[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

pl.comp.programming

Starenki program pisany w Clipperze

arturdebski

9/7/2007 2:12:00 PM

Witam wszystkich,

Porzebuje uruchomic na Windows XP w trybie pelnoekranowym
leciwy juz program napisany w Clipperze jednak okno programu
nie otwiera sie na calym ekranie tylko na jego górnej polowie.

Plik wsadowy do którego jest utworzony skrót
uruchamiajacy program nie zawiera zadnych wskazówek
co do parametrów wyswietlania.

W wlasciwosciach skrótu do pliku wsadowego mam zaznaczona opcje
"Pelny ekran"

Próbowalem we wlaciwosciach skrótu zaznaczac opcje
uruchamiania w trybie zgodnosci z Windows 98 (pod windows 98 ten sam
program chodzi ok) ale to nic nie zmienilo.

Domyslam sie ze w skrócie uruchamiajacym program lub bezposrednio
w pliku BAT do którego prowadzi skrót nalezy umiescic jakies
"zaklecia" ustawiajace parametry ekranu przed uruchomieniem programu

Moze ktos ma jakis pomysl jak to rozwiazac?

Z góry dziekuje

Pozdrawiam
--
Artur Debski
http://pl.solar...

5 Answers

Andrzej P. Wozniak

9/7/2007 4:23:00 PM

0

Osoba podpisana jako arturdebski@gmail.com <arturdebski@gmail.com> w
artykule <news:1189174294.416903.192010@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> pisze:

> Witam wszystkich,
>
> Porzebuje uruchomia na Windows XP w trybie pe3noekranowym

Dlaczego nie zadasz pytania grupie w3a?ciwej dla systemu operacyjnego?
Windows XP nale?? do rodziny NT.

> leciwy juz program napisany w Clipperze jednak okno programu
> nie otwiera sie na ca3ym ekranie tylko na jego górnej po3owie.

Mog3e? te? zadaa pytanie grupie bazodanowej. Jeszcze lepiej by? zrobi3
przeszukuj?c archiwa wskazanych grup.

> Plik wsadowy do którego jest utworzony skrót
> uruchamiaj?cy program nie zawiera ?adnych wskazówek
> co do parametrów wy?wietlania.
>
> W w3a?ciwo?ciach skrótu do pliku wsadowego mam zaznaczon? opcje
> "Pe3ny ekran"

Zmieni3e? sposób wy?wietlania konsoli, ale nie zmieni3e? jej rozmiarów - w
WinXP domy?lnie jest to 80 kolumn na 300 wierszy. Clipper bez problemów
obs3uguje konsole 50 wierszy, o ile w programie zostanie ustawiony taki
tryb, domy?lnie jest 25 wierszy.

> Próbowa3em we w3aciwo?ciach skrótu zaznaczaa opcje
> uruchamiania w trybie zgodno?ci z Windows 98 (pod windows 98 ten sam
> program chodzi ok) ale to nic nie zmieni3o.

Bo nie o to chodzi.

> Domyslam sie ?e w skrócie uruchamiajacym program lub bezpo?rednio
> w pliku BAT do którego prowadzi skrót nale?y umiescic jakie?
> "zaklecia" ustawiaj?ce parametry ekranu przed uruchomieniem programu

Mo?na te? poprawia plik wsadowy dopisuj?c przed uruchomieniem programu
polecenie wymuszaj?ce w3a?ciwy tryb pracy konsoli:

mode con cols=80 lines=25

Zaklea ?adnych nie potrzeba, co najwy?ej "Use Google, Luke!".

> Mo?e kto? ma jaki? pomys3 jak to rozwi?zaa?

Korzystaa z Google Groups nie tylko do pisania, ale te? do szukania i
czytania.

--
Andrzej P. Wo?niak uszer@pochta.onet.pl (zamien miejscami z<->h w adresie)
Grand Inquisitor pl.comp.bazy-danych No.1 http://www.d...
Clipper Mini FAQ po polsku http://clipp...

