[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.webcontrols

IEWC Treeview Control

Manish Jain

1/20/2003 6:21:00 AM

I am using IEWC TreeView to provide trees on my ASP pages. I have lots of
trees that have common TreeNodeType

The TreeNodeType defination itself is quite heavy.

eg:
<iewc:treeview id="Treeview2" style="Z-INDEX: 121" runat="server"
DefaultStyle="font-family: Verdana;font-size:12px;" BorderStyle="None"
ExpandLevel="1" SelectExpands="True" Target="main">
<iewc:TreeNodeType Type="FolderAndSubFolder" Target="main"
ImageUrl="images/fc_closed.gif" SelectedImageUrl="images/fc_sel.gif"
DefaultStyle="font-weight:bold;color:black;font-size:12px;"
ExpandedImageUrl="images/fc_open.gif"></iewc:TreeNodeType>

I want to centralize the defination as it is proving quite expensive to
maintain.
How do I move all the common stuff to a CSS file?

I tried the following:

.TextContent
{
ImageUrl="images/DocumentIco.gif";
DefaultStyle="color:black;font-size:12px;"
}

but the editor says that 'ImageURL is not a know CSS property
Also, is their any better approach.

Thanks
Manish
2 Answers

Jesse Ezell

1/20/2003 6:19:00 PM

0

If you are aiming to increase reusability (because you
always set these things to the same value or something),
then create a control that inherits the treeview control
(or wraps it) and sets these values programmatically.

--Jesse

>-----Original Message-----
>I am using IEWC TreeView to provide trees on my ASP
pages. I have lots of
>trees that have common TreeNodeType
>
>The TreeNodeType defination itself is quite heavy.
>
>eg:
><iewc:treeview id="Treeview2" style="Z-INDEX: 121"
runat="server"
>DefaultStyle="font-family: Verdana;font-size:12px;"
BorderStyle="None"
>ExpandLevel="1" SelectExpands="True" Target="main">
><iewc:TreeNodeType Type="FolderAndSubFolder"
Target="main"
>ImageUrl="images/fc_closed.gif"
SelectedImageUrl="images/fc_sel.gif"
>DefaultStyle="font-weight:bold;color:black;font-
size:12px;"
>ExpandedImageUrl="images/fc_open.gif"></iewc:TreeNodeType
>
>
>I want to centralize the defination as it is proving
quite expensive to
>maintain.
>How do I move all the common stuff to a CSS file?
>
>I tried the following:
>
>..TextContent
>{
>ImageUrl="images/DocumentIco.gif";
>DefaultStyle="color:black;font-size:12px;"
>}
>
>but the editor says that 'ImageURL is not a know CSS
property
>Also, is their any better approach.
>
>Thanks
>Manish
>
>
>.
>

Manish Jain

1/21/2003 8:26:00 AM

0

Thanks Jesse.

But I am new to DotNet and don't know how to do that.

Manish


"Jesse Ezell" <jesse@activehead.com> wrote in message
news:069a01c2c0a8$16b7d3e0$d6f82ecf@TK2MSFTNGXA13...
> If you are aiming to increase reusability (because you
> always set these things to the same value or something),
> then create a control that inherits the treeview control
> (or wraps it) and sets these values programmatically.
>
> --Jesse
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >I am using IEWC TreeView to provide trees on my ASP
> pages. I have lots of
> >trees that have common TreeNodeType
> >
> >The TreeNodeType defination itself is quite heavy.
> >
> >eg:
> ><iewc:treeview id="Treeview2" style="Z-INDEX: 121"
> runat="server"
> >DefaultStyle="font-family: Verdana;font-size:12px;"
> BorderStyle="None"
> >ExpandLevel="1" SelectExpands="True" Target="main">
> ><iewc:TreeNodeType Type="FolderAndSubFolder"
> Target="main"
> >ImageUrl="images/fc_closed.gif"
> SelectedImageUrl="images/fc_sel.gif"
> >DefaultStyle="font-weight:bold;color:black;font-
> size:12px;"
> >ExpandedImageUrl="images/fc_open.gif"></iewc:TreeNodeType
> >
> >
> >I want to centralize the defination as it is proving
> quite expensive to
> >maintain.
> >How do I move all the common stuff to a CSS file?
> >
> >I tried the following:
> >
> >..TextContent
> >{
> >ImageUrl="images/DocumentIco.gif";
> >DefaultStyle="color:black;font-size:12px;"
> >}
> >
> >but the editor says that 'ImageURL is not a know CSS
> property
> >Also, is their any better approach.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Manish
> >
> >
> >.
> >