[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Re: ruby 1.8.4 released

Patrick Bennett

12/27/2005 7:15:00 PM

Better optimizations...

Patrick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curt Hibbs [mailto:ml.chibbs@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: Re: ruby 1.8.4 released
>
> Is their any advantage to using VS2005 C++?
>
> Curt
>



10 Answers

Austin Ziegler

12/27/2005 8:26:00 PM

0

On 27/12/05, Bennett, Patrick <Patrick.Bennett@inin.com> wrote:
> Better optimizations...

At least in theory, yes. More importantly: 1) it is now the supported
version of the compiler; 2) the PSDK includes the support necessary to
support Win32 and Win64 (both x86-64 and IA64). Both Microsoft and
Apple have placed big bets on x86-64, so compiling with the proper
compiler will at least make it that much easier to work with when we
start compiling for Win64.

-austin
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
* Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca


Austin Ziegler

12/27/2005 8:28:00 PM

0

On 27/12/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27/12/05, Bennett, Patrick <Patrick.Bennett@inin.com> wrote:
> > Better optimizations...
>
> At least in theory, yes. More importantly: 1) it is now the supported
> version of the compiler; 2) the PSDK includes the support necessary to
> support Win32 and Win64 (both x86-64 and IA64). Both Microsoft and
> Apple have placed big bets on x86-64, so compiling with the proper
> compiler will at least make it that much easier to work with when we
> start compiling for Win64.

...on the other hand, it will face the same difficulty that is still
currently faced from time to time with respect to VC6 extensions
working with VC7 and VC7.1 extensions. I am looking at recompiling
everything that the winstaller uses with VC8 (which is, in fact
version 14 of the compiler). You'll see that there are a few
incompatibilities with the Ruby build process if you look on
ruby-core.

-austin
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
* Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca


Curt Hibbs

12/28/2005 2:59:00 AM

0

I think I'm going to stick with VC++ 7.1 for this round. I have a
limited amount of time, and I know people are anxious to get their
hands on a 1.8.4 version of the one-click installer.

Curt

On 12/27/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27/12/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 27/12/05, Bennett, Patrick <Patrick.Bennett@inin.com> wrote:
> > > Better optimizations...
> >
> > At least in theory, yes. More importantly: 1) it is now the supported
> > version of the compiler; 2) the PSDK includes the support necessary to
> > support Win32 and Win64 (both x86-64 and IA64). Both Microsoft and
> > Apple have placed big bets on x86-64, so compiling with the proper
> > compiler will at least make it that much easier to work with when we
> > start compiling for Win64.
>
> ...on the other hand, it will face the same difficulty that is still
> currently faced from time to time with respect to VC6 extensions
> working with VC7 and VC7.1 extensions. I am looking at recompiling
> everything that the winstaller uses with VC8 (which is, in fact
> version 14 of the compiler). You'll see that there are a few
> incompatibilities with the Ruby build process if you look on
> ruby-core.
>
> -austin
> --
> Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
> * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca
>
>


Nakada, Nobuyoshi

12/28/2005 3:11:00 AM

0

Hi,

At Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:59:12 +0900,
Curt Hibbs wrote in [ruby-talk:172735]:
> I think I'm going to stick with VC++ 7.1 for this round. I have a
> limited amount of time, and I know people are anxious to get their
> hands on a 1.8.4 version of the one-click installer.

I rather recommend VC6 or gcc -mnocygwin.

--
Nobu Nakada


George Moschovitis

12/28/2005 9:04:00 AM

0

Thanks a lot! Merry Xmas to all ruby hackers!

-g.

On 12/28/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:59:12 +0900,
> Curt Hibbs wrote in [ruby-talk:172735]:
> > I think I'm going to stick with VC++ 7.1 for this round. I have a
> > limited amount of time, and I know people are anxious to get their
> > hands on a 1.8.4 version of the one-click installer.
>
> I rather recommend VC6 or gcc -mnocygwin.
>
> --
> Nobu Nakada
>
>


--
http://www...
http://ww...
http://www.n...


Glenn Smith

12/28/2005 8:07:00 PM

0

I haven't been around for a while so sorry to dive in all of a sudden again
(sadly very little opportunity to use Ruby these days and worse, my beloved
Ruby manuals were burnt to a cinder when our building came-a-cropper from
the Hemel Buncefield Oil-Depot "disaster").

Anyway, the Windows installer for Ruby is still 1.8.2-15 - is this still the
one most people use, or is there a "better way" to get and use Ruby now on a
Windows platform?

Merry Christmas/HNY all!

