc.com> wrote in message
> > > > > >news:45daa656lbp7rrctr8lmdokb4b3kerfv4g@4ax.com...
> > > > > >> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:05:06 +1000, "Harold Black" <n...@bigpond.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>>"drahcir" <s...@sgscc.com> wrote in message
> > > > > >>>news:fubaa69edsct5bakef43q61bjp62c54sva@4ax.com...
> > > > >  No refutation means agreement. Refute or you agree. No third
> > > > > option. Here's the reason - if you don't agree, you must have a
> > > > > reason. That reason is how you refute. If you don't refute, you have
> > > > > no reason to disagree,
>
> > > > Maybe he has a reason not to refute because he does disagree, and yet,
> > > > does not feel compelled to refute. Perhaps he like most sane people
> > > > doesn't suffer, Drahcir, from your obsessive compulsive behavior on
> > > > usenet.
>
> > > Nobody's compelled to do anything in the Usenet,
> > > but here he has an opportunity to
> > > present his argument, prove his case.
> > > He doesn't do it.
> > > The simplest explanation is that he can't, and he knows it.
> > > If that's the case, his behavior here could more easily
> > > be described as "obsessive compulsive" than drahcir's.
>
> > > >  therefore you agree. Get it now? You could end
> > > > this all by simply refuting. But, of course, you can't. So, you agree.
> > > > > Thanks for agreeing. You're a very agreeable person, I'm sure most
> > > > > would agree.
>
> > > >       I notice, Drahcir, you have been doing an ad hominem on
> > > > Iconoclast for so long now, that like the holocaust survivor going to
> > > > Israel to protest against Israel 's abusive occupation I feel duty
> > > > bound, like she does, to say are you suffering from incoherence due to
> > > > age or temporary senility as in temporaryly insane.
>
> > > My own approach to Hunter's posts is different.
> > > I avoid ad hominems like the plague.
> > > Usually the result is that after a few iterations, he runs away,
> > > only to return in the following weeks with the same claims
> > > he previously failed to defend successfully.
> > > I've wondered for a long time if ad hominems would save me time,
> > > at no cost in efficiency.
>
> > > BTW, Harold Black is even worse, I'm surprised you haven't noticed.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Zev,
> >              I'm going to give you some good advice. There are things
> > more important to a man than obsessing over the cowardly opinions of
> > psychotics and ethnocentrics. Is that plain enough english? The Holy
> > Bible, written by Messianic Jews, says not every insult deserves a
> > response.-
>
> Messianic Jews?
> You're probably not talking about *my* Bible...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Your Bible better be the first half of every Christian
Bible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I...

Zev

10/2/2010 4:50:00 PM

0

On Oct 1, 8:38 pm, "Tell it like it is."
<DanielAlbertDesfos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 10:03 am, Zev <zev_h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 1, 4:47 pm, "Tell it like it is."
> > <DanielAlbertDesfos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 1, 2:17 am, Zev <zev_h...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Oct 1, 4:32 am, "Tell it like it is."
> > > > <DanielAlbertDesfos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Sep 30, 8:38 pm, drahcir <s...@sgscc.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:15:13 +1000, "Harold Black" <n...@bigpond..com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >"drahcir" <s...@sgscc.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > >news:45daa656lbp7rrctr8lmdokb4b3kerfv4g@4ax.com...
> > > > > > >> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:05:06 +1000, "Harold Black" <n...@bigpond.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>"drahcir" <s...@sgscc.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > >>>news:fubaa69edsct5bakef43q61bjp62c54sva@4ax.com...
> > > > > >  No refutation means agreement. Refute or you agree. No third
> > > > > > option. Here's the reason - if you don't agree, you must have a
> > > > > > reason. That reason is how you refute. If you don't refute, you have
> > > > > > no reason to disagree,
>
> > > > > Maybe he has a reason not to refute because he does disagree, and yet,
> > > > > does not feel compelled to refute. Perhaps he like most sane people
> > > > > doesn't suffer, Drahcir, from your obsessive compulsive behavior on
> > > > > usenet.
>
> > > > Nobody's compelled to do anything in the Usenet,
> > > > but here he has an opportunity to
> > > > present his argument, prove his case.
> > > > He doesn't do it.
> > > > The simplest explanation is that he can't, and he knows it.
> > > > If that's the case, his behavior here could more easily
> > > > be described as "obsessive compulsive" than drahcir's.
>
> > > > >  therefore you agree. Get it now? You could end
> > > > > this all by simply refuting. But, of course, you can't. So, you agree.
> > > > > > Thanks for agreeing. You're a very agreeable person, I'm sure most
> > > > > > would agree.
>
> > > > >       I notice, Drahcir, you have been doing an ad hominem on
> > > > > Iconoclast for so long now, that like the holocaust survivor going to
> > > > > Israel to protest against Israel 's abusive occupation I feel duty
> > > > > bound, like she does, to say are you suffering from incoherence due to
> > > > > age or temporary senility as in temporaryly insane.
>
> > > > My own approach to Hunter's posts is different.
> > > > I avoid ad hominems like the plague.
> > > > Usually the result is that after a few iterations, he runs away,
> > > > only to return in the following weeks with the same claims
> > > > he previously failed to defend successfully.
> > > > I've wondered for a long time if ad hominems would save me time,
> > > > at no cost in efficiency.
>
> > > > BTW, Harold Black is even worse, I'm surprised you haven't noticed.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Zev,
> > >              I'm going to give you some good advice. There are things
> > > more important to a man than obsessing over the cowardly opinions of
> > > psychotics and ethnocentrics. Is that plain enough english? The Holy
> > > Bible, written by Messianic Jews, says not every insult deserves a
> > > response.-
>
> > Messianic Jews?
> > You're probably not talking about *my* Bible...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>             Your Bible better be the first half of every Christian
> Bible.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I...

If you think a Youtube clip from Ralph Nadir's election campaign
of two years ago is related in some way to the comments above,
you really are certifiable.