[lnkForumImage]
TotalShareware - Download Free Software
Confronta i prezzi di migliaia di prodotti.
Asp Forum
 Home | Login | Register | Search 


 

Forums >

comp.lang.ruby

look-behind regexp ?

Shajith

3/30/2005 1:48:00 PM

Hi!
Are there any plans to support look-behinds in the core regexp engine?

I'm curious as to why we don't have it.
Thanks
Shajith

PS: I found an old request about this in the archives:
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/rub...
13 Answers

Yukihiro Matsumoto

3/30/2005 1:58:00 PM

0

Hi,

In message "Re: look-behind regexp ?"
on Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:48:18 +0900, Shajith <demerzel@gmail.com> writes:

|Are there any plans to support look-behinds in the core regexp engine?

1.9 Oniguruma regexp engine already has one.

matz.

Shajith

3/30/2005 2:12:00 PM

0

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:58:08 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto
<matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>
> 1.9 Oniguruma regexp engine already has one.
>
> matz.
Thanks!

Shajith

B. K. Oxley (binkley)

3/30/2005 2:44:00 PM

0

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Shajith <demerzel@gmail.com> writes:
>> Are there any plans to support look-behinds in the core regexp
>> engine?
>
> 1.9 Oniguruma regexp engine already has one.

Where can I read more about this regexp engine? How does it compare to:

* Perl's own regexps
* regexp-engine from AEditor (http://aeditor.ruby...)
* PCRE (http://www...)


Thanks,
--binkley

Florian Gross

3/30/2005 3:24:00 PM

0

B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:

>> 1.9 Oniguruma regexp engine already has one.
> Where can I read more about this regexp engine?

http://www.geocities.jp/kosako3/oniguruma/... seems to have a
fairly complete listing of its features.

B. K. Oxley (binkley)

3/30/2005 3:29:00 PM

0

Florian Gross wrote:
> http://www.geocities.jp/kosako3/oniguruma/... seems to have a
> fairly complete listing of its features.

Ah, yes. Thanks. I should have Googled first. :)

But reading through that and the documentation on the same site, I am
still looking for a rationale document. Why Onigurama and not, say,
PCRE? Why a new regexp parser?


Cheers,
--binkley

Austin Ziegler

3/30/2005 3:59:00 PM

0

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:29:03 +0900, B. K. Oxley (binkley)
<binkley@alumni.rice.edu> wrote:
> Florian Gross wrote:
> > http://www.geocities.jp/kosako3/oniguruma/... seems to have a
> > fairly complete listing of its features.
> Ah, yes. Thanks. I should have Googled first. :)
>
> But reading through that and the documentation on the same site, I am
> still looking for a rationale document. Why Onigurama and not, say,
> PCRE? Why a new regexp parser?

1. Licensing. PCRE's licensing has been somewhat fluid. The current
release seems OK.
2. Control. In many ways, such a core feature to Ruby should be native to Ruby.
3. Native concepts. Ruby REs are a bit different because they end up
being objects.

-austin
--
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
* Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca

B. K. Oxley (binkley)

3/30/2005 4:03:00 PM

0

Austin Ziegler wrote:
> 1. Licensing. PCRE's licensing has been somewhat fluid. The current
> release seems OK.
> 2. Control. In many ways, such a core feature to Ruby should be native to Ruby.
> 3. Native concepts. Ruby REs are a bit different because they end up
> being objects.

Hrm.

In all honesty, these objections seem weak to me.

If the licensing is not a problem right now, why would it necessarily
become one in the future? (Although I don't know the history of
licensing in PCRE, so perhaps it has a record of arbitrariness.)

Control is not so important when you have the source code. And Ruby can
contribute to the development of PCRE.

I'm unsure what you mean in point three. I presume that a Ruby regexp
implementation would use PCRE for implementation, wrapping any details
so that the implementation is not visible, and only objects remain.

Not to be so nitpicky, I only used PCRE as an example. I have an
inherent dislike of wheel-reinvention (my natural laziness at play), so
my ears perk up when I see something like a rewrite of regexp parsers
when so many fine ones are already around.


Cheers,
--binkley

Yukihiro Matsumoto

3/30/2005 4:05:00 PM

0

Hi,

In message "Re: look-behind regexp ?"
on Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:29:03 +0900, "B. K. Oxley (binkley)" <binkley@alumni.rice.edu> writes:

|But reading through that and the documentation on the same site, I am
|still looking for a rationale document. Why Onigurama and not, say,
|PCRE? Why a new regexp parser?

PCRE does only support UTF-8 (as far as I know), not multiple
encodings like Ruby does. Oniguruma supports UTF-8, UTF-16,
ISO-8859-*, EUC-JP, Shift_JIS, and lot more.

matz.

B. K. Oxley (binkley)

3/30/2005 4:09:00 PM

0

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> PCRE does only support UTF-8 (as far as I know), not multiple
> encodings like Ruby does. Oniguruma supports UTF-8, UTF-16,
> ISO-8859-*, EUC-JP, Shift_JIS, and lot more.

Ah. I inferred as much from the prominence given the list of encodings,
but wanted to find out more.


Thanks,
--binkley

Yukihiro Matsumoto

3/30/2005 4:34:00 PM

0


In message "Re: look-behind regexp ?"
on Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:08:50 +0900, "B. K. Oxley (binkley)" <binkley@alumni.rice.edu> writes:

|Ah. I inferred as much from the prominence given the list of encodings,
|but wanted to find out more.

Here's the list of encodings supported by default:

ASCII BIG5 EUC-KR EUC-JP EUC-TW
ISO8859-1 ISO8859-2 ISO8859-3
ISO8859-4 ISO8859-5 ISO8859-6
ISO8859-7 ISO8859-8 ISO8859-9
ISO8859-10 ISO8859-11 ISO8859-13
ISO8859-14 ISO8859-15 ISO8859-16
KOI8 KOI8-R Shift_JIS UTF-8
UTF-16BE UTF-16LE UTF-32BE UTF-32LE

And more importantly, its encoding support is pluggable, you can add
new encoding support by writing callback routines.

matz.