Nicklas
7/15/2008 3:46:00 PM
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:21:19 -0700, "MioMyo"
<USA_Patriot@Somewhere.com> wrote:
>>>> Remember Saddam's sons? Remember the Bush administration showboating
>>>> their deaths with pictures of their dead bloated bodies for the world
>>>> to see?
>>>
>>>Did it upset you to see your hero's dead like that ?
>>
It sure exemplified the meaness, the lack of
exhibiting American moral values, principles and
anything connected with American ideals.
>
>No, they ponder whether or not to do it in the first place and it wa decided
>that would be the only way to assure the people of Iraq they were really
>gone.
You're still evading the issue of the lies that got us
there
We were NOT sold on a war to make Iraqis "have a better
life"----we were told (lies) that Iraq was planning an
attack with "tons of WMD", "Missiles", and "Nuclear
weapons", plus was in cahoots with Bin Laden and Al
Queda.
ALL lies.
Killing Saddams sons isn't the issue----the issue is
being there in the first place.
If Iraqis wanted Saddam's Sons dead---then THEY should
have done it.
>But if you really had a shred of morality, you would have some empathy for
>Nick Berg, Danny Peril and the other which were brutalized and some video
>taped for the world to see.
Had they (and we) not been there, how could they have
been killed?
Seems to me that Saddam didn't kill them, Al Queda
did---and THEY were holed up in Pakistan/Afghanistan
some distance away from Iraq. Isn't that true?
>However, I'm sure you realised their deaths all
>for your perverted partisan payback reasons....
They could not have been killed had Bush not lied us
into a war.
>> Not surprising that a conservative would not see how it
>> wasn't a good showing for the American People.
>
>Not surprising you don't consider the head lopping Islamo-Fascist to be
>immoral.....
The "head-Loppers" were Al Queda, you ignorant moron
Iraq had NOTHING to do with Al Queda.