[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

microsoft.public.frontpage.programming

RE: Help with User Selections after a Database Search Operation

dj Rick Mitchell

4/25/2004 4:16:00 PM


Can you provide a little more detailed direction on how to make this happen

Is there a tutorial or example or two that outlines one or more of the concepts needed to turn this from an idea into reality?

Thanks in advance for your assistance

RIC

----- Vijay R Gangolli [MSFT] wrote: ----

Hi Rick

It might get a little tricky, but looks very much possible. Need to use
some client side scripting

So you have the DRW [database results wizard] screen ready.
1. Just insert a check box next to the fields i.e. <<CategoryID>
2. Double click on the field and change its value to
<%=FP_FieldLink(fp_rs,"CategoryID")%> where categoryID is the field name
3. Now when you browse you will find that the checkbox actually has the
field value
4. Now add a blank form at the end of the page with a "Send email" button
5. This onclick of this button could look for all checkboxes in the page
with property checked = true and take their value and submit to the mail
sending form

Regards
Vija

Disclaimer: This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties and confers
no right

-------------------
| Thread-Topic: Help with User Selections after a Database Search Operatio
| thread-index: AcQG0KfnqJobl7plT3iDXEMuZUk4Sg=
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.frontpage.programmin
| From: "=?Utf-8?B?ZGogUmljayBNaXRjaGVsbA==?=" <rick@djrickmitchell.com
| Subject: Help with User Selections after a Database Search Operatio

|
| I've come across a problem spot with my online database. I have it set
up so a user can input search criteria, and everything displays as I had
hoped

The next step is my desire to have a unfilled radio button or unchecked
check box next to each of the items that were returned in the search so
that a user could then select anywhere from none to all of the
buttons/check marks and the information for each selected item would be
passed on to either a form or email to be forwarded to me.

The site is not using a user login database, so the ability for the person
to add their name/email address to the selected info needs to be considered

Can someone point me in the right direction for taking this simple results
database to the next level

Thanks in advance

RIC

|


29 Answers

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax

10/25/2010 12:15:00 AM

0

On 24/10/2010 23:30, Larianov wrote:
> On Oct 24, 9:46 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax<dirk.bru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On 24/10/2010 14:41, fyfp...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Just take a look at the current mess in France and many other parts of
>>> Europe. It was brought about at a time when the one-man-one-vote
>>> democracy was being practiced. Do we expect the same type of
>>> democratic system, which is commensurate with political opportunism,
>>> will be able to fix up the current mess? It may be, but perhaps after
>>> a lot of painful and violent struggles.
>>
>>> Looking back at the rise of the Nazi party in Germany before WW2,
>>> one would naturally find the necessity of strong muscles rather than
>>> politically correct persuasion needed for the job of bringing back
>>> laws and orders.
>>
>>> Imagine, for a moment, if the Nazi did away with the kinds of nonsense
>>> such as Aryan Nation, killing of the Jews and invading the rest of
>>> Europe for more room to let Aryans grow, etc but instead had focused
>>> on getting the trouble makers out of the way,
>>> how Germany and the world would have looked like by now.
>>
>> Well, it would look just like modern China.
>> However, both NS and Fascism have one major weakness - a tendency to
>> corruption that eventually brings about its downfall after ruining the
>> economy. The Chinese have the same problem. Whether it can be brought
>> under control remains to be seen.
>
>
> China has a command economy. There are Brits, Canadians and

No, it's mostly a Fascist economy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_...

"An inherent aspect of fascist economies was economic dirigisme[12],
meaning an economy where the government exerts strong directive
influence, and effectively controls production and allocation of
resources. In general, apart from the nationalizations of some
industries, fascist economies were based on private property and private
initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state."

--
Dirk

http://www.transcende... - Transcendence UK
http://www.blogtalkradio.co... - Occult Talk Show

Stan Pierce

10/25/2010 4:33:00 AM

0


"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8ik0g2Fgr5U1@mid.individual.net...
>(snipped)
In general, apart from the nationalizations of some
> industries, fascist economies were based on private property and private
> initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state."
>
>

# And that service to the state is what makes a country great. It becomes
rich from pride in innovation for one thing.

Dilute that service to the state and letting private interests predominate
and you get treasonous people selling information and patents etc to
foreigners who then plot against you, like the Rosenbergs and the Atom Bomb.

At least Hitler had scientists he could rely on to look after German
interests first. Building those pocket battleships was one. There must be
a reason for that that has nothing to do with money.


