Akins of that Ilk
4/12/2011 1:51:00 PM
On Apr 12, 8:40 am, Malcolm <Malc...@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <2qg8q6pourmpkgb3sn540c53jvr530e...@4ax.com>, Fred J. McCall
> <fjmcc...@gmail.com> writes
>
>
>
> >Malcolm <Malc...@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>In article <fup6q65ukqqur3ebidno6tq46vataic...@4ax.com>, Scotty
> >><spsc...@gmail.com> writes
> >>>On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 07:42:40 +0100, Malcolm <Malc...@indaal.demon.co.uk>
> >>>wrote:
>
> >>>>In article <epa4q6pr0qe4sr5urq4rku1gj9ee0pl...@4ax.com>, Scotty
> >>>><spsc...@gmail.com> writes
> >>>>>On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:24:52 +0100, Malcolm <Malc...@indaal.demon.co..uk>
> >>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>I don't need any "luck" thank you. I'm a scientist with some knowledge
> >>>>>>of genetics and therefore with the knowledge that there are no human
> >>>>>>"races", whatever "white supremacists" such as yourself would like to
> >>>>>>think.
>
> >>>>>I'm not joining in here but if there are no races then why is the "offence"
> >>>>>racism?
>
> >>>>Because there are those, like Akins "of that Ilk (sic)", who not only
> >>>>think there are different races but regard themselves as superior to
> >>>>other humans on this false basis. They would deny other people, who on
> >>>>the whole don't look like themselves, the same rights and benefits that
> >>>>they have. That denial, and other acts, is described as racism and is,
> >>>>correctly, an offence in many countries, including the USA.
>
> >>>It was a serious question and not in support of Akin as he thought.
>
> >>I answered it seriously.
>
> >>>The concern is: If there are no races then a whole lot of Race and
> >>>anti-discriminatory legislation might be at risk if a smart arse lawyer
> >>>challengers the statement, race gender or creed etc.
>
> >>I think he would fail very quickly because the word "race" as applied to
> >>humans, while it doesn't mean major genetic differences which is what
> >>Akins "of that Ilk (sic)" still wants it to mean, is still in common
> >>usage to describe different populations of humans and thus can be used
> >>in a discriminatory manner.
>
> >So there are only 'races' when it's convenient? That just doesn't
> >seem to wash....
>
> It isn't when it's "convenient", it's all the time. It's a word still in
> use, including by right-wing morons like Akins "of that Ilk (sic)", to
> mean the incorrect splitting of humans into "races". But racial
> discrimination, which is the crime, frequently includes discrimination
> against nationally or ethnically different people who can be just as
> "white" as those who are trying to discriminate against them.
>
> --
> Malcolm- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Incorrect? By whose determination? Certainly not by mine, or by most
individuals who freely admit that there are different races. You are
trying to push an unnatural agenda, Malcolm.