microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.interop

sr

11/6/2009 8:31:00 PM

"Werner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message
news:6268caa6-f801-4f66-bedf-4dbc8a64a8c4@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 6, 11:36 am, martin <martin.secrest...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 9:40 pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > BEST E-MAIL OF THE DAY
>
> > Subject: Fw: I don't understand this!
>
> > Let me see if I understand all this....
>
> > IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD
> > LABOR......
>
> > IF YOU GO INTO CHINA ILLEGALLY, YOU'RE CONSIDERED A SPY AND GET HARD
> > PRISON IME.....
>
> > IF YOU GO INTO GERMANY ILLEGALLY, YOU GET A HEFTY FINE, WORK IT OFF OR
> > PAY
> > IT OFF, THEN DEPORTED........
>
> > IF YOU GO INTO ENGLAND ILLEGALLY, YOU ARE IMMEDIATELY JAILED AND
> > DEPORTED.........
>
> > IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED
> > INDEFINITELY....
>
> > BUT, IF YOU CROSS THE U.S... BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET:
> > 1. A DRIVERS LICENSE
> > 2. A SOCIAL SECURITY CARD
> > 3. WELFARE
> > 4. FOOD STAMPS AND
> > 5. FREE HEALTH CARE?
>
> > I guess I still don't understand....maybe we need to VOTE OUR LAWMAKERS
> > OUT!!!
>
> > GO GREEN!! RECYCLE CONGRESS !!!
>
> Worthless maggot goverment in Washington, DC needs total replacement.
>
> tt
>
> http://www.wv... Western Voices


It needs to be limited. Wasn't that was the original idea?

"
In crafting the Bill of Rights, the framers were careful to
acknowledge implicitly and explicitly two key truths:

The first is that government does not grant rights it acknowledges
them. They exist independently of government. They're part of who and
what we are. And, as Jefferson noted in the Declaration of
Independence, the only legitimate function of government is to secure
them.

The second is that government is a servant to whom we delegate powers,
not a master who dispenses privileges. The Constitution carefully
enumerates the powers we, the people, delegate to our government and
it specifically denies that government any powers not so delegated.
Our rights lie beyond the pale of that delegation. They are
sacrosanct. Any government which infringes upon them is engaged in an
intolerable usurpation.
"
www.badnarik.org
-----

A "right" as envisioned by the Founders meant that the government
was not permitted to interfere with your pursuit of them, i.e.,
your pursuit of happiness was to be unhindered by government.

The "right" of free speech means that government cannot interfere
with your free speech. The "right" of gun ownership means that the
government cannot infringe your gun ownership. What does "right"
to health care mean? It means that the government cannot stand in
the way of your pursuit of health care, or impede your
obtaining health care. The "right" to an attorney means that the
government cannot prevent you obtaining an attorney to represent
you.

Of course, "right" has incorrectly come to mean that someone must
supply you with something. If your "right" to housing means that
some slave must supply you with housing, and your "right" to health
care means that some slave must supply you with health care, and your
"right" to an attorney means that some slave must supply you with an
attorney, does your "right" to free speech mean that some slave must
supply you with a loudspeaker, or TV air time? Does your "right" to
own guns mean that some slave must supply you with guns?


http://capitaldistrict-lp.org/Ri...

http://www.capitaldistrict-lp.org/Ri...
Dollars in the common treasury are like fish in the common sea -
anyone who can will harvest to extinction. That is why socialism is
fundamentally corrupting and can not work. The Fed is making a lot of
paper fish. This is an illusion of wealth. The real fish are gone.
----
?http://www.capitaldistrict-lp.org...
Governing has become a way to get privileges for some at the expense
of others.
http://www.capitaldistrict-lp.org/...
this is a keeper, in the SAVE folder

make this =

Very simple

Government to PROTECT our Freedoms, given to us by our Creator Period, End
of Story

But, if you are a Walla Eyed Nancy, (that was stunned that she would be
confronted with the Constitution,) People holding offices see it as their
right to curtail our freedom that takes the power from individuals and
centeralize those powers into Washington DC.

I believe that is what the fight is about more than Dems. Vs Republicans and
vice versa.

That's my opinion and I'm sticking with it,