David Vallner
1/11/2006 5:46:00 AM
Shame not, young grasshopper, "substracting" arrays only really makes
perfect sense after you know it's there. Isn't there a verbose name for
the method? I know Java had a removeAll(Collection) method on one of the
collection interfaces since gods know when, so it's not really that
Obscure Voodoo (tm).
David Vallner
Victor Reyes wrote:
>Ezra,
>Thanks a bunch.
>This is soooooooooo simple that it is laughable.
>I guess I need to read my Ruby books a bit more.
>
>Thanks again
>
>On 1/9/06, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Jan 9, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Victor Reyes wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I have two arrays of different sizes.
>>>Right now via find_all I can find all the elements that are common
>>>to both
>>>arrays.
>>>All the elements in the smaller arrays can be found in the larger
>>>array.
>>>
>>>What I would like to find now is all th elements that are in the
>>>larger
>>>array and missing on the smaller array.
>>>I know I can iterate and compare each element within a nested loop.
>>>But is there a way to print out the elements that are missing from the
>>>smaller array without having to implement a nested loop?
>>>
>>>Thank you
>>>
>>>Victor
>>>
>>>
>>Like this?
>>
>>irb(main):009:0> a = [1,2,3,4,5]
>>=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>>irb(main):010:0> b = [1,2,3]
>>=> [1, 2, 3]
>>irb(main):011:0> a - b
>>=> [4, 5]
>>
>>Cheers-
>>-Ezra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>