Giles

8/28/2009 9:50:00 AM

0

Jon? wrote:
> On Aug 28, 10:04 am, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Jon? wrote:
>>> Britain?s ?baby boom? is due to the colossal importation of immigrants
>>> from third word countries. Mothers from these countries who have
>>> settled in Britain now account for more than half of all births in
>>> this country in some areas. A total of 408,000 people were added to
>>> the UK population last year........The biggest increase for almost 50
>>> years.
>>> There were 791,000 babies born in 2008, an increase of 33,000 on
>>> 2007.The ONS figures show that 56 percent of that increase was to
>>> women born overseas, but living in Britain. Even the claimed rise in
>>> fertility rates, from 1.63 in 2001 to 1.96 last year from what the ONS
>>> report described as ?British born? mothers, is directly attributable
>>> to second and third generation immigrant mothers. As a result, the
>>> population of Britain is now growing by 0.7 percent a year, more than
>>> double the rate in the 1990s and three times the level of the 1980s.
>>> The left-wing controlled media (often foreign owned) and Labour's
>>> publicity department the BBC, have tried and are trying, to create the
>>> impression amongst the public, that ?immigration has decreased? and
>>> that the baby boom is from ?British? people??..When in reality the
>>> statistics show very clearly that the indigenous native population of
>>> this country is being ethnically cleansed from this land.
>>> Left unchecked, Third World immigrants and their descendants are set
>>> to become the majority population of Britain within the next 30 or 40
>>> years. London will become ?Londonistan? and Birmingham will be renamed
>>> ?Brummystan???.The rest of the country will also, eventually, be
>>> renamed to suit the new population that have ousted the old Anglo
>>> Saxon and Celtic indigenous peoples.
>>> Is this all part of a plan????.Or!???..Has it happened because of the
>>> stupidity and obdurate unwillingness of the indigenous British people
>>> to face facts and recognise the dangers that they and, in particular,
>>> their children are in?
>> Of course it's part of a plan, Jon. A plan that has been in existence,
>> and ruthlessly executed, for a very long time.
>>
>> The 'British people' you would be perfectly justified to berate were it
>> not for the fact that they have been ignored, lied to, and legislated
>> against - to the effect that it is now sometimes a crime not to express
>> great joy at the planned colonisation and replacement.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ?It is like watching a nation busily building it?s own funeral pyre?.
>> And he was correct - except for the fact that only its treacherous
>> leaders were thus engaged!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> I tend to agree Farmer but who do you think is behind the plan?
>
> I have ?chosen? have you ?chosen? also?

Yes, Jon, I have definitely 'chosen'. ;-)

