Jon Raphaelson
4/15/2005 6:03:00 AM
Actually I think something like this would be a good idea, but it could
be extended a bit. Maybe there could be something like an "intro to the
ML" [ANN] every month, that could be something like an FAQ for people
who are new. So you could have links to ruby-docs, why's guide, your
LearnToProgram, and answer questions like where to go to find specific
rails info, and any other types of newbie questions that come up. I know
that I would have loved something like this 6 months ago (and probably
would learn a few things now too).
Then also, it could act something like the ruby weekly where new faq's
could get added to the list every month.
My 2c.
Jon Raphaelson
Chris Pine wrote:
> How do you spell ettiquette? No, no, that's not really my question...
>
> Every time my tutorial gets mentioned on the ML (usually by me, but,
> flatteringly enough, not always :), I get a definite spike in my inbox
> of people saying thanks, or asking me questions about various aspects
> of Ruby or programming. (And I answer *every* email I get, in as
> helpful a way as I can, I am proud to state... though this takes up at
> least several hours a week if the tutorial was mentioned that week!)
>
> Now my tutorial has been around for a while, but people who are new
> are, of course, not going to know that. So my question:
>
> How would people feel if every other week (or every month?) I made an
> [ANN] announcement on the ML? I really don't have anything new to
> announce, and it would, in general, be annoying for someone to keep
> announcing the same project over and over again with no real change.
> However, this seems like a special case, since this is specifically
> aimed at people who are *new* to the ML. And, as I said, I only ask
> because I really do notice a spike every time it is mentioned.
>
> I know it's not the canonical "ruby for non-programmers" tutorial out
> there (though I'd like to apply for the position, if it exists :).
> But it is the only (completed) thing of its kind. (I would not
> consider why's Poignant Guide to be of the same kind; it's in a class
> all its own! I think it serves a very different need, and a different
> class of people. For example, I doubt any experienced Rubyists would
> get much out of my tutorial, much less find it entertaining, but I
> can't even read the Poignant Guide without my inhaler! Because, you
> know, it's funny. And I have asthma.)
>
> So let me know what you think, and *please* don't be shy about saying
> that you don't think it's ok.
>
> Thanks, all,
>
> Chris
>
>