[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

[ot?] Per-project RubyGem stats

Tom Copeland

4/29/2005 6:59:00 PM

Howdy -

One nice thing about RubyForge is that you can see how many times your
project has been downloaded. But downloads via RubyGems don't get put
in the RubyForge database, so they don't show up in the charts. This is
sad.

However, you can now get an idea of how many Gem downloads your project
has had in the current month by going (for example) here:

http://gems.rubyforge.org/usage/usage_200504.ht...

This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.

Yours,

Tom




12 Answers

Lyle Johnson

4/29/2005 8:41:00 PM

0

On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:

> This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.

Huh. What are these "Rake" and "Rails" gems that are getting so many downloads?

P.S. That was a joke, people. Lighten up.



Berger, Daniel

4/29/2005 8:46:00 PM

0

Lyle Johnson wrote:
> On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
>
>
>>This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
>
>
> Huh. What are these "Rake" and "Rails" gems that are getting so many downloads?
>
> P.S. That was a joke, people. Lighten up.

Clearly *someone* setup an automatic program to pump their own download
stats. But, I won't mention any names.

KIDDING!

Dan



Chad Fowler

4/29/2005 8:57:00 PM

0

On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> Howdy -
>
> One nice thing about RubyForge is that you can see how many times your
> project has been downloaded. But downloads via RubyGems don't get put
> in the RubyForge database, so they don't show up in the charts. This is
> sad.
>
> However, you can now get an idea of how many Gem downloads your project
> has had in the current month by going (for example) here:
>
> http://gems.rubyforge.org/usage/usage_200504.ht...
>
> This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
>


Nice, Tom!

Do you happen to capture user agent? I'd be _really_ interested in seeing that.

--

Chad Fowler
http://chad...
http://rubyc...
http://ruby...
http://rubygems.rub... (over 300,000 gems served!)



why the lucky stiff

4/29/2005 9:12:00 PM

0

Lyle Johnson wrote:

> Huh. What are these "Rake" and "Rails" gems that are getting so many
> downloads?

You've got a lot of nerve, Lyle. This is EXACTLY the kind of trolling
that gets you killfiled today. *plonk*

>P.S. That was a joke, people. Lighten up.
>
Oh, whoops. Hehe. Cool joke, bud!!

_why


Tom Copeland

4/29/2005 9:14:00 PM

0

On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 05:56 +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
> > http://gems.rubyforge.org/usage/usage_200504.ht...
> >
> > This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
> >
> Nice, Tom!
>
> Do you happen to capture user agent? I'd be _really_ interested in seeing that.

Hm, you know, I'm not capturing that in the HTTP logs now... but GForge
keeps a sort of rolling activity log for the past week or so:

====================================
gforge=> select browser, count(*) from activity_log group by browser;
browser | count
---------+--------
OPERA | 233
MOZILLA | 257478
OTHER | 168405
IE | 77051
(4 rows)

gforge=>
====================================

Where Mozilla == (Firefox|moz|etc), I bet.

Yours,

Tom




Jim Weirich

4/29/2005 9:31:00 PM

0


Daniel Berger said:
> Clearly *someone* setup an automatic program to pump their own download
> stats. But, I won't mention any names.

I confess. My autodownload program is called Rails. Every time someone
installs Rails, it also downloads a copy of Rake.

:)

--
-- Jim Weirich jim@weirichhouse.org http://onest...
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth (in a memo to Peter van Emde Boas)



Chad Fowler

4/30/2005 12:56:00 AM

0

On 4/29/05, Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 05:56 +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
> > > http://gems.rubyforge.org/usage/usage_200504.ht...
> > >
> > > This shows download stats for the top 500 gems for April.
> > >
> > Nice, Tom!
> >
> > Do you happen to capture user agent? I'd be _really_ interested in seeing that.
>
> Hm, you know, I'm not capturing that in the HTTP logs now... but GForge
> keeps a sort of rolling activity log for the past week or so:
>
> ====================================
> gforge=> select browser, count(*) from activity_log group by browser;
> browser | count
> ---------+--------
> OPERA | 233
> MOZILLA | 257478
> OTHER | 168405
> IE | 77051
> (4 rows)
>
> gforge=>
> ====================================
>
> Where Mozilla == (Firefox|moz|etc), I bet.
>

What I was hoping for is stats on gems.rubyforge.org. We report user
agent when people do a remote install, so we could see who's using
what versions.

Thanks!

--

Chad Fowler
http://chad...
http://rubyc...
http://ruby...
http://rubygems.rub... (over 300,000 gems served!)



Tom Copeland

4/30/2005 8:52:00 PM

0

On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 09:56 +0900, Chad Fowler wrote:
> What I was hoping for is stats on gems.rubyforge.org. We report user
> agent when people do a remote install, so we could see who's using
> what versions.

Ah, nope, we don't capture that yet in the HTTP logs. Hm. I wonder if
anything bad would happened if I added that to the log output spec
thingy. Would it break all the previous Webalizer graphs and whatnot...

Yours,

Tom




Ash

7/10/2008 5:46:00 PM

0

Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:
> Comrade Equinox <dr@water.mann> wrote:
>
>> Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:
>>> Comrade Equinox <dr@water.mann> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:
>>>>> Comrade Craig R <mag@whee.ls> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:
>>>>>>> Comrade Craig R <mag@whee.ls> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does one lie about Rush making $400 million? To make an issue
>>>>>>>>> personal is counterproductive and unnecessary.
>>>>>>>> I do what I please with Homu, sod off.
>>>>>>> Realize Usenet is a public forum. Keyword being public.
>>>>>> Ya, so?
>>>>> Be prepared for criticism. If you don't like it. Use IM.
>>>> I eat it for an appetizer.
>>>>
>>>> IM is for cubicle dwarfs.
>>>
>>> Then don't whine
>> eat my arse.
>
> More whining, huh? Oh well.

yaaaaaaaaawn...


> -
>
> Diplomacy: Obama is the only major candidate who
> supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with
> Iran without preconditions.


Yes, he's given away his first bargaining chip - publicly...

Governor Swill

7/11/2008 6:58:00 AM

0

This is Berkeley Bolshevik's brain on drugs:
>Comrade Equinox wrote:
>>IM is for cubicle dwarfs.

>Then don't whine about being criticized for your public postings.

You obviously don't understand what Usenet is for.

Swill
--
Gobama! Gobama! Gobama! Gobama!