Logan Capaldo
3/31/2006 11:48:00 PM
On Mar 31, 2006, at 2:14 AM, v. nainar wrote:
> I found it. What does ruby do with the block if the method does not
> take one ? . Why doesn't ruby check this kind of errors ?
It does nothing with the block. I imagine it doesn't check if a
method takes a block because you'd have to inspect the source of the
method everytime to check if it took one or not, since methods can
change.