Bill M
1/18/2011 1:23:00 AM
Andrew's tilted mind create all kinds of theories that support his
nonexistent God. I found I wasted my time answering his pure nonsesne.
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:d552l5te9fo6nde20eb90gfie20j3rbn5s@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:35:48 +0000, Andrew <thecroft@macunlimited.net>
> wrote:
>
>>On 2010-01-16 00:26:00 +0000, Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net>
>>said:
>>
>>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:28:40 +0000, Andrew <thecroft@macunlimited.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2010-01-15 22:50:11 +0000, "Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com>
>>>> said:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Jewish Believer in Jesus" <rch00714@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:e353687e-4491-4129-a522-7bec070e3ae4@34g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> I suppose we really do have a dilemma. Is it possible to prove that
>>>>>> there is no God?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to prove there is no Santa Claus?
>>>>
>>>> In principle, probably yes. A being that can consume a mince pie and a
>>>> glass of sherry would be one that is corporeal. Such a being would be
>>>> subject to the known laws of nature. Furthermore, even if we accept the
>>>> possibility that Santa is non-corporeal, the presents he is delivering
>>>> are not. They would be subject to the known laws of nature.
>>>
>>> Not if you allow the same ad hoc getouts Christians use for their God.
>>
>>That would be the God that, in Christ, was scourged, nailed to a cross
>>and died as a consequence, would it? Sound pretty close to the known
>>laws of nature to me.
>
> Ohh looky, a red herring.
>
> But where did you demonstrate that this was any more than just
> religious fiction, because there is no evidence of that outside
> Christian tradition?
>
> Please try not to be so stupid.
>
> And address the point that you can't disprove Santa Claus if you grant
> it the same cop outs.
>