In article <6alel7tnbsim3fq0hkgnv3r030s3vk0lc3@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:55:39 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>
>>In article <ttfcl7l0c7actfqsotlg1su6nsgvikkmu3@4ax.com>, duke
>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:37:27 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <6od9l7l9l471aj6qbpqvjodap65oj56c2h@4ax.com>, duke
>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:43:57 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <fju6l7lpioiohk5sa1bf98covuop1j6eae@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:04:08 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L.
Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article <r854l7ljdjqr9sg9bvngml62v5dmgv4b8f@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 08:47:11 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L.
>>Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In article <47d1l7tg093gr1dppvn8pojco4m5e17812@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:53:58 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L.
>>>>Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <itquk7d1pvdhad9309hinp418esqaj855a@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>>>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:38:24 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L.
>>>>>>Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <oa5qk79fvuc4q4vjrt53etrlngt4t461fg@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:53:10 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L.
>>>>>>>>Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <64lpk7t0hkl7527g53g76e56ksi8i1sqm3@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:58:04 -0800, rL@somis.org (? R. L.
>>>>>>>>>>Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <jqvmk7h83s2a8i2v027oc8mmnd5bj9atur@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:56:05 -0800, DanielSan
>>>>>>>><danielsan1977@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 2/26/2012 5:48 AM, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:18:10 -0800,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DanielSan<danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/26/2012 5:09 AM, duke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 03:18:14 -0800, rL@somis.org
(? R. L.
>>>>>>>>>>Measures.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>article<mlqhk71tp5ek2sa2fi5ubcc7i2qudlf6fe@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:54:42 -0800, rL@somis.org
>>(? R. L.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In
>>>>>>article<1a1fk7l5arakfj71206ioilmen3p1vg0gd@4ax.com>, duke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:02:46 -0800, rL@somis.org
>>>>(? R. L.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Measures.) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? nor do I. One problem with
Christianity is
>>>>>>>>the Ten
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Commandments do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not proscribe lying other than calumny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When are you going to stop this silliness, rl?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? When the 10 becomes the 11. Anybody
can read
>>>>>>>>>>the 10 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> glitch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it's your accusation and your suggestion.
>>>>>>>>>>Please point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?? the only proscription against lying is 8 and it
>>>>>>>>>>only covers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>calumny.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lying is always false witness. A white lie is ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? all lies are black.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not a white lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ? RCC morals - and they hubristically call it
>>"God's Holy
>>>>>>>>>>Church".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> White lies are ok.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is that written?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In our hearts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>So, not in the Bible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You don't know what's in the bible, do you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>? what you know is what the RCC tells you is in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I can read it for myself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>? "In matters of faith never trust your own judgment, but
>>>>>>always humbly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>submit to the decisions of the Holy Church."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(page 77, *A Full Catechism of the Catholic Religion*, Fr.
>>>>Joseph De
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Harbe, S.J.. 1889)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And it takes a learned man to point out all the supportive
>>>>comments all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>over the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bible. Only protest_ers take seriously any one single
verse as all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>encompassing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>? Explaining RC doctrine takes an accomplished spinmeister.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>RC doctrine said ring the bell on the hour so the villagers
knew the
>>>>>>>>>>>>time. Would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>you like to try again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>? no. You are clearly past the point of no return to reality.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Ok, so you're back to demonstrating that you can't define dogma vs
>>>>>>doctrine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>? I'm talking about what the "holy men" teach. You can label it as
>>>>>>you like.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ok, so you don't know the difference.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>? Fiction can be called by several names but it's made up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You really shouldn't be engaging in dogma/doctrine discussions if you
>>>>>>don't know
>>>>>>>the difference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>? The issue is true or false, not how it's labeled by the creators
>>thereof..
>>>>>
>>>>>Neither dogma or doctrine quality for true or false. Dogma is unquestioned
>>>>>truth of God and man-doctrine is based on dogma.
>>>>>
>>>>? all that matters is truth.
>>>
>>>Dogma is guaranteed truth.
>>>
>>? Assumptions carry no warranty.
>
>The assumption of accuracy didn't occur until the 19th century. And it only
>applies as dogma to Catholics.
>
? My guess is that Mary died and was buried in the 1st Century.
--
Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org