konsu
2/8/2006 2:59:00 AM
hello,
given:
1. class C that implements some arbitrary methods
2. a database with code fragments stored as text
i create a variable 'var' of class C and then read some code fragments from
the database. each fragment i read is evaluated in a dynamic anonymous
module, and this module is used to extend 'var':
var = C.new
.. . .
m = Module.new
m.module_eval(code_fragment)
.. . .
var.extend(m)
so if a fragment implements some methods that are already defined in C
mixing in effectively replaces the original methods with the ones defined in
the fragment.
the problem:
class C defines an instance variable @x:
class C
def initialize; @x = 'C'; end
def to_s; @x; end
end
i want to override 'to_s' method. but the new implementation that i have in
my fragment still needs to refer to @x. so i do this:
fragment = "def to_s; foo(@x); end"
this works fine. but this does not seem like a good programming style. a
module refers to a variable that is defined in the object that this module
happens to be mixed in to. can anyone comment on this? basically the problem
is to be able to override the behaviour of 'var' at run time as code
fragments are read.
to give a concrete example of what i am trying to do, suppose you have a
database with text fields. each field is represented at run time by class C
that can be converted to a string. the basic to_s implementation just
outputs the value of the text field. but i want to also store text fields
that contain textile markup, or eruby markup or whatever, in other words i
want to associate a type with each text field and i want the to_s method to
behave differently depending on the type. but for to_s to be able to run it
needs to get the value of the text field from C.
thanks
konstantin