Kangaroo Court Australia

10/25/2010 4:36:00 AM

0

On Oct 25, 3:32 pm, "SPierce" <ecre...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> "Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bru...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:8ik0g2Fgr5U1@mid.individual.net...>(snipped)
>
>  In general, apart from the nationalizations of some
>
> > industries, fascist economies were based on private property and private
> > initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state."
>
> # And that service to the state is what makes a country great.  It becomes
> rich from pride in innovation for one thing.
>
> Dilute that service to the state and letting private interests predominate
> and you get treasonous people selling information and patents etc to
> foreigners who then plot against you, like the Rosenbergs and the Atom Bomb.
>
> At least Hitler had scientists he could rely on to look after German
> interests first.  Building those pocket battleships was one.  There must be
> a reason for that that has nothing to do with money.

Yeah, Hitler had them jewish scientists, who he sent to the gas
chambers anyways

abelard

10/25/2010 10:39:00 AM

0

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:32:58 +1000, "SPierce" <ecreipt@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:

>
>"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8ik0g2Fgr5U1@mid.individual.net...
>>(snipped)
> In general, apart from the nationalizations of some
>> industries, fascist economies were based on private property and private
>> initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state."
>>
>>
>
># And that service to the state is what makes a country great. It becomes
>rich from pride in innovation for one thing.
>
>Dilute that service to the state and letting private interests predominate
>and you get treasonous people selling information and patents etc to
>foreigners who then plot against you, like the Rosenbergs and the Atom Bomb.
>
>At least Hitler had scientists he could rely on to look after German
>interests first. Building those pocket battleships was one. There must be
>a reason for that that has nothing to do with money.

something wrong with your theory....

despite your claims....hitler lost....mussolini lost...

as keynes said of socialism in 1925

'...if irreligious capitalism is ultimately to defeat religious
communism it is not enough that it should be economically more
efficient - it must be many times more efficient....'

socialism lost in the ussr...it lost in irak....

it is losing in china....it is losing in zimbabwe...it is losing
in n. korea....

it is about time you dopes started to realise that it is a
useless theory...a theory that always fails in the real world...

it's a daft religion held by primitives...

--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc over 1 million document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

William Black

10/25/2010 2:14:00 PM

0

On 25/10/10 05:32, SPierce wrote:

> At least Hitler had scientists he could rely on to look after German
> interests first. Building those pocket battleships was one. There must be
> a reason for that that has nothing to do with money.

They were crap.

One got thrashed by three light curisers of which two were really just
big destroyers.



--
William Black

Free men have open minds
If you want loyalty, buy a dog...

SaPeIsMa

10/25/2010 6:55:00 PM

0

"SPierce" <ecreipt@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:5M7xo.369$MF5.108@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
>
> "Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8ik0g2Fgr5U1@mid.individual.net...
>>(snipped)
>> In general, apart from the nationalizations of some
>> industries, fascist economies were based on private property and private
>> initiative, but these were contingent upon service to the state."
>>
>>
>
> # And that service to the state is what makes a country great. It becomes
> rich from pride in innovation for one thing.
>
> Dilute that service to the state and letting private interests predominate
> and you get treasonous people selling information and patents etc to
> foreigners who then plot against you, like the Rosenbergs and the Atom
> Bomb.
>

LOL
What an ignorant crok of shit
The Rosenbergs plotted against the US for IDEOLOGY
The were communists who believed that enslaving people to the state
would be good for them
We know how socialist enslavement worked
To the tune of over 140,000,000 killed by those states.



> At least Hitler had scientists he could rely on to look after German
> interests first. Building those pocket battleships was one. There must
> be a reason for that that has nothing to do with money.
>

LOL
More IGNORANT crock of shit.
Tons of scientists escaped Germany and other enslaved countries to settle in
Allied countries before, during and after the war.
The same is true for people from the Soviet and other autocratic communist
nations.



Stan Pierce

10/25/2010 8:05:00 PM

0


"SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
news:C6mdnUdwqs15T1jRnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@bright.net...
(snipped)
> LOL
> What an ignorant crok of shit
> The Rosenbergs plotted against the US for IDEOLOGY
> The were communists who believed that enslaving people to the state
> would be good for them
> We know how socialist enslavement worked
> To the tune of over 140,000,000 killed by those states.
>

# You got that fact right, and forgot the part where they were supposedly
American citizens first but felt no duty to America. Not exactly the same
thing as being an American.


