Clay
4/3/2009 10:33:00 AM
On Apr 2, 10:14 pm, "Billary/2008" wrote:
...
> On Apr 2, 9:28 pm, ignoramus continues to live up to his nick <LOL>:
>
>
> > On Apr 2, 5:52 pm, "Billary/2008" <BillaryClinton2...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 2, 5:48 pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 2, 5:43 pm, ignoramus lives up to his nick <LOL>:
> > > > ...
>
> > > > > On Apr 2, 1:00 pm, "Billary/2008" <BillaryClinton2...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Apr 2, 2:18 pm, ignoramus wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 2, 10:30 am, Capt. Morgan <mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > >On Apr 2, 8:48 am, this poster wrote:
> > > > > > > > > ...
>
> > > > > > > > >> Mitchell Holman embarrassed himself -- yet again:
>
> > > > > > > > >> >"Billary/2008" <BillaryClinton2...@gmail.com> wrote in news:22fe8d87-
> > > > > > > > >> >2aed-41ad-a85c-2c173b318...@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:
>
> > > > > > > > >> >> On Apr 1, 5:34 pm, Clay <ClaysRi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>> Total Viewers: (L +SD)
> > > > > > > > >> >>> Total day: FNC: 1381 | CNN: 599 | MSNBC: 430 | HLN: 337
> > > > > > > > >> >>> Prime: FNC: 2687 | CNN: 909 | MSNBC: 991 | HLN: 635
> > > > > > > > >> >>> 5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p:
> > > > > > > > >> >> 10p: 11p:
> > > > > > > > >> >>> FNC 2,328,000 2,207,000 2,150,000
> > > > > > > > >> >> 3,598,000 2,493,000 1,749,000
> > > > > > > > >> >>> 1,032,000
> > > > > > > > >> >>> CNN 895,000 795,000 795,000 669,000 1,057,000 1,001,0
> > > > > > > > >> >> 00 558,000
> > > > > > > > >> >>> MSNBC 488,000 389,000 676,000 1,285,000 1,023,000
> > > > > > > > >> >> 665,000 474,000
> > > > > > > > >> >>> HLN 229,000 364,000 521,000 914,000 366,000 662,000 352,000
>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> ---------------------------------
>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> More carnage from the cable news ratings world.
>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> FOXNews' average for Monday night was 2,222,429 viewers.
>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> The numbers are amazing !!!
>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> -C-
>
> > > > > > > > >> >> FOXNEWS Rocks. So does Fox Business channel.
>
> > > > > > > > >> > You mean the Fox Business Channel that predicted cuts in
> > > > > > > > >> >the prime rate because of the advice of ......an ASTROLOGER?
>
> > > > > > > > >> It was a one time interview with author Constance Stellas.
>
> > > > > > > > >Obvious a "morning show goof".
>
> > > > > > > > CNBC has Jim Cramer and lately has been ridiculed for giving bad
> > > > > > > > advice.
>
> > > > > > > > FNC has "Fox & Friends" which has its share of covering serious issues
> > > > > > > > and fluff pieces. It is also cable's number one morning program. FBN
> > > > > > > > has "Money for Breakfast." FBN's web site describes it "A clash of
> > > > > > > > people, policy & politics!" With politics it can never be serious.
> > > > > > > > Its main competitor is CNBC's "Sqawk Box."
>
> > > > > > > > >> It wasn't an advice. It was a prediction. It was a "fun" segment made
> > > > > > > > >> during the breakfast hour. It was obviously a fluff piece used to fill
> > > > > > > > >> in three hours of morning programming. Anyone who would take
> > > > > > > > >> financial advice from an astrologer is a dolt.
>
> > > > > > > > >You just described Mitch... "king of the dolts".
>
> > > > > > > > ><LOL>
>
> > > > > > > > >> It's hard to get a handle how FBN compares to CNBC since FBN is only
> > > > > > > > >> on 1/3 of the households than CNBC. That's why Fox News is pushing for
> > > > > > > > >> viewers to notify their cable provider to carry FBN. That's how Fox
> > > > > > > > >> News got its start.
