pl.comp.programming

Harold Burton

9/27/2013 3:03:00 AM

In article <qahc19tdo7abcbjs4kmjmi5evsei2gs59t@4ax.com>,
Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:07:49 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Ben Kaufman" <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote in message
> >news:nbu51996urgdv1g4rpi96uitqt5se8m18u@4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:22:23 -0400, "Scout"
> >> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>"Ben Kaufman" <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote in
> >>>message
> >>>news:sm4m095httflto9cl4q4n6h83uq418ugt5@4ax.com...
> >>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:17:20 -0400, "Scout"
> >>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>"Ben Kaufman" <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-dollars@pobox.com> wrote in
> >>>>>message
> >>>>>news:6aaj09hglmok4ln1htjou778nbkt4ic113@4ax.com...
> >>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:13:26 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> >>>>>> <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Ben Kaufman wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Like the Republican assault on constitutional voting rights?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You mean that the dead and non citizens should be allowed to vote
> >>>>>>>multiple times?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The GOP has already admitted it's not about voter fraud so quit
> >>>>>> pretending
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>> an infinitesimally small number of cases of fraud at the polls
> >>>>>> justifies
> >>>>>> denying
> >>>>>> millions of people the ability to vote.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Please prove that it would deny millions of legitimate voters the
> >>>>>ability
> >>>>>to
> >>>>>vote.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>----> You can insert your cites here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&...
> >>>
> >>>"Survey....could deny...."
> >>>
> >>>IOW, opinion not fact.
> >>
> >> No, this is more than just "an opinion", it is based upon factual data.
> >
> >Then why the weasel wording? What not something more conclusive?
> >
> >Maybe because the data doesn't support more than a suggestion?
> >
> >>>
> >>>Next.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/downl...
> >>>> 9242.pdf
> >>>
> >>>Indicates they don't currently have such ID, not that they couldn't get
> >>>it,
> >>>and since it's free to obtain....
> >>>
> >> Wrong, it's not free to get, because there is a net cost associated with
> >> getting
> >> it, and especially if one has a changed married name or needs to take off
> >> time
> >> from work to do so.
> >
> >Right, so I should be reimbursed for having to drive down to register to
> >vote, and each time I go to the polls.
>
> Ah, did you say "drive?" That means you have a drivers license and a car.
> So you don't have to go through the time and expense to get a voter ID card.



No, you have to go to a FAR greater time and expense than getting a
voter ID card.

So your point was? and BTW what does this have to do with
rec.crafts.metalworking?

Why do leftards refuse to answer that simple question?


snicker