> More IGNORANT crock of shit.
> Tons of scientists escaped Germany and other enslaved countries to settle
> in Allied countries before, during and after the war.
> The same is true for people from the Soviet and other autocratic communist
> nations.
>

# Again you fail to observe they were supposedly German citizens. Germans
did not need to 'escape'. Not only that they were proud to be German.
Something alien in the mix there was the reason for them 'escaping'. Real
Germans never thought of 'escaping'.

Those 'escapers' went to America and infiltrated the legal profession that
changed immigration laws in the 1960s and look what has happened to America
since. Those same so called American citizens who escaped from Germany
went back into Germany after the war and IMPOSED on Germany a legal
political system that was not of German make but came out of Columbia
university...the Frankfurt School professors. Now look what has happened to
Germany with it's alien Muslim mix.


SaPeIsMa

10/25/2010 8:31:00 PM

0

"SPierce" <ecreipt@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:Aplxo.422$gM3.404@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com...
>
> "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@HotMail.com> wrote in message
> news:C6mdnUdwqs15T1jRnZ2dnUVZ_oednZ2d@bright.net...
> (snipped)
>> LOL
>> What an ignorant crok of shit
>> The Rosenbergs plotted against the US for IDEOLOGY
>> The were communists who believed that enslaving people to the state
>> would be good for them
>> We know how socialist enslavement worked
>> To the tune of over 140,000,000 killed by those states.
>>
>
# You got that fact right, and forgot the part where they were supposedly
# American citizens first but felt no duty to America. Not exactly the same
# thing as being an American.
#

We have a lot of those "american citizens by birth" who feel no kinship with
being Americans
The guy in the White House is one of them, according to his books, and
the people he associates with.


>
>> More IGNORANT crock of shit.
>> Tons of scientists escaped Germany and other enslaved countries to settle
>> in Allied countries before, during and after the war.
>> The same is true for people from the Soviet and other autocratic
>> communist nations.
>>
>
# Again you fail to observe they were supposedly German citizens. Germans
# did not need to 'escape'. Not only that they were proud to be German.
# Something alien in the mix there was the reason for them 'escaping'. Real
# Germans never thought of 'escaping'.
#

LOL
What a stupidly recursive pile of ignorant puke
A whole bunch of German citizens "escaped", and left without trying to get
travel documents that would never be issued to them

As to your definition of "real Germans"
Go ahead and clarify that
Always fun to laugh at sheer stupidity




>
> Those 'escapers' went to America and infiltrated the legal profession that
> changed immigration laws in the 1960s and look what has happened to
> America since. Those same so called American citizens who escaped from
> Germany went back into Germany after the war and IMPOSED on Germany a
> legal political system that was not of German make but came out of
> Columbia university...the Frankfurt School professors. Now look what has
> happened to Germany with it's alien Muslim mix.
>

More silly nonsense
But thanks for playing
Come back when you don't confuse your fantasies with actual reality


Actually, don't bother
I'm not going to waste my time with such ignorance

Stan Pierce

10/25/2010 8:48:00 PM

0


"William Black" <blackusenet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ia43ag$kpk$4@news.eternal-september.org...
> On 25/10/10 05:32, SPierce wrote:
>
>> At least Hitler had scientists he could rely on to look after German
>> interests first. Building those pocket battleships was one. There must
>> be
>> a reason for that that has nothing to do with money.
>
> They were crap.
>
> One got thrashed by three light curisers of which two were really just big
> destroyers.
>

# It was not crap..it was outmanoeuvred by three very good sea-captains and
a lucky hit. That's war. The best implements don't necessarily win.

You see the same effect in Afghanistan. Bloody crude medieval Arabs against
the might of American tanks...a joke yes?


Barry Bruyea

10/25/2010 8:59:00 PM

0

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:13:35 +0100, William Black
<blackusenet@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 25/10/10 05:32, SPierce wrote:
>
>> At least Hitler had scientists he could rely on to look after German
>> interests first. Building those pocket battleships was one. There must be
>> a reason for that that has nothing to do with money.
>
>They were crap.
>
>One got thrashed by three light curisers of which two were really just
>big destroyers.


Germany's surface fleet was a non-starter in WWII as it was in WWI.
With Hitler, the pocket battleships were an ego trip and in most cases
he didn't even have the guts to use them because he was afraid of a
loss of face. He would have been better off to put additional
resources into his sub fleet.