[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software

Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

=?Utf-8?B?cm9kY2hhcg==?=

4/15/2004 10:36:00 PM

I have a web page that has 4 very small video clips that appear in sequence with text. It runs great in my FP browser, but when I published it the video takes a second to download, so visitors see a small (.wmv) box. How can I preload these video files before the web page script starts up

The .wmv files are about 200 KB each. The video works correctly in both the FP2003 preview browser (M.I.E. 6.0) and on my published web page. But, on the published web page, like I said it shows a small (.wmv) box for a split second before the video starts to play. It would be great if I can preload the video files before the web page loads. any suggestion are greatly appreciated, or if it is not possible at all

6 Answers

=?Utf-8?B?cm9kY2hhcg==?=

4/19/2004 3:56:00 PM

0

Can you do me a favor and let me know when you find out?
Also does anyone know how what format is BEST to play
back animated logo's etc?
I was hoping I could get away with a 300 frame animated
gif and I was able to reduce it to 176k but it won't play
back at any reasonable speed. Anyone have a suggestion?
murph@virtualpartners.com


>-----Original Message-----
>I have a web page that has 4 very small video clips that
appear in sequence with text. It runs great in my FP
browser, but when I published it the video takes a second
to download, so visitors see a small (.wmv) box. How can
I preload these video files before the web page script
starts up.
>
>The .wmv files are about 200 KB each. The video works
correctly in both the FP2003 preview browser (M.I.E. 6.0)
and on my published web page. But, on the published web
page, like I said it shows a small (.wmv) box for a split
second before the video starts to play. It would be
great if I can preload the video files before the web
page loads. any suggestion are greatly appreciated, or
if it is not possible at all
>
>.
>

Roger

6/8/2010 6:48:00 PM

0

On Jun 8, 1:45 pm, Derek <de...@ycoaoffice.com> wrote:
>  Roger  wrote:
> > Just wondering, are you selling because you have another D clone you
> > like better? In general, which of the D clones do you like the best
> > for a fusion sound, and which best for a jazz sound? I just received
> > my D'Lite and love it for its Ford/Carlton distortion, but it's not as
> > good as a basic Fender design for jazz. A little too much midrange,
> > and can't seem to get that high end sparkle. Still, it does sound very
> > good for jazz. I do like my Frenzel 5E3 Deluxe Plus better for jazz.
>
> I too have a 5E3 clone that I like better for jazz, but the Ceriatone
> OTS is great for the rest of the stuff I play.
>
> I am not sure I have heard a D type amp get that Fender sparkle you
> are talking about.  Jack certainly would know though, as I think he
> has played pretty much all of the main ones out there.

Derek, which specific circuit do you have? Nik went thru a number of
iterations as you no doubt know, with the most recent circuit being
one which Jaz was instrumental (no pun intended) in helping bring
about. Just curious.

Derek

6/8/2010 6:51:00 PM

0

Roger wrote:
>
> Derek, which specific circuit do you have? Nik went thru a number of
> iterations as you no doubt know, with the most recent circuit being
> one which Jaz was instrumental (no pun intended) in helping bring
> about. Just curious.

I specifically asked for the "JAZ Pack" when I ordered. :-)

sheetsofsound

6/8/2010 9:58:00 PM

0

On Jun 8, 11:10 am, Roger <rogertayl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 9:54 am, sheetsofsound <jackzuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Great jazz/fusion amp. $2k shipped
>
> Just wondering, are you selling because you have another D clone you
> like better? In general, which of the D clones do you like the best
> for a fusion sound, and which best for a jazz sound? I just received
> my D'Lite and love it for its Ford/Carlton distortion, but it's not as
> good as a basic Fender design for jazz. A little too much midrange,
> and can't seem to get that high end sparkle. Still, it does sound very
> good for jazz. I do like my Frenzel 5E3 Deluxe Plus better for jazz.

This is the best dumble clone I have owned. The built in reverb is
sweet (better than fuchs) and the reliability and build are among the
best as well. It's also got the sweetest cleans of any of the dumble
clones I've tried. It's got the best jazz sound of any of the amps I
own.

I've got a '69 Fender Super Reverb in a head cab (MM transformers), a
Marshall Plexi clone with power scaling and effect loop and a Bruno
Underground 30. I'm probably going to sell one other amp as well.
Trying to prune down a little.

sheetsofsound

6/9/2010 1:16:00 AM

0

On Jun 8, 8:14 pm, jim.dolin...@comcast.net (JimmyD) wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:47:36 -0700 (PDT), Roger
>
> <rogertayl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Derek, which specific circuit do you have? Nik went thru a number of
> >iterations as you no doubt know, with the most recent circuit being
> >one which Jaz was instrumental (no pun intended) in helping bring
> >about. Just curious.
>
> My OTS is about two years old and was purchased after the mods were
> made to Nik's original layout.  My buddies HRM OTS is a little over a
> year old.  Both of them are excellent jazz amps especially after you
> run with an external buffered FX loop and play through Evm12L's.
>
> Jim

The thing about the two rock is that it's got the reverb and buffered
loop built in. I hated carrying around the extra box for the loop. I
wish Nik would build one with the buffered loop and reverb built in.

sheetsofsound

6/11/2010 1:26:00 AM

0

On Jun 10, 8:00 pm, jim.dolin...@comcast.net (JimmyD) wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:15:35 -0700 (PDT), sheetsofsound
>
> <jackzuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> My OTS is about two years old and was purchased after the mods were
> >> made to Nik's original layout. My buddies HRM OTS is a little over a
> >> year old. Both of them are excellent jazz amps especially after you
> >> run with an external buffered FX loop and play through Evm12L's.
>
> >> Jim
>
> >The thing about the two rock is that it's got the reverb and buffered
> >loop built in. I hated carrying around the extra box for the loop. I
> >wish Nik would build one with the buffered loop and reverb built in.
>
> Yes, it is a small hassle setting up and taking care of.  Then you
> have to worry about the cabling and running the external effects.
> Then you have to dial in your gain structure.  The resultant tone is
> quite worth it.  As good as that rig is, it is taking a back seat to
> the Axe-Fx.  Good god that was money well spent!
>
>

Yeah, the axefx is fantastic. I think i'm going to get rid of all my
tube amps.