RobinS
8/27/2008 3:36:00 PM
"Oriane" <oriane@noemail.noemail> wrote in message
news:up7iBECCJHA.3484@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
> "RobinS" <robins@imnottelling.com> a écrit dans le message de
> news:VbGdne7lfq1VZCnVnZ2dnUVZ_hednZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> My company is considering moving up from .Net 2.0 to .Net 3.5(SP1) as a
>> prerequisite on the ClickOnce deployment for our application.
>>
>> Does anybody have any experience deploying .Net 3.5 either as a
>> prerequisite, or just by itself? Have you had any problems installing it?
> No I haven't any experience of this kind.
Do you mean you haven't had any experience deploying it, or you haven't had
any problems?
>
>> One issue I've seen reported is when pushed as a prerequisite, it
>> progresses so far during installation, then sits there for a long time
>> seemingly doing nothing, and then finishes. Has anyone seen this?
> Yes it is. the 3.5 installation is very slow !
> But you should notice that ClickOnce has been enhanced with the 3.5 SP1,
> and perhaps you could deploy the SP1...
>
We would definitely deploy .Net 3.5 SP-1; we have already updated our
versions of Visual Studio. I'm not sure that would be any smaller than .Net
2.0, although I have heard rumors that it is better at "partial installs",
i.e. if the user already has .Net 2.0, it only installs the extra bits.
Thanks,
RobinS.
GoldMail.com