Glenn


On 12/28/05, George Moschovitis <george.moschovitis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot! Merry Xmas to all ruby hackers!
>
> -g.
>
> On 12/28/05, nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@ge.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:59:12 +0900,
> > Curt Hibbs wrote in [ruby-talk:172735]:
> > > I think I'm going to stick with VC++ 7.1 for this round. I have a
> > > limited amount of time, and I know people are anxious to get their
> > > hands on a 1.8.4 version of the one-click installer.
> >
> > I rather recommend VC6 or gcc -mnocygwin.
> >
> > --
> > Nobu Nakada
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www...
> http://ww...
> http://www.n...
>
>


--

All the best
Glenn
Aylesbury, UK

james_b

12/28/2005 9:17:00 PM

0

Glenn Smith wrote:
> I haven't been around for a while so sorry to dive in all of a sudden again
> (sadly very little opportunity to use Ruby these days and worse, my beloved
> Ruby manuals were burnt to a cinder when our building came-a-cropper from
> the Hemel Buncefield Oil-Depot "disaster").
>
> Anyway, the Windows installer for Ruby is still 1.8.2-15 - is this still the
> one most people use, or is there a "better way" to get and use Ruby now on a
> Windows platform?

Patience.

1.8.2-15 is the current version.

But grep the recent archives for questions on the 1.8.4 version.

James

--

http://www.ru... - Ruby Help & Documentation
http://www.artima.c... - Ruby Code & Style: Writers wanted
http://www.rub... - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jame... - Playing with Better Toys
http://www.30seco... - Building Better Tools


Glenn Smith

12/28/2005 9:54:00 PM

0

OK, patience it is. And perhaps a game of Hearts too :o)

Cheers

Glenn The Firefighter



On 12/28/05, James Britt <james_b@neurogami.com> wrote:
>
> Glenn Smith wrote:
> > I haven't been around for a while so sorry to dive in all of a sudden
> again
> > (sadly very little opportunity to use Ruby these days and worse, my
> beloved
> > Ruby manuals were burnt to a cinder when our building came-a-cropper
> from
> > the Hemel Buncefield Oil-Depot "disaster").
> >
> > Anyway, the Windows installer for Ruby is still 1.8.2-15 - is this still
> the
> > one most people use, or is there a "better way" to get and use Ruby now
> on a
> > Windows platform?
>
> Patience.
>
> 1.8.2-15 is the current version.
>
> But grep the recent archives for questions on the 1.8.4 version.
>
> James
>
> --
>
> http://www.ru... - Ruby Help & Documentation
> http://www.artima.c... - Ruby Code & Style: Writers wanted
> http://www.rub... - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
> http://www.jame... - Playing with Better Toys
> http://www.30seco... - Building Better Tools
>
>


--

All the best
Glenn
Aylesbury, UK

ramrod

1/25/2013 9:33:00 AM

0



Usenet chief Idiot, The Boob wrote in message
news:d4ebbbc8-3752-46d7-bab2-140af7f1dd20@r14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 24, 4:45 am, <ram...@truthonly.com.Sword of Baal> wrote:


>> The usual lies and ravings of the demented Boob, who raves on about me
>> but
>> he has never met me, he does not know where I live or anything about me,

> We know you use a b-rate server don't we? :-) We also know you
> swallow cum because all faggots do and you are old as the dirt you'll
> soon be buried in.


More dribble from this slime bucket The Boob, who simply knows nothing about
me, despite him saying how clever the 'Up The Bums' were are detecting
peoples real names.



More and more of The boob's lies, which all we can expect of this goon.


>> he still lies and lies and lies.
>> Without a doubt he is the most stupid dribbling idiot on the net.
>> Oh yes, I note you never denied you have been thrown off Internet
>> Servers.


> Why bother denying something that everyone with a lick of computer
> sense KNOWS is pure horseshit? you're the only one whining about it,
> poofter. Your 1st grade computer skills are noted...


Said he who started out using WebTV net because he simply did not have the
brains or the money to buy a computer.


//"Bob & Carole" <bobandcarole812@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:22304-3E2830C0-75@storefull-2297.public.lawson.webtv.net...\

Hey slime bucket, be careful or I will chase Scottie up and get him to scare
hell out of you again and make to go and hide again, like you did before,
you coward.

I can understand Scottie doing that to you after posting pictures of his
mother with derogatory statements about her, something only a low life piece
of turd like you would do.

No wonder you hide like a coward, that you are.

ramrod

1/27/2013 3:45:00 AM

0



"Usenet Legends bobandcarole £" wrote in message
news:bd0f4343-41fc-4b66-b84e-a38dc9758bd5@px4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...



>> Said he who started out using WebTV net because he simply did not have
>> the
>> brains or the money to buy a computer.
>
>> //"Bob & Carole" <bobandcarole...@webtv.net> wrote in
>> messagenews:22304-3E2830C0-75@storefull-2297.public.lawson.webtv.net...\
> Dead link ..as usual.

So you are in denial that you used to post from webtv.net?

I say you did.