Jon°

8/28/2009 9:51:00 AM

0

On Aug 28, 10:49 am, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Jon° wrote:
> > On Aug 28, 10:04 am, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> Jon° wrote:
> >>> Britain’s ‘baby boom’ is due to the colossal importation of immigrants
> >>> from third word countries. Mothers from these countries who have
> >>> settled in Britain now account for more than half of all births in
> >>> this country in some areas. A total of 408,000 people were added to
> >>> the UK population last year........The biggest increase for almost 50
> >>> years.
> >>> There were 791,000 babies born in 2008, an increase of 33,000 on
> >>> 2007.The ONS figures show that 56 percent of that increase was to
> >>> women born overseas, but living in Britain. Even the claimed rise in
> >>> fertility rates, from 1.63 in 2001 to 1.96 last year from what the ONS
> >>> report described as “British born” mothers, is directly attributable
> >>> to second and third generation immigrant mothers. As a result, the
> >>> population of Britain is now growing by 0.7 percent a year, more than
> >>> double the rate in the 1990s and three times the level of the 1980s.
> >>> The left-wing controlled media (often foreign owned) and  Labour's
> >>> publicity department the BBC, have tried and are trying, to create the
> >>> impression amongst the public, that “immigration has decreased” and
> >>> that the baby boom is from “British” people……..When in reality the
> >>> statistics show very clearly that the indigenous native population of
> >>> this country is being ethnically cleansed from this land.
> >>> Left unchecked, Third World immigrants and their descendants are set
> >>> to become the majority population of Britain within the next 30 or 40
> >>> years. London will become “Londonistan” and Birmingham will be renamed
> >>> “Brummystan“…….The rest of the country will also, eventually, be
> >>> renamed to suit the new population that have ousted the old Anglo
> >>> Saxon and Celtic indigenous peoples.
> >>> Is this  all part of a plan?……….Or!………..Has it happened because of the
> >>> stupidity and obdurate unwillingness of the indigenous British people
> >>> to face facts and recognise the dangers that they and, in particular,
> >>> their children are in?
> >> Of course it's part of a plan, Jon. A plan that has been in existence,
> >> and ruthlessly executed, for a very long time.
>
> >> The 'British people' you would be perfectly justified to berate were it
> >> not for the fact that they have been ignored, lied to, and legislated
> >> against - to the effect that it is now sometimes a crime not to express
> >> great joy at the planned colonisation and replacement.
>
> >>> “It is like watching a nation busily building it’s own funeral pyre“.
> >> And he was correct - except for the fact that only its treacherous
> >> leaders were thus engaged!- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > I tend to agree Farmer but who do you think is behind the plan?
>
> > I have “chosen” have you “chosen” also?
>
> Yes, Jon, I have definitely 'chosen'. ;-)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I wonder if I "raced" there before you?

Giles

8/28/2009 9:59:00 AM

0

Jon? wrote:
> On Aug 28, 10:49 am, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> Jon? wrote:
>>> On Aug 28, 10:04 am, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> Jon? wrote:
>>>>> Britain?s ?baby boom? is due to the colossal importation of immigrants
>>>>> from third word countries. Mothers from these countries who have
>>>>> settled in Britain now account for more than half of all births in
>>>>> this country in some areas. A total of 408,000 people were added to
>>>>> the UK population last year........The biggest increase for almost 50
>>>>> years.
>>>>> There were 791,000 babies born in 2008, an increase of 33,000 on
>>>>> 2007.The ONS figures show that 56 percent of that increase was to
>>>>> women born overseas, but living in Britain. Even the claimed rise in
>>>>> fertility rates, from 1.63 in 2001 to 1.96 last year from what the ONS
>>>>> report described as ?British born? mothers, is directly attributable
>>>>> to second and third generation immigrant mothers. As a result, the
>>>>> population of Britain is now growing by 0.7 percent a year, more than
>>>>> double the rate in the 1990s and three times the level of the 1980s.
>>>>> The left-wing controlled media (often foreign owned) and Labour's
>>>>> publicity department the BBC, have tried and are trying, to create the
>>>>> impression amongst the public, that ?immigration has decreased? and
>>>>> that the baby boom is from ?British? people??..When in reality the
>>>>> statistics show very clearly that the indigenous native population of
>>>>> this country is being ethnically cleansed from this land.
>>>>> Left unchecked, Third World immigrants and their descendants are set
>>>>> to become the majority population of Britain within the next 30 or 40
>>>>> years. London will become ?Londonistan? and Birmingham will be renamed
>>>>> ?Brummystan???.The rest of the country will also, eventually, be
>>>>> renamed to suit the new population that have ousted the old Anglo
>>>>> Saxon and Celtic indigenous peoples.
>>>>> Is this all part of a plan????.Or!???..Has it happened because of the
>>>>> stupidity and obdurate unwillingness of the indigenous British people
>>>>> to face facts and recognise the dangers that they and, in particular,
>>>>> their children are in?
>>>> Of course it's part of a plan, Jon. A plan that has been in existence,
>>>> and ruthlessly executed, for a very long time.
>>>> The 'British people' you would be perfectly justified to berate were it
>>>> not for the fact that they have been ignored, lied to, and legislated
>>>> against - to the effect that it is now sometimes a crime not to express
>>>> great joy at the planned colonisation and replacement.
>>>>> ?It is like watching a nation busily building it?s own funeral pyre?.
>>>> And he was correct - except for the fact that only its treacherous
>>>> leaders were thus engaged!- Hide quoted text -
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>> I tend to agree Farmer but who do you think is behind the plan?
>>> I have ?chosen? have you ?chosen? also?
>> Yes, Jon, I have definitely 'chosen'. ;-)- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> I wonder if I "raced" there before you?

