Ramine
3/22/2015 2:30:00 AM
On 3/21/2015 7:14 PM, Ramine wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> If you have read my previous post titled: "there is still a big problem"
>
> I think i have understood what is the problem with my reasonning...
>
> I think that even if my previous reasoning appear a good reasonning,
> there is still a "contradiction", because a probability 1/1000000000
> that an event appear, means that the event is really improbable to
> appear, so we can not contradict this logical fact, so what's the
> problem then with my reasonning, i think that a probability of
> 1/1000000000 that an event appear is like saying that the time that it
> takes to the event to appear is like "infinite"(in relation with
> infinity), it is like an axes of real numbers, so if we plug this fact
> in my previous reasonning this will make the time infinite so if we
> start to play the probability of 1/1000000000 it is like if the previous
> time that we were playing is probabilitic and infinite, this will
I mean probabilistic, not probabilitic.
> elevate the contradiction with my previous reasonning of my previous
> reasonning. So we are safe !
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>