[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

Rake and 1.8.4

Jamis Buck

12/24/2005 7:56:00 PM

Looks like there may be a problem with Rake 0.6.2 and Ruby 1.8.4. If
I have a task that uses either chdir or cd, I get an error:

rake aborted!
no such option: noop
/Users/jamis/ruby184/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1422:in
`fu_check_options'
/Users/jamis/ruby184/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:119:in `cd'
/Users/jamis/ruby184/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.6.2/lib/rake.rb:
640:in `cd'
./rakefile:67

Apparenly, FileUtils.chdir doesn't take the :noop parameter anymore?
I'm working around this by just invoking FileUtils.chdir directly.

- Jamis
3 Answers

Florian Groß

12/24/2005 8:20:00 PM

0

Ross Bamford

12/24/2005 11:01:00 PM

0

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:56:00 -0000, Jamis Buck <jamis@37signals.com> wrote:

> Looks like there may be a problem with Rake 0.6.2 and Ruby 1.8.4. If I
> have a task that uses either chdir or cd, I get an error:
>
> rake aborted!
> no such option: noop
> /Users/jamis/ruby184/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:1422:in
> `fu_check_options'
> /Users/jamis/ruby184/lib/ruby/1.8/fileutils.rb:119:in `cd'
> /Users/jamis/ruby184/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.6.2/lib/rake.rb:
> 640:in `cd'
> ./rakefile:67
>
> Apparenly, FileUtils.chdir doesn't take the :noop parameter anymore? I'm
> working around this by just invoking FileUtils.chdir directly.
>
> - Jamis
>

IIRC I encountered this very bug some time ago, with 1.8.3. The advice I
found at the time was to switch to a beta version, 0.6.99.2, which you can
find at: http://onestepback.org/betagems/gems/rake-0.... . Since
making the switch I've encountered no such problems; I've just tried the
following Rakefile with 1.8.4:

task :default do
chdir('..') do
puts `pwd`
end
end

And it gives:

(in /home/rosco/dev/ruby/raketest)
cd ..
/home/rosco/dev/ruby
cd -


--
Ross Bamford - rosco@roscopeco.remove.co.uk

Jim Weirich

12/27/2005 4:33:00 PM

0

Ross Bamford wrote:

> IIRC I encountered this very bug some time ago, with 1.8.3. The advice I
> found at the time was to switch to a beta version, 0.6.99.2, which you
> can
> find at: http://onestepback.org/betagems/gems/rake-0.... . Since
> making the switch I've encountered no such problems; I've just tried the
> following Rakefile with 1.8.4:

Rake 0.6.99.2 is the release candidate for Rake 0.7.0. There is still
some documentation to be done, but I plan to finish that this week and
officially release a new version of rake.

--
-- Jim Weirich



--
Posted via http://www.ruby-....