It would have to have been quite a few years ago if you did!

Andy

8/28/2009 11:01:00 AM

0

On 28 Aug, 10:58, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Jon° wrote:
> > On Aug 28, 10:49 am, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> Jon° wrote:
> >>> On Aug 28, 10:04 am, Farmer Giles <gi...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >>>> Jon° wrote:
> >>>>> Britain’s ‘baby boom’ is due to the colossal importation of immigrants
> >>>>> from third word countries. Mothers from these countries who have
> >>>>> settled in Britain now account for more than half of all births in
> >>>>> this country in some areas. A total of 408,000 people were added to
> >>>>> the UK population last year........The biggest increase for almost 50
> >>>>> years.
> >>>>> There were 791,000 babies born in 2008, an increase of 33,000 on
> >>>>> 2007.The ONS figures show that 56 percent of that increase was to
> >>>>> women born overseas, but living in Britain. Even the claimed rise in
> >>>>> fertility rates, from 1.63 in 2001 to 1.96 last year from what the ONS
> >>>>> report described as “British born” mothers, is directly attributable
> >>>>> to second and third generation immigrant mothers. As a result, the
> >>>>> population of Britain is now growing by 0.7 percent a year, more than
> >>>>> double the rate in the 1990s and three times the level of the 1980s.
> >>>>> The left-wing controlled media (often foreign owned) and  Labour's
> >>>>> publicity department the BBC, have tried and are trying, to create the
> >>>>> impression amongst the public, that “immigration has decreased” and
> >>>>> that the baby boom is from “British” people……..When in reality the
> >>>>> statistics show very clearly that the indigenous native population of
> >>>>> this country is being ethnically cleansed from this land.
> >>>>> Left unchecked, Third World immigrants and their descendants are set
> >>>>> to become the majority population of Britain within the next 30 or 40
> >>>>> years. London will become “Londonistan” and Birmingham will be renamed
> >>>>> “Brummystan“…….The rest of the country will also, eventually, be
> >>>>> renamed to suit the new population that have ousted the old Anglo
> >>>>> Saxon and Celtic indigenous peoples.
> >>>>> Is this  all part of a plan?……….Or!………..Has it happened because of the
> >>>>> stupidity and obdurate unwillingness of the indigenous British people
> >>>>> to face facts and recognise the dangers that they and, in particular,
> >>>>> their children are in?
> >>>> Of course it's part of a plan, Jon. A plan that has been in existence,
> >>>> and ruthlessly executed, for a very long time.
> >>>> The 'British people' you would be perfectly justified to berate were it
> >>>> not for the fact that they have been ignored, lied to, and legislated
> >>>> against - to the effect that it is now sometimes a crime not to express
> >>>> great joy at the planned colonisation and replacement.
> >>>>> “It is like watching a nation busily building it’s own funeral pyre“.
> >>>> And he was correct - except for the fact that only its treacherous
> >>>> leaders were thus engaged!- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>> I tend to agree Farmer but who do you think is behind the plan?
> >>> I have “chosen” have you “chosen” also?
> >> Yes, Jon, I have definitely 'chosen'. ;-)- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > I wonder if I "raced" there before you?
>
> It would have to have been quite a few years ago if you did!

And I'm having a real difficulty thinking up a suitable anal
remark....

shit i've dropped the soap...

**ouch**

**aaggh**

ok jonny boy, i guess you're the daddy

better leave this thread, it's like a borstall shower in here....