>
> > > > > > > > >Folks forget that, for the longest time, New Yorkers couldn't see
> > > > > > > > >FOXNews b/c Time Warner (parent of CNN) blocked it. But as more and
> > > > > > > > >more cable providers opened up to FOXNews, FNC came in and kicked ass.
>
> > > > > > > > My cable provider didn't have Fox News until subscibers in my town
> > > > > > > > flooded our cable provider with requests for Fox News.
>
> > > > > > > > >FBN is still a kid... CNBC has been around for a long, long time
> > > > > > > > >(remember back in the "day-trader" dayz?).
>
> > > > > > > > CNN was the pioneer of cable news. Fox News came sixteen years later
> > > > > > > > and is kicking ass. CNBC launched in 1989. FBN launched in 2007 and it
> > > > > > > > will probably give CNBC a run for its money in due time.
>
> > > > > > > > >The one thing I hate about both CNBC & FBN... on the weekends, they go
> > > > > > > > >to all-day infomercials.
>
> > > > > > > > >-C-
>
> > > > > > > > They do that probably because Wall Street is closed and Fox News'
> > > > > > > > Saturday morning programming covers business news with some of the
> > > > > > > > talent from FBN.
>
> > > > > > > > ===Dollars & Commonsense===
>
> > > > > > > > "If you put the federal government in charge
> > > > > > > > of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a
> > > > > > > > shortage of sand."
> > > > > > > > -Milton Friedman- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > Well, there are a lot of sheep in the republican party. You know,
> > > > > > > blue-collared dumbfucks who, despite getting shat on every day by
> > > > > > > their party's policies, still willingly come back for more abuse.
> > > > > > > Faux news is merely the conduit that keeps them mad, stupid, and
> > > > > > > masochistic.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > Unlike Keith Dobermann who spits, throws tantrums, waves his arms,
> > > > > > throws papers at the camera. And best of all, mugs the camera with
> > > > > > those precious third grad facial gestures. All while representing
> > > > > > himself as a sober, serious and sophisticated liberal.
> > > > > > HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > But, as you conservatards so repetitively point out, his ratings are
> > > > > far less than those of Faux.
>
> > > > 1) There is no "Faux". There is FOXNews, the #1 cable news channel.
> > > > 2) MSNBC is the station for leftists. There is nothing wrong with
> > > > that.
> > > > 3) CNN has to find its own voice... right now, they're all over the
> > > > map.
>
> > > > Hope that helps, ignoramus.
>
> > > > *snicker*
>
> > > > -C-- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Liberals are having a hard time figuring out why their newspapers are
> > > going out of business. Why their radio stations go bankrupt and why
> > > their cable stations can't attract an audience. It must be because
> > > everyone else is a right wing nutjob. Yeah that's it. The whole
> > > world is stupid. Except for them HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Judging by the last 2 major elections results, it doesn't seem to much
> > matter that the supposed "Liberal" media outlets are failing. Of
> > course, the underlying assumption you're making is that people either
> > get their news only from Faux or from MSNBC, or else why would you
> > assert that Liberals think that "everyone else" who doesn't listen to
> > their is a "right-wing nutjob". You must've missed the fact that the
> > ideological nitwits who get their "news" from Faux is but a small
> > segment of the overall voting-age population, thankfully. There is
> > only so many masochistic morons out there. The size of the gap-
> > toothed drollinger-follower Faux market segment just happens to be
> > larger than the segment of population that get their news from MSNBC.
> > Both segments in total don't come close to comprising the entire
> > voting population.
>
> > Having just proven your statement that I imply "everyone else is
> > stupid" wrong, I'm wondering what feeble excuse you'll come up with
> > next. One can only wonder how the gears are now creaking in that
> > mentally deficient brain of yours.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Like I said. Everyone else is stupid. Here we have yet another
> example of liberal superiority. Clap, Clap, Clap!
Not only that... but only a REAL "ignoramus" would take "two election
cycles" and then form a concrete thesis based on that.
*sigh*
If that were the case, with 2002 & 2004, we'd be close to the first
100 days of a McCain presidency... who's enjoying a House & Senate
dominated by Republicans.
Tell that moron ignoramus that "shit happens / things change".
*sigh*
-C-