Asp Forum - Re: Windows Registry tool.

Berger, Daniel

3/31/2006 4:05:00 PM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Brown [mailto:gregory.t.brown@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:53 AM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: Windows Registry tool.

<snip>

> >
> > In that case, I would submit a bug report. :)
>
> I'll try to recreate the problem in work today and send it your way.

Send it to ruby-core. It's not part of Win32Utils, if that's what you
were thinking.

Regards,

Dan

4 Answers

Gregory Brown

3/31/2006 4:37:00 PM

On 3/31/06, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gregory Brown [mailto:gregory.t.brown@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:53 AM
> > To: ruby-talk ML
> > Subject: Re: Windows Registry tool.
>
> <snip>
>
> > >
> > > In that case, I would submit a bug report. :)
> >
> > I'll try to recreate the problem in work today and send it your way.
>
> Send it to ruby-core. It's not part of Win32Utils, if that's what you
> were thinking.

will do.

wy

2/12/2013 7:42:00 PM

On Feb 12, 2:26 pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2:07 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 1:32 pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 12, 11:15 am, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 12, 11:13 am, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 12, 10:49 am, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 12, 10:33 am, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 12, 10:16 am, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 10:01 am, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > ss
>
> > > > > > > > > > Very.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's the equation as is.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Remember: the question is what is x?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I posted my answers, hoe could you mis them?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Here they are again, x +
>
> > > > > > > > > > > (-146/30) + sqrt (13964/900) * i
>
> > > > > > > > > > > or
>
> > > > > > > > > > > (-146/30) - sqrt (13964/900) * i
>
> > > > > > > > > > > So, is that right?
>
> > > > > > > > > > Nope.
>
> > > > > > > > > Hmmm, and I was sure I was correct.
>
> > > > > > > > > OK, so what are the right answers?
>
> > > > > > > > There are no right answers. There's just one right answer. Think
> > > > > > > > linear equation and stop being so complicated.
>
> > > > > > > You do know that your it is a quadratic equation, not linear, don't
> > > > > > > you, wy??? So you know what the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra would
> > > > > > > say about that?
>
> > > > > > > But again, if I'm wrong, then I give up. Please post the correct
> > > > > > > answer here:_____________________
>
> > > > > > It's linear. Answer is x=3.
>
> > > > > >http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/solve/solve1/s1...
>
> > > > > The problem that you presented in this thread is not the same as in
> > > > > the link that you provided.
>
> > > > > If you were such an algebra wiz, you wouldn't have written it with
> > > > > such vagueness as over this and that;
>
> > > > > You would have written it as,
>
> > > > > (6x-7)/4 +(3x-5)/7 = (5x+78)/28
>
> > > > > NOW, getting away from your diversion, why is California dumping
> > > > > algebra rather than figuring out how to teach it?
>
> > > > Another right wingnut who refuses to read the original post with the
> > > > correct equation.
>
> > > Allow to quote you directly from one of your own posts.
>
> > > (Begin quote)
>
> > > > > And the 5 over the 7 is a separate set of numbers, not part of the
> > > > > first set of numbers, so break up the line between the two.
> > > > 6x - 7 5 5x + 78
> > > > ------------- - ----- = --------------
> > > > 4 + 3x 7 28
> > > > There, is that right?
>
> > > Yep. Now don't go cheating and start using online calculators like I
> > > know you're going to do.
>
> > > (End quote)
>
> > Right, after you screwed up on the equation by putting the 3x where it
> > shouldn't have been and which wasn't in my original equation that you
> > responded to. But yeah, I know you were optically challenged by all
> > the "over" words I had in it.
>
> Actually, YOU did that! Allow me to quote directly from your post:
>
> (Begin quote)
>
> 6x - 7 - 5 = 5x + 78
> 4 + 3x 7 28

That wasn't my original equation, it was your misinterpretation of it.

>
> Just imagine a line between each set of upper and lower figures. It
> should be so obvious that "over" substitutes for the missing lines.
>
> (End quote)
>
> wy, you should be aware that mathematicians do *not* use the word
> "over" to signify division in their word problems.

I was too lazy to draw lines. Get it? And it should be naturally
understood that one set of numbers will be "over" another set, the
"over" substituting for what would be a line separating them. Get it?

Man of Mind

2/12/2013 7:45:00 PM

On 2/12/2013 1:18 PM, Faulty Sham <wsjames...@gmail.com> whined:
>
> On Feb 12, 11:23 am, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>
>> On 2/12/2013 10:05 AM, Faulty Sham <wsjames...@gmail.com> whined:
>>>
>>> On Feb 12, 10:36 am, Man of Mindwas amused by the mental short-cuts of:
>>>>
>>>> On 2/12/2013 9:33 AM, Faulty Sham <wsjames...@gmail.com> whined/opined:
>>>>>
>>>>> You do know that your it is a quadratic equation, not linear,
>>>>> don't you, wy???
>>>>
>>>> WTF!? Are you off your meds again?
>>>
>>> Hey
>>
>> I'm not solving your problems for you today, Faulty Sham..
>
> OK, how about something simpler

x=3, now go pester someone else with your prattling, cupcakes..

--
"Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental
gestures which seek to resemble ideas"
-Lionel Trilling

Harold Burton

2/12/2013 10:42:00 PM

In article
<8185ac34-ec03-46dc-94f2-3f06a4b75cd9@fd20g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Salty Stan <wsjames123@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 11, 10:19?pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 11, 9:18?pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 11, 6:12?pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Feb 11, 5:56?pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Feb 11, 5:53?pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Feb 11, 5:49?pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Feb 11, 5:32?pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 5:26?pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 5:24?pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 5:19?pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 5:06?pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 4:18?pm, Salty Stan <wsjames...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 9, 12:13?am, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 11:59?pm, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > rd.,Wilmington,D.E"
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <burtonu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 8, 10:21?pm, Car Crashes Mean Car Sales -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GM loves highway
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > criminals <beta...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When will the moronic liberals face up to what
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everyone knows?. Negros
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and hispos are mentally inferior. Hopefully
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > algebra is still available
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as an elective so the whites and asians can
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > take it.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/08/calif...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >onger-requiring-eigh...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > California gives up on math | The Daily Caller
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2/8/2013
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > California will no longer require
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > eighth-graders to take algebra ? a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > move that is line with the Common Core
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > standards being adopted by most
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > states, but that may leave students unprepared
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for college.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Last month, California formally shifted to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Common Core mathematics
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > standards, which recommend that students delay
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > taking algebra if they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aren?t ready for it. Previously, algebra class
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was a requirement for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all eighth-graders in the state.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Black and Latino students in California are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > significantly more likely
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to fail eighth-grade algebra, and 80 percent of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those who fail it once
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will fail it again when they take it in high
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > school.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than all other criminals
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > put together!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NAACP = Negro Affirmative Action, Caucasian
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Persecution
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dumb em' down. Another crop of Gimmeerat voters.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, like you know your algebra. ?Let's see if you
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > actually do:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6x - 7 over 4 + 3x - 5 over 7 = 5x + 78 over 28
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's x?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you clarify the equation a bit? What does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "over..over" mean?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6x - 7 ? - 5 ?= 5x + 78
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4 + 3x ? ?7 ? ? ? ? 28
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Just imagine a line between each set of upper and lower
> > > > > > > > > > > > figures. ?It
> > > > > > > > > > > > should be so obvious that "over" substitutes for the
> > > > > > > > > > > > missing lines.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > One "over" maybe, but "over"..."over" makes no sense.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6x - 7 ? - 5 ? ? ?5x + 78
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ ?= ?--------------
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 4 + 3x ? ?7 ? ? ? ? ?28
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Your question still does make sense - what between the
> > > > > > > > > > > "3x" ?and the
> > > > > > > > > > > "7"?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > And the 5 over the 7 is a separate set of numbers, not part
> > > > > > > > > > of the
> > > > > > > > > > first set of numbers, so break up the line between the two.
> >
> > > > > > > > > ? 6x - 7 ? ? ? ?5 ? ? ? ?5x + 78
> > > > > > > > > ------------- - ?----- ?= ?--------------
> > > > > > > > > ? 4 + 3x ? ? ?7 ? ? ? ? ? ?28
> >
> > > > > > > > > There, is that right?
> >
> > > > > > > > Yep. ?Now don't go cheating and start using online calculators
> > > > > > > > like I
> > > > > > > > know you're going to do.
> >
> > > > > > > And how would you "know" that? You don't even know me.
> >
> > > > > > But I'm right, aren't I?
> >
> > > > > Nope. I don't even use online calculators -don't need to.
> >
> > > > > > Right wingnut math failures can't fool me.
> >
> > > > > Oh the irony..
> >
> > > > Real irony would be if you actually got the right answer, but then
> > > > it's a no-win for you. ?Come up with the wrong answer, you lose; come
> > > > up with the right answer, you used an online calculator, despite what
> > > > you say, and you lose.
> >
> > > Let's simplifying the equation we get
> >
> > > 15x^2 + 146x + 588 = 0
> >
> > > Solving that, the answers I got is (-146/30) + sqrt (13964/900) * i
> > > and its complement.
> >
> > > So, is that right?
> >
> > No, there's no simplifying the equation.
>
> !
>
> Are you serious?

Serious . . . and stupid!!!

>
> >?It's the equation as is.
> > Remember: the question is what is x?
>
> I posted my answers, hoe could you mis them?
>
> Here they are again, x +
>
> (-146/30) + sqrt (13964/900) * i
>
> or
>
> (-146/30) - sqrt (13964/900) * i
>
> So, is that right?

comp.lang.ruby

Re: Windows Registry tool.

Berger, Daniel

Gregory Brown

wy

Man of Mind

Harold Burton

x Login